It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 14:50

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 127

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 0

Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2008, 11:02
19
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (02:07) correct 45% (01:53) wrong based on 878 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug plans that would allow individuals significant choice in determining their benefits and costs are deceptively appealing to numerous stakeholders. However, buying prescription drug coverage, like buying health insurance coverage, is not like buying a car. The consumer cannot predict his or her future health needs. Moreover, the administrators of the choice-based drug plans under consideration are allowed to change the drugs they cover and the prices they charge at any time; this renders informed consumer choice meaningless and makes securing appropriate coverage a crap shoot. Older and disabled individuals, the predominant consumers of government subsidized prescription drug plans, should be offered drug coverage alternatives that do not force them to gamble with their health.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A.The first is a fact that the candidate argues against; the second is the ultimate claim that the candidate supports.
B.The first is an observation which the candidate acknowledges as true but to which he is ultimately opposed; the second is a claim that the candidate uses as evidence to support his ultimate position.
C.The first is an observation that the candidate acknowledges as true but unfortunate; the second is an assertion that the candidate makes to support his ultimate position.
D.The first is an observation that the candidate argues against; the second is an observation that the candidate supports.
E.The first is an observation made by the candidate; the second is an assertion that the candidate ultimately opposes.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 0

BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 556

Kudos [?]: 988 [1], given: 321

GPA: 3.4
WE: General Management (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Nov 2013, 01:19
1
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Bumping for review and further disscussion

_________________

General Mistakes to Avoid on the GMAT
TOP 10 articles on Time Management on the GMAT
Thanks = Kudos. Kudos are appreciated

Rules for posting on the verbal forum

Kudos [?]: 988 [1], given: 321

Director
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 653

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2008, 11:27
yavasani wrote:
Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug plans that would allow individuals significant choice in determining their benefits and costs are deceptively appealing to numerous stakeholders. However, buying prescription drug coverage, like buying health insurance coverage, is not like buying a car. The consumer cannot predict his or her future health needs. Moreover, the administrators of the choice-based drug plans under consideration are allowed to change the drugs they cover and the prices they charge at any time; this renders informed consumer choice meaningless and makes securing appropriate coverage a crap shoot. Older and disabled individuals, the predominant consumers of government subsidized prescription drug plans, should be offered drug coverage alternatives that do not force them to gamble with their health.

The buyer may or may not the same diseases in future. Therefore, rather than subsidizing the prescription drug plans, government should offer some coverage alternatives.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A.The first is a fact that the candidate argues against; the second is the ultimate claim that the candidate supports.

Wrong. The ultimate claim is that this is not an effective way. Goverment should some alternative drug coverage plan.

B.The first is an observation which the candidate acknowledges as true but to which he is ultimately opposed; the second is a claim that the candidate uses as evidence to support his ultimate position.

Close but wrong. The observation is true government plan but author is against it. But author is using "The consumer cannot predict his or her future health needs" assertion to make the cliam that this is not a good plan. Use some alternative...drug coverage plan

C.The first is an observation that the candidate acknowledges as true but unfortunate; the second is an assertion that the candidate makes to support his ultimate position.

Correct. Second "consumer cannot predict his or her future health needs" is the asertion that author is making to support his claim.

D.The first is an observation that the candidate argues against; the second is an observation that the candidate supports.

Wrong. Second is not an observation.

E.The first is an observation made by the candidate; the second is an assertion that the candidate ultimately opposes.

Wrong. Author is not opposing second.

IMO C but very confused between B and C

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 7

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 322

Kudos [?]: 392 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2008, 11:45
IMO C. The first is an observation that the candidate acknowledges as true but unfortunate; the second is an assertion that the candidate makes to support his ultimate position.

Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug plans that would allow individuals significant choice in determining their benefits and costs are deceptively appealing to numerous stakeholders. The candidate agrees that the drug plan would allow individuals significant choice (TRUE) but it is deceptively appealing (unfortunate).

The consumer cannot predict his or her future health needs.. This is an assertion because the next sentence strats with "moreover" and instroduces more seertion. "Moreover, the administrators of the choice-based drug plans under consideration are allowed to change the drugs they cover and the prices they charge at any time;

Conclusion in the passage is: this renders informed consumer choice meaningless and makes securing appropriate coverage a crap shoot. Older and disabled individuals, the predominant consumers of government subsidized prescription drug plans, should be offered drug coverage alternatives that do not force them to gamble with their health.

Kudos [?]: 392 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 934

Kudos [?]: 354 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2008, 11:50
IMO D.
But C is also really close.

Kudos [?]: 354 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 653

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2008, 12:02
x97agarwal wrote:
IMO C. The first is an observation that the candidate acknowledges as true but unfortunate; the second is an assertion that the candidate makes to support his ultimate position.

Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug plans that would allow individuals significant choice in determining their benefits and costs are deceptively appealing to numerous stakeholders. The candidate agrees that the drug plan would allow individuals significant choice (TRUE) but it is deceptively appealing (unfortunate).

The consumer cannot predict his or her future health needs.. This is an assertion because the next sentence strats with "moreover" and instroduces more seertion. "Moreover, the administrators of the choice-based drug plans under consideration are allowed to change the drugs they cover and the prices they charge at any time;

Conclusion in the passage is: this renders informed consumer choice meaningless and makes securing appropriate coverage a crap shoot. Older and disabled individuals, the predominant consumers of government subsidized prescription drug plans, should be offered drug coverage alternatives that do not force them to gamble with their health.

Why B is wonrg? What is the main diff between conclusion and assertion?

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 7

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 322

Kudos [?]: 392 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2008, 12:29
rao_1857 wrote:
x97agarwal wrote:
IMO C. The first is an observation that the candidate acknowledges as true but unfortunate; the second is an assertion that the candidate makes to support his ultimate position.

Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug plans that would allow individuals significant choice in determining their benefits and costs are deceptively appealing to numerous stakeholders. The candidate agrees that the drug plan would allow individuals significant choice (TRUE) but it is deceptively appealing (unfortunate).

The consumer cannot predict his or her future health needs.. This is an assertion because the next sentence strats with "moreover" and instroduces more seertion. "Moreover, the administrators of the choice-based drug plans under consideration are allowed to change the drugs they cover and the prices they charge at any time;

Conclusion in the passage is: this renders informed consumer choice meaningless and makes securing appropriate coverage a crap shoot. Older and disabled individuals, the predominant consumers of government subsidized prescription drug plans, should be offered drug coverage alternatives that do not force them to gamble with their health.

Why B is wonrg? What is the main diff between conclusion and assertion?

Good Question Rao. In the first bold face the second part is wrong - it is not an evidence.

Kudos [?]: 392 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3345

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 2

Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2008, 13:25
i dont think D is correct..the second part is not an observation but an assertion..this is the view of the politician and he wants you to believe it..

therfore C is best

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 2

SVP
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1543

Kudos [?]: 185 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2008, 13:36
I am with fresinha .... i went with C because the second boldface is really an assertion

Kudos [?]: 185 [0], given: 2

Director
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 653

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2008, 13:49
pmenon wrote:
I am with fresinha .... i went with C because the second boldface is really an assertion

Hi All,

Still confused ......

What is the main diff between conclusion and assertion?????

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 7

VP
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1378

Kudos [?]: 1703 [0], given: 62

Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2012, 07:32
Though I am a bit late, my assessment of C is that nowhere the first boldface has been proclaimed as unfortunate.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1703 [0], given: 62

Intern
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 48

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 11

Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Dec 2012, 09:46
B for me. In C, I don't think the first bold face is unfortunate. B is clearer.

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 11

Manager
Joined: 23 May 2013
Posts: 122

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 110

Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2014, 08:45
how can we conclude that first bold face is unfortunate? Can some expert please explain how to eliminate B?
_________________

“Confidence comes not from always being right but from not fearing to be wrong.”

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 110

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 May 2013
Posts: 353

Kudos [?]: 151 [0], given: 70

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
Schools: XLRI GM"18
GPA: 4
WE: Human Resources (Human Resources)
Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2014, 08:59
the first BF is a fact about a plan. the author does not acknowledge its benefit......critical of its implementation... not opposed to it.....

the second is BF supports the conclusion by the author.

hence IMO"C".

Kudos [?]: 151 [0], given: 70

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10146

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Mar 2015, 23:41
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 357

Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jun 2015, 08:35
I had a doubt here. Aren't the options C and B too close for comfort? Can we expect something like this in GMAT? I mean using the word unfortunate in C kind of baffled me. I don't think the author thinks it's unfortunate. If someone could help. Thanks

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 357

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10146

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Aug 2016, 04:27
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

CR Forum Moderator
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 471

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 191

Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2017, 00:26
natashakumar91 wrote:
I had a doubt here. Aren't the options C and B too close for comfort? Can we expect something like this in GMAT? I mean using the word unfortunate in C kind of baffled me. I don't think the author thinks it's unfortunate. If someone could help. Thanks

Though I am not expert, below is my understanding:

It is unfortunate because it deceptively appealing to numerous stakeholders NOT literally appealing to numerous stakeholders.

P.S.:I was also in a problem to understand how it is unfortunate.
_________________

Hasan Mahmud

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 191

Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2015
Posts: 98

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 80

Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Feb 2017, 13:59
Hi experts, I'm not able to understand difference between B and C? Both seem same.
Thanks

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 80

Verbal Expert
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3197

Kudos [?]: 3504 [0], given: 22

Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2017, 07:15
rakaisraka wrote:
Hi experts, I'm not able to understand difference between B and C? Both seem same.
Thanks

"Opposed to" can be interpreted as "not agreeing". Thus in option B the statement about BF1 beomes self-conflicting.

As for C, it is not convincing that an event is "unfortunate" because it is "deceptively appealing".

Thus, I find neither of the options up to the GMAT mark to qualify as the clear, correct answer.

Kudos [?]: 3504 [0], given: 22

Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug   [#permalink] 06 Feb 2017, 07:15

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 21 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by