It is currently 21 Nov 2017, 07:04

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that f

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 27 Oct 2011
Posts: 183

Kudos [?]: 215 [0], given: 4

Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.7
WE: Account Management (Consumer Products)
Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that f [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2012, 09:26
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

56% (01:37) correct 44% (01:37) wrong based on 883 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that freedom would encourage Russians to multiply, but as a result of dislocation and insecurity, the Russian population continues to dwindle at the rate of 700,000 a year. The government proposes to address the problem with a wide range of financial incentives, along with investments in improved health care, road safety and the like. These are positive measures, but they have been tried before, to little avail. A better plan to reverse the population decline is to improve the country's governance in both the public and the private sphere. If a greater part of the population participated in important decisions and shared in the country's wealth, then larger families would result. In addition, if corruption and greed among the elite were curbed, public health would improve and average life expectancy would increase.

The two boldfaced statements serve what function in the argument above?

(A) The first is the main point of the analyst's argument; the second is a premise that supports the the first.

(B) The first is a premise that undermines an alternative to the analyst's proposal; the second is a premise that supports the analyst's main claim.

(C) The first is a premise that contradicts the main point made by the analyst; the second is the main point of the argument.

(D) The first is a premise that supports a proposal; the second is that proposal.

(E) The first is a conclusion that the argument endorses; the second is a premise that opposes that conclusion.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

DETERMINED TO BREAK 700!!!

Kudos [?]: 215 [0], given: 4

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 351

Kudos [?]: 205 [1], given: 31

Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Re: Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that f [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2012, 19:02
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that freedom would encourage Russians to multiply, but as a result of dislocation and insecurity, the Russian population continues to dwindle at the rate of 700,000 a year. The government proposes to address the problem with a wide range of financial incentives, along with investments in improved health care, road safety and the like. These are positive measures, but they have been tried before, to little avail. A better plan to reverse the population decline is to improve the country's governance in both the public and the private sphere. If a greater part of the population participated in important decisions and shared in the country's wealth, then larger families would result. In addition, if corruption and greed among the elite were curbed, public health would improve and average life expectancy would increase.

The two boldfaced statements serve what function in the argument above?
A) The first is the main point of the analyst's argument; the second is a premise that supports the the first.
--> FIRST PART IS WRONG

B)The first is a premise that undermines an alternative to the analyst's proposal; the second is a premise that supports the analyst's main claim.
--> CORRECT

C)The first is a premise that contradicts the main point made by the analyst; the second is the main point of the
argument.
--> BOTH WRONG

D)The first is a premise that supports a proposal; the second is that proposal.
--> SECOND WRONG

E)The first is a conclusion that the argument endorses; the second is a premise that opposes that conclusion.
--> FIRST PART WRONG

Hope this helps..!!
_________________

Practice Practice and practice...!!

If there's a loophole in my analysis--> suggest measures to make it airtight.

Kudos [?]: 205 [1], given: 31

Manager
Joined: 14 Dec 2010
Posts: 202

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 5

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q44 V39
Re: Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that f [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Apr 2012, 06:05
I think its B. I was contemplating between B and C and finally choose B. The first bold face undermines the alternate proposal. The second supports the claim

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 5

Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2011
Posts: 232

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 25

Location: India
GMAT Date: 07-16-2012
GPA: 3.4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that f [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2012, 02:06
The main cliam of the argument is "A better plan to reverse the population decline is to improve the country's governance in both the public and the private sphere"

The second part supports the claim. The first part undermines the alternative proposal.

IMO B
_________________

-------Analyze why option A in SC wrong-------

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 25

Manager
Joined: 25 Feb 2012
Posts: 63

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 8

Re: Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that f [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2012, 10:25
10
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that freedom would encourage Russians to multiply, but as a result of dislocation and insecurity, the Russian population continues to dwindle at the rate of 700,000 a year. The government proposes to address the problem with a wide range of financial incentives, along with investments in improved health care, road safety and the like. These are positive measures, but they have been tried before, to little avail. A better plan to reverse the population decline is to improve the country's governance in both the public and the private sphere. If a greater part of the population participated in important decisions and shared in the country's wealth, then larger families would result. In addition, if corruption and greed among the elite were curbed, public health would improve and average life expectancy would increase.

The two boldfaced statements serve what function in the argument above?

(A) The first is the main point of the analyst's argument; the second is a premise that supports the the first.

(B) The first is a premise that undermines an alternative to the analyst's proposal; the second is a premise that supports the analyst's main claim.

(C) The first is a premise that contradicts the main point made by the analyst; the second is the main point of the argument.

(D) The first is a premise that supports a proposal; the second is that proposal.

(E) The first is a conclusion that the argument endorses; the second is a premise that opposes that conclusion.

Last edited by hazelnut on 17 Sep 2017, 01:42, edited 2 times in total.
Edited the question.

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 8

Manager
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 171

Kudos [?]: 55 [2], given: 13

Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.69
WE: Analyst (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
Re: Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that f [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2012, 10:34
2
KUDOS
Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that freedom would encourage Russians to multiply, but as a result of dislocation and insecurity, the Russian population continues to dwindle at the rate of 700,000 a year. The government proposes to address the problem with a wide range of financial incentives, along with investments in improved health care, road safety and the like. These are positive measures, but they have been tried before, to little avail. A better plan to reverse the population decline is to improve the country's governance in both the public and the private sphere. If a greater part of the population participated in important decisions and shared in the country's wealth, then larger families would result. In addition, if corruption and greed among the elite were curbed, public health would improve and average life expectancy would increase.

The two boldfaced statements serve what function in the argument above?

A) The first is the main point of the analyst's argument; the second is a premise that supports the the first.

B) The first is a premise that undermines an alternative to the analyst's proposal; the second is a premise that supports the analyst's main claim.
Correct: I'll go with this one. The premise is that the previous plan was not effective. The analyst's proposal is the population sharing in wealth and decisions. The alternative to the analyst's proposal is wide range financial incentives, but the premise of them being tried before and being ineffective undermines the government's plan to try again.

C) The first is a premise that contradicts the main point made by the analyst; the second is the main point of the argument.

D) The first is a premise that supports a proposal; the second is that proposal.

E) The first is a conclusion that the argument endorses; the second is a premise that opposes that conclusion.

Kudos [?]: 55 [2], given: 13

Director
Status: Enjoying the GMAT journey....
Joined: 26 Aug 2011
Posts: 713

Kudos [?]: 588 [0], given: 264

Location: India
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V24
Re: Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that f [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2012, 10:40
IMO B by POE.
The second BL is a premise supporting the conclusion or the main solution/claim,which is "A better plan to reverse the population decline is to improve the country's governance in both the public and the private sphere". Thus to save time, we need not to even check about the first BL.
_________________

Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.

A WAY TO INCREASE FROM QUANT 35-40 TO 47 : http://gmatclub.com/forum/a-way-to-increase-from-q35-40-to-q-138750.html

Q 47/48 To Q 50 + http://gmatclub.com/forum/the-final-climb-quest-for-q-50-from-q47-129441.html#p1064367

Three good RC strategies http://gmatclub.com/forum/three-different-strategies-for-attacking-rc-127287.html

Kudos [?]: 588 [0], given: 264

Manager
Joined: 25 Feb 2012
Posts: 63

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 8

Re: Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that f [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Apr 2012, 10:43
You guys are right. OA is B.

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 8

Intern
Joined: 13 Nov 2011
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 6

Re: Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that f [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 May 2012, 13:03
Hi, I am still confused can you please explain why its not E...
_________________

Electro Pattern

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 192

Kudos [?]: 64 [1], given: 22

Re: Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that f [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 May 2012, 03:11
1
KUDOS
B) The first is a premise that undermines an alternative to the analyst's proposal; the second is a premise that supports the analyst's main claim. - Correct Option

E) The first is a conclusion that the argument endorses; the second is a premise that opposes that conclusion.

The passage speaks about two different plan of actions. First one bombed which led the author to state that the measures been tried but to little avail.
Second plan (A better Plan) is an alternative provided by the author which is sure to bring in the desired effect.
First bold statement is not a conclusion but premise that takes neutral stand to the actual conclusion.

Hope this helps.

Kudos [?]: 64 [1], given: 22

Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3378

Kudos [?]: 9292 [1], given: 1169

Re: Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that f [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2012, 04:30
1
KUDOS
Trying to stay focuse on

E) The first is a conclusion that the argument endorses; the second is a premise that opposes that conclusion.

The first is NOT a conclusion because the passage says : These are positive measures, (doing financial incentives, investments and so on) BUT but they have been tried before, to little avail
so this is not a conclusion but something that going in a counter direction, in contrast with something said before. The plan before has tried to do something but has failed

The conclusion: A better plan to reverse the population decline is to improve the country's governance in both the public and the private sphere. The following sentence starts with: If a greater part of the population participated in important decisions and shared in the country's wealth, then larger families would result.

This statement is NOT against conclusion, but support the main claim of the argument that says to improve country's governance.

You have to stay on the look out of key words.

Hope is useful my explanation.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 9292 [1], given: 1169

Manager
Joined: 12 Mar 2012
Posts: 164

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 4

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT Date: 07-23-2012
WE: Programming (Telecommunications)
Re: Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that f [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2012, 10:08
B is what i got..
First bold face undermines the author's statement as it says that the strategy was earlier applied but failed.
Second bold face suggests an alternative to fulfill the objective.
_________________

FOCUS..this is all I need!

Ku-Do!

Kudos [?]: 61 [0], given: 4

BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 888

Kudos [?]: 735 [0], given: 44

Location: Viet Nam
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Re: Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that f [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2012, 11:29
Tough one and I cannot determine the conclusion of the argument. However, after reading Swoosh617's reasoning, I found how to approach to choice B that is correct.
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Kudos [?]: 735 [0], given: 44

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Jan 2012
Posts: 304

Kudos [?]: 223 [0], given: 38

Weight: 170lbs
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V42
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V42
WE: Analyst (Other)
Re: Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that f [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jun 2012, 14:34
Swoosh617 wrote:
Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that freedom would encourage Russians to multiply, but as a result of dislocation and insecurity, the Russian population continues to dwindle at the rate of 700,000 a year. The government proposes to address the problem with a wide range of financial incentives, along with investments in improved health care, road safety and the like. These are positive measures, but they have been tried before, to little avail. A better plan to reverse the population decline is to improve the country's governance in both the public and the private sphere. If a greater part of the population participated in important decisions and shared in the country's wealth, then larger families would result. In addition, if corruption and greed among the elite were curbed, public health would improve and average life expectancy would increase.

The two boldfaced statements serve what function in the argument above?

A) The first is the main point of the analyst's argument; the second is a premise that supports the the first.

B) The first is a premise that undermines an alternative to the analyst's proposal; the second is a premise that supports the analyst's main claim.
Correct: I'll go with this one. The premise is that the previous plan was not effective. The analyst's proposal is the population sharing in wealth and decisions. The alternative to the analyst's proposal is wide range financial incentives, but the premise of them being tried before and being ineffective undermines the government's plan to try again.

C) The first is a premise that contradicts the main point made by the analyst; the second is the main point of the argument.

D) The first is a premise that supports a proposal; the second is that proposal.

E) The first is a conclusion that the argument endorses; the second is a premise that opposes that conclusion.

This is a pretty good breakdown. One thing I would encourage test-takers to do is build a very good understanding of the passage before considering the answers. Swoosh617's explanation about Point B is a great way of doing that.

Kudos [?]: 223 [0], given: 38

Manager
Affiliations: Project Management Professional (PMP)
Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Posts: 197

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 12

Location: New Delhi, India
Re: Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that f [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Jun 2012, 02:54
May visit the below mentioned link for further clarification:

http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/pol ... 10823.html
_________________

Best
Vaibhav

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, Thanks

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 12

Manager
Joined: 01 Mar 2009
Posts: 191

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 23

Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
GMAT 2: 680 Q46 V38
GPA: 3.2
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that f [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Aug 2012, 06:46
Hey All,

Would anyone agree that this line is the overall conclusion of the paragraph?

A better plan to reverse the population decline is to improve the country's governance in both the public and the private sphere.

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 23

Manager
Joined: 31 Aug 2011
Posts: 224

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 56

Re: Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that f [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2012, 06:25
surely cmcaboy . .thats the conclusion . second premise for this conclusion
_________________

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, I kinda need some =)

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 56

Intern
Joined: 12 Jun 2012
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 18

Concentration: Technology, General Management
GMAT Date: 10-08-2012
Re: Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that f [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Sep 2012, 23:49
OA is B- Checked it

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 18

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 458

Kudos [?]: 558 [0], given: 11

Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GPA: 3.23
Re: Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that f [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jan 2013, 06:37
(1) PROPOSAL/MAIN POINT: A better plan to reverse the population decline is to improve the country's governance in both the public and the private sphere. - As you can see, the proposal and the main point are not the bolded sentences... Eliminate A , D, and E

(2) Both bolded sentences work together and are not against each other. - Eliminate C

The two boldfaced statements serve what function in the argument above?
The first is the main pointof the analyst's argument; the second is a premise that supports the the first.
The first is a premise that undermines an alternative to the analyst's proposal; the second is a premise that supports the analyst's main claim.
The first is a premise that contradictsthe main point made by the analyst; the second is the main point of the argument.
The first is a premise that supports a proposal; the second is that proposal.
The first is a conclusionthat the argument endorses; the second is a premise that opposes that conclusion.[/quote]

_________________

Impossible is nothing to God.

Kudos [?]: 558 [0], given: 11

Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 899

Kudos [?]: 912 [0], given: 322

Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Re: Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that f [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Mar 2013, 04:30
Only one doubt in (B).However, it is the best option.

These are positive measures, but they have been tried before, to little avail. A better plan to reverse the population decline is to improve the country's governance in both the public and the private sphere.

How the portion in red undermines the alternative to analyst's proposal.

IMHO, it only undermines past proposals and not the alternative plans.

_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Kudos [?]: 912 [0], given: 322

Re: Political Analyst: After the Soviet Union collapsed, some hoped that f   [#permalink] 02 Mar 2013, 04:30

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 40 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by