Politician: From the time our party took office almost four : GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 Feb 2017, 00:36

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Politician: From the time our party took office almost four

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1793
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 0

Politician: From the time our party took office almost four [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jan 2004, 10:20
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (01:47) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

22. Politician: From the time our party took office almost four years ago the number of people unemployed city-wide increased by less than 20 percent. The opposition party controlled city government during the four preceding years, and the number of unemployed city residents rose by over 20 percent. Thus, due to our leadership, fewer people now find themselves among the ranks of the unemployed, whatever the opposition may claim.

The reasoning in the politician┬б┬пs argument is most vulnerable to the criticism that

(A) the claims made by the opposition are simply dismissed without being specified

(B) no evidence has been offered to show that any decline in unemployment over the past four years was uniform throughout all areas of the city

(C) the issue of how much unemployment in the city is affected by seasonal fluctuations is ignored

(D) the evidence cited in support of the conclusion actually provides more support for the denial of the conclusion

(E) the possibility has not been addressed that any increase in the number of people employed is due to programs supported by the opposition party.
If you have any questions
you can ask an expert
New!
Director
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 501
Location: 55405
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Jan 2004, 11:48
This is a goofy question.

From the time our party took office ... the number of people unemployed city-wide increased by less than 20 percent.

So the number of unemployed people grew pretty fast.

The opposition party controlled city government during the preceding years, and the number of unemployed city residents rose by over 20 percent.

So the number of unemployed people grew really fast.

Thus, due to our leadership, fewer people now find themselves among the ranks of the unemployed,

This is patently false. The first statement says the the number of unemployed grew!!

Gotta be D.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4302
Followers: 40

Kudos [?]: 438 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Jan 2004, 12:22
Dang, you are right again! I am ashamed
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1793
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Jan 2004, 16:06
Answer is D.
I cannot understand stoolfi's explaination. In both the cases unemployment increased, but slowly when the new party came to power. How can it support the denial of the claim. Does it mean that rate at which people are unemployed has actually slowed down.
I hope some one can explain this more.
Director
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
Posts: 501
Location: 55405
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Jan 2004, 16:18
anand-- You complain when we don't explain our answers, and you complain when we do. Therefore, anandk is insatiable.

Trying again:

The politician claims that " fewer people now find themselves among the ranks of the unemployed"

But the number of unemployed rose: "From the time our party took office... the number of people unemployed... increased by less than 20 percent."

These statements are completely incompatible!

If the politician had said "the percentage growth in the number of unemployed has slowed under our administration" he'd be correct. But he said the there were fewer unemployed people, when in fact the number of people unemployed... increased by less than 20 percent."
SVP
Joined: 30 Oct 2003
Posts: 1793
Location: NewJersey USA
Followers: 6

Kudos [?]: 100 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Jan 2004, 17:04

Yeah. I got the explaination right this time. Thanks for your effort stoolfi.
03 Jan 2004, 17:04
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
6 Politician: My opponent says our zoning laws too strongly 9 12 Aug 2012, 17:10
15 Politician: Since my administration has entered office, the 10 06 Jun 2011, 00:14
5 Politician: From the time our party took office almost four 13 08 Feb 2010, 07:24
15 Personnel officer: The exorbitant cost of our 12 14 Oct 2007, 08:18
Politician: From the time our party took office almost four 6 22 Mar 2007, 07:05
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Politician: From the time our party took office almost four

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.