Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 30 May 2017, 07:38

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Police published a wanted poster for a criminal fugitive in

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1790
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

Police published a wanted poster for a criminal fugitive in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2004, 11:00
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 100% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

13. Police published a wanted poster for a criminal fugitive in a medical journal, because the fugitive was known to have a certain acute noninfectious skin problem that would eventually require a visit to a doctor. The poster asked for information about the whereabouts of the fugitive. A physicians responding to the posters request for information would not violate medical ethics, since physicians are already subject to requirements to report gunshot wounds to police and certain infectious diseases to health authorities. These exceptions to confidentiality are clearly ethical.

Which one of the following principles, while remaining compatible with the requirements cited above, supports the view that a physician┬б┬пs responding to the request would violate medical ethics?

(A) Since a physician acts both as a professional person and as a citizen, it is not ethical for a physician to conceal information about patients from duly constituted law enforcement agencies that have proper jurisdiction.

(B) Since a patient comes to a physician with the expectation that the patient┬б┬пs visit and medical condition will remain confidential, it is not ethical for a physician to share this information with anyone except personnel within the physicians office.

(C) Since the primary concern of medicine if individual and public health, it is not ethical for a physician, except in the case of gunshot wounds, to reduce patients willingness to come for treatment by a policy of disclosing their identities to law-enforcement agencies.

(D) Except as required by the medical treatment of the patient, physicians cannot ethically disclose to others information about a patient┬б┬пs identity or medical condition without the patients consent.

(E) Except to other medical personnel working to preserve or restore the health of a patient or of other persons, physicians cannot ethically disclose information about the identity of patients or their medical condition.
If you have any questions
New!
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 May 2003
Posts: 424
Location: Aus
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2004, 11:08
B ??
I don't see much difference in E also.
Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 960
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2004, 11:25
B

it talks of patient's expectations..
Director
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 501
Location: 55405
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2004, 11:33
That's pretty tough.

You have the public health issue to explain mandatory infectious disease disclosure, but the public health argument is much weaker when it comes to gunshots. I suppose the best answer would explain why the skin condition is analogous to the gunshot wound with regard to required disclosure.

A. is an argument for disclosure being ethical.
B. is pretty strong-- making the case that the right to privacy stems from the expectation of privacy.
C. States that the gunshot wound is an exception to the nondisclosure policy, and implies that by disclosing other disorders, public health will be damaged, since people will be reluctant to see their doctors.
D. completely ignores gunshot wounds and communicable diseases, and makes a broad statement against any kind of disclosure, without explaining the ethics of the situation.
E. is almost identical to B in that it exempts information-sharing with other medical professionals, but unlike B it gives no reason for the policy.

I like B and C, but I think C wins by a nose (and I wish to be contrary).
Director
Joined: 13 Nov 2003
Posts: 960
Location: Florida
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 145 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2004, 11:42
stoolfi wrote:
That's pretty tough.

You have the public health issue to explain mandatory infectious disease disclosure, but the public health argument is much weaker when it comes to gunshots. I suppose the best answer would explain why the skin condition is analogous to the gunshot wound with regard to required disclosure.

A. is an argument for disclosure being ethical.
B. is pretty strong-- making the case that the right to privacy stems from the expectation of privacy.
C. States that the gunshot wound is an exception to the nondisclosure policy, and implies that by disclosing other disorders, public health will be damaged, since people will be reluctant to see their doctors.
D. completely ignores gunshot wounds and communicable diseases, and makes a broad statement against any kind of disclosure, without explaining the ethics of the situation.
E. is almost identical to B in that it exempts information-sharing with other medical professionals, but unlike B it gives no reason for the policy.

I like B and C, but I think C wins by a nose (and I wish to be contrary).

C holds only when the patient knows that the hospital is going to disclose his identity. And if the patient is coming to the hospital even after knowing that, then nothing is unethical at hospital's part.

weird ..haan
Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 240
Location: MI
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2004, 12:11
C is the only one which comes close.

All other options do not voilate the ethics
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1790
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

06 Jan 2004, 12:48
C will violate the ethics because the fugitive has noninfectious disease. This skin disease does not cause concern for public health.
Intern
Joined: 05 Aug 2014
Posts: 9
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Police published a wanted poster for a criminal fugitive in [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Apr 2016, 04:38
I choose C, i think it is the right answer.
Re: Police published a wanted poster for a criminal fugitive in   [#permalink] 11 Apr 2016, 04:38
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
40 RAGCT 20: Criminals released from prison on parole 27 23 Jul 2016, 05:26
3 Criminologist: The main purpose of most criminal organizatio 6 26 May 2017, 05:34
1 Recidivism is the return to criminal behavior, and 2 12 Aug 2013, 18:42
3 Advances in photocopying technology allow criminals with no 3 12 Mar 2016, 07:24
1 Publishers 17 16 Oct 2013, 17:04
Display posts from previous: Sort by