It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 22:11

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Political opinion and analysis outside the mainstream rarely

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4285

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

Political opinion and analysis outside the mainstream rarely [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2004, 14:14
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

40% (02:31) correct 60% (00:28) wrong based on 11 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Political opinion and analysis outside the mainstream rarely are found on television talk shows, and it might be thought that this state of affairs is a product of the political agenda of the television stations themselves. In fact, television stations are driven by the same economic forces as sellers of more tangible goods. Because they must attempt to capture the largest possible share of the television audience for their shows, they air only those shows that will appeal to large numbers of people. As a result, political opinions and analyses aired on television talk shows are typically bland and innocuous.

An assumption made in the explanation offered by the author of the passage is that

A. most television viewers cannot agree on which elements of a particular opinion or analysis are most disturbing.
B. there are television viewers who might refuse to watch television talk shows that they knew would be controversial and disturbing.
C. each television viewer holds some opinion that is outside the political mainstream, but those opinions are not the same for everyone.
D. there are television shows on which economic forces have an even greater impact than they do on television talk shows.
E. the television talk shows of different stations resemble one another in most respects.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 292

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Location: US

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2004, 14:19
E.

"the television talk shows of different stations resemble one another in most respects."

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 03 Jul 2003
Posts: 651

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2004, 14:22
Another curve ball

I was debating between A and B.

I would choose B.

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Sep 2003
Posts: 292

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Location: US

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2004, 14:24
HA,

Kpadma is very right.

I change my answer from E to B. I didn't even read B well.

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 15 Mar 2004
Posts: 155

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Location: New York

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2004, 14:35
I was tempted to go with E, but I C is my answer. E is good, the only problem is I am not certain that it is an assumption. The author explicitely states "stations are driven by the same forces in most respects."

C. each television viewer holds some opinion that is outside the political mainstream, but those opinions are not the same for everyone. IMO we have to assume this in order for the Argument to stand. What if those opinions are the same for everyone, then the logis, that polical opinions and analysis do not air b/c of the reason(s) listed, is invalid,

As much as I like E, C would be my answer!
_________________

---------------------------------------------------
The more I learn, the more I realize I know nothing!
----------------------------------------------------

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 15 Mar 2004
Posts: 155

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Location: New York

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2004, 14:41
B was also a contender on my list, I'll keep C!
_________________

---------------------------------------------------
The more I learn, the more I realize I know nothing!
----------------------------------------------------

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 27 Feb 2004
Posts: 185

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Location: illinois

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2004, 14:43
The debate is between B and C...I will go or B....

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2004, 17:20
Yes indeed! B and C are the contenders.

I will go with C on this one. If you negate B as

there are no television viewers who might refuse to watch television talk shows that they knew would be controversial and disturbing.
This negation does not weaken the argument at all.

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4285

Kudos [?]: 528 [1], given: 0

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2004, 18:25
1
KUDOS
OA is B.
B) Negating B actually destroys the argument. If there are NO television viewers who might refuse to watch television talk shows that they knew would be controversial and disturbing, then what is the point of airing only those shows that will appeal to large numbers of people to capture the largest possible share of the television audience? TV stations could show just anything on TV and people would NOT refuse to watch it. Their rating would be high no matter what they show and the argument of not airing non-mainstream ideas would be destroyed.
C) Negating C actually supports the argument. Say everyone's idea is the same. Then it strenghtens the argument that ALL people will be offended by such showing and those people will not watch such shows. Since all people will not watch non-mainstream shows, TV stations' ratings will suffer. Thus, negating C will support the argument and C is NOT an assumption.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 528 [1], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1788

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Location: NewJersey USA

### Show Tags

05 Apr 2004, 19:03
Hell Yeah. I just overlooked "refuse"

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 23 Aug 2003
Posts: 460

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

Location: In the middle of nowhere

### Show Tags

06 Apr 2004, 06:21
Nice explanation Paul...as most of the guys even I chose C.

Vivek.
_________________

"Start By Doing What Is Necessary ,Then What Is Possible & Suddenly You Will Realise That You Are Doing The Impossible"

Kudos [?]: 27 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10120

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 0

Re: Political opinion and analysis outside the mainstream rarely [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Feb 2017, 05:25
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 262 [0], given: 0

Re: Political opinion and analysis outside the mainstream rarely   [#permalink] 24 Feb 2017, 05:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Political opinion and analysis outside the mainstream rarely

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.