It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 14:50

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 127

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 0

Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2008, 11:02
19
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (02:07) correct 45% (01:53) wrong based on 878 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug plans that would allow individuals significant choice in determining their benefits and costs are deceptively appealing to numerous stakeholders. However, buying prescription drug coverage, like buying health insurance coverage, is not like buying a car. The consumer cannot predict his or her future health needs. Moreover, the administrators of the choice-based drug plans under consideration are allowed to change the drugs they cover and the prices they charge at any time; this renders informed consumer choice meaningless and makes securing appropriate coverage a crap shoot. Older and disabled individuals, the predominant consumers of government subsidized prescription drug plans, should be offered drug coverage alternatives that do not force them to gamble with their health.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A.The first is a fact that the candidate argues against; the second is the ultimate claim that the candidate supports.
B.The first is an observation which the candidate acknowledges as true but to which he is ultimately opposed; the second is a claim that the candidate uses as evidence to support his ultimate position.
C.The first is an observation that the candidate acknowledges as true but unfortunate; the second is an assertion that the candidate makes to support his ultimate position.
D.The first is an observation that the candidate argues against; the second is an observation that the candidate supports.
E.The first is an observation made by the candidate; the second is an assertion that the candidate ultimately opposes.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 84 [0], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 556

Kudos [?]: 988 [1], given: 321

GPA: 3.4
WE: General Management (Non-Profit and Government)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Nov 2013, 01:19
1
This post received
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED

Kudos [?]: 988 [1], given: 321

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 653

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 7

Re: CR: Bold Face [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2008, 11:27
yavasani wrote:
Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug plans that would allow individuals significant choice in determining their benefits and costs are deceptively appealing to numerous stakeholders. However, buying prescription drug coverage, like buying health insurance coverage, is not like buying a car. The consumer cannot predict his or her future health needs. Moreover, the administrators of the choice-based drug plans under consideration are allowed to change the drugs they cover and the prices they charge at any time; this renders informed consumer choice meaningless and makes securing appropriate coverage a crap shoot. Older and disabled individuals, the predominant consumers of government subsidized prescription drug plans, should be offered drug coverage alternatives that do not force them to gamble with their health.

The buyer may or may not the same diseases in future. Therefore, rather than subsidizing the prescription drug plans, government should offer some coverage alternatives.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

A.The first is a fact that the candidate argues against; the second is the ultimate claim that the candidate supports.

Wrong. The ultimate claim is that this is not an effective way. Goverment should some alternative drug coverage plan.

B.The first is an observation which the candidate acknowledges as true but to which he is ultimately opposed; the second is a claim that the candidate uses as evidence to support his ultimate position.

Close but wrong. The observation is true government plan but author is against it. But author is using "The consumer cannot predict his or her future health needs" assertion to make the cliam that this is not a good plan. Use some alternative...drug coverage plan

C.The first is an observation that the candidate acknowledges as true but unfortunate; the second is an assertion that the candidate makes to support his ultimate position.

Correct. Second "consumer cannot predict his or her future health needs" is the asertion that author is making to support his claim.

D.The first is an observation that the candidate argues against; the second is an observation that the candidate supports.

Wrong. Second is not an observation.

E.The first is an observation made by the candidate; the second is an assertion that the candidate ultimately opposes.

Wrong. Author is not opposing second.



IMO C but very confused between B and C

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 7

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 322

Kudos [?]: 392 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Bold Face [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2008, 11:45
IMO C. The first is an observation that the candidate acknowledges as true but unfortunate; the second is an assertion that the candidate makes to support his ultimate position.

Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug plans that would allow individuals significant choice in determining their benefits and costs are deceptively appealing to numerous stakeholders. The candidate agrees that the drug plan would allow individuals significant choice (TRUE) but it is deceptively appealing (unfortunate).

The consumer cannot predict his or her future health needs.. This is an assertion because the next sentence strats with "moreover" and instroduces more seertion. "Moreover, the administrators of the choice-based drug plans under consideration are allowed to change the drugs they cover and the prices they charge at any time;

Conclusion in the passage is: this renders informed consumer choice meaningless and makes securing appropriate coverage a crap shoot. Older and disabled individuals, the predominant consumers of government subsidized prescription drug plans, should be offered drug coverage alternatives that do not force them to gamble with their health.

Kudos [?]: 392 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 10 Sep 2007
Posts: 934

Kudos [?]: 354 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Bold Face [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2008, 11:50
IMO D.
But C is also really close.

Kudos [?]: 354 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 653

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 7

Re: CR: Bold Face [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2008, 12:02
x97agarwal wrote:
IMO C. The first is an observation that the candidate acknowledges as true but unfortunate; the second is an assertion that the candidate makes to support his ultimate position.

Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug plans that would allow individuals significant choice in determining their benefits and costs are deceptively appealing to numerous stakeholders. The candidate agrees that the drug plan would allow individuals significant choice (TRUE) but it is deceptively appealing (unfortunate).

The consumer cannot predict his or her future health needs.. This is an assertion because the next sentence strats with "moreover" and instroduces more seertion. "Moreover, the administrators of the choice-based drug plans under consideration are allowed to change the drugs they cover and the prices they charge at any time;

Conclusion in the passage is: this renders informed consumer choice meaningless and makes securing appropriate coverage a crap shoot. Older and disabled individuals, the predominant consumers of government subsidized prescription drug plans, should be offered drug coverage alternatives that do not force them to gamble with their health.



Why B is wonrg? What is the main diff between conclusion and assertion?

Thanks in advance

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 7

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 322

Kudos [?]: 392 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Bold Face [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2008, 12:29
rao_1857 wrote:
x97agarwal wrote:
IMO C. The first is an observation that the candidate acknowledges as true but unfortunate; the second is an assertion that the candidate makes to support his ultimate position.

Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug plans that would allow individuals significant choice in determining their benefits and costs are deceptively appealing to numerous stakeholders. The candidate agrees that the drug plan would allow individuals significant choice (TRUE) but it is deceptively appealing (unfortunate).

The consumer cannot predict his or her future health needs.. This is an assertion because the next sentence strats with "moreover" and instroduces more seertion. "Moreover, the administrators of the choice-based drug plans under consideration are allowed to change the drugs they cover and the prices they charge at any time;

Conclusion in the passage is: this renders informed consumer choice meaningless and makes securing appropriate coverage a crap shoot. Older and disabled individuals, the predominant consumers of government subsidized prescription drug plans, should be offered drug coverage alternatives that do not force them to gamble with their health.



Why B is wonrg? What is the main diff between conclusion and assertion?

Thanks in advance


Good Question Rao. In the first bold face the second part is wrong - it is not an evidence.

Kudos [?]: 392 [0], given: 0

Current Student
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2004
Posts: 3345

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 2

Location: New York City
Schools: Wharton'11 HBS'12
Re: CR: Bold Face [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2008, 13:25
i dont think D is correct..the second part is not an observation but an assertion..this is the view of the politician and he wants you to believe it..

therfore C is best

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 2

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 1543

Kudos [?]: 185 [0], given: 2

Re: CR: Bold Face [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2008, 13:36
I am with fresinha .... i went with C because the second boldface is really an assertion

Kudos [?]: 185 [0], given: 2

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 653

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 7

Re: CR: Bold Face [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Jul 2008, 13:49
pmenon wrote:
I am with fresinha .... i went with C because the second boldface is really an assertion


Hi All,

Still confused ......

What is the main diff between conclusion and assertion?????

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 7

VP
VP
User avatar
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 1378

Kudos [?]: 1703 [0], given: 62

Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Nov 2012, 07:32
Though I am a bit late, my assessment of C is that nowhere the first boldface has been proclaimed as unfortunate.
_________________

Prepositional Phrases Clarified|Elimination of BEING| Absolute Phrases Clarified
Rules For Posting
www.Univ-Scholarships.com

Kudos [?]: 1703 [0], given: 62

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 15 Apr 2010
Posts: 48

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 11

Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Dec 2012, 09:46
B for me. In C, I don't think the first bold face is unfortunate. B is clearer.

Kudos [?]: 33 [0], given: 11

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2013
Posts: 122

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 110

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jan 2014, 08:45
how can we conclude that first bold face is unfortunate? Can some expert please explain how to eliminate B?
_________________

“Confidence comes not from always being right but from not fearing to be wrong.”

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 110

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 04 May 2013
Posts: 353

Kudos [?]: 151 [0], given: 70

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
Schools: XLRI GM"18
GPA: 4
WE: Human Resources (Human Resources)
Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jan 2014, 08:59
the first BF is a fact about a plan. the author does not acknowledge its benefit......critical of its implementation... not opposed to it.....

the second is BF supports the conclusion by the author.

hence IMO"C".

Kudos [?]: 151 [0], given: 70

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10146

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Mar 2015, 23:41
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 07 Aug 2012
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 357

Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2015, 08:35
I had a doubt here. Aren't the options C and B too close for comfort? Can we expect something like this in GMAT? I mean using the word unfortunate in C kind of baffled me. I don't think the author thinks it's unfortunate. If someone could help. Thanks :)

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 357

Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10146

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Premium Member
Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Aug 2016, 04:27
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

CR Forum Moderator
avatar
P
Status: The best is yet to come.....
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 471

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 191

GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Feb 2017, 00:26
natashakumar91 wrote:
I had a doubt here. Aren't the options C and B too close for comfort? Can we expect something like this in GMAT? I mean using the word unfortunate in C kind of baffled me. I don't think the author thinks it's unfortunate. If someone could help. Thanks :)



Though I am not expert, below is my understanding:

It is unfortunate because it deceptively appealing to numerous stakeholders NOT literally appealing to numerous stakeholders.

P.S.:I was also in a problem to understand how it is unfortunate.
_________________

Hasan Mahmud

Kudos [?]: 198 [0], given: 191

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 27 Aug 2015
Posts: 98

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 80

Re: Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Feb 2017, 13:59
Hi experts, I'm not able to understand difference between B and C? Both seem same.
Thanks

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 80

Expert Post
Verbal Expert
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3197

Kudos [?]: 3504 [0], given: 22

Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Feb 2017, 07:15
rakaisraka wrote:
Hi experts, I'm not able to understand difference between B and C? Both seem same.
Thanks


"Opposed to" can be interpreted as "not agreeing". Thus in option B the statement about BF1 beomes self-conflicting.

As for C, it is not convincing that an event is "unfortunate" because it is "deceptively appealing".

Thus, I find neither of the options up to the GMAT mark to qualify as the clear, correct answer.

Kudos [?]: 3504 [0], given: 22

Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug   [#permalink] 06 Feb 2017, 07:15

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 21 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Political Candidate: Government subsidized prescription drug

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.