Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 03:51 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 03:51

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Difficulty: 555-605 Levelx   Resolve Paradoxx                        
Show Tags
Hide Tags
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 45
Own Kudos [?]: 6618 [259]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4347
Own Kudos [?]: 30790 [88]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 10 May 2012
Posts: 30
Own Kudos [?]: 82 [14]
Given Kudos: 3
Send PM
General Discussion
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Mar 2010
Status:Final Countdown
Posts: 320
Own Kudos [?]: 1305 [1]
Given Kudos: 76
Location: United States (NY)
GPA: 3.82
WE:Account Management (Retail Banking)
Send PM
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier [#permalink]
1
Kudos
straight (B)
(B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 11 May 2012
Status:Juggg..Jugggg Go!
Posts: 159
Own Kudos [?]: 98 [11]
Given Kudos: 239
Location: India
GC Meter: A.W.E.S.O.M.E
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 620 Q46 V30
GMAT 2: 720 Q50 V38
Send PM
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier [#permalink]
8
Kudos
3
Bookmarks
betterscore wrote:
As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier than concrete. Moreover, in tropical areas bamboo is a much less expensive construction material than either steel or concrete and is always readily available. In tropical areas, therefore, building with bamboo makes better economic sense than building with steel or concrete, except where land values are high.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the exception noted above?

(A) Buildings constructed of bamboo are less likely to suffer earthquake damage than are steel and concrete buildings.
(B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings.
(C) In order to protect it from being damaged by termites and beetles, bamboo must be soaked, at some expense, in a preservative.
(D) In some tropical areas, bamboo is used to make the scaffolding that is used during large construction projects.
(E) Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often


Its important to note that, answering a verbal question is more like negating all the wrong answers.

stimulus: bamboo strong as steel and sturdier than concrete, tropic areas they are < expensive. So, where land values are high,we cannot use bamboo.
But using bamboo should be economical. But why not?
a. earthquake - irrelevant. question is clearly talking about economical and bamboos
b. Bamboo unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings. - could make sense. Higher land values, more multistory buildings. No bamboo. explains.
c. again irrelevant - [you cannot connect termites with high land values]
d. so what they use for scaffolding. it still doesnt talk about constructing buildings.
e. again irrelevant - so if land values are increasing and bamboo growing. doesnt talk about bamboo being used for constructing buildings

Please also note in such type of questions - the above is explained by which of the following types, usually NEW INFORMATION is better suited.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 24 Sep 2008
Posts: 126
Own Kudos [?]: 1074 [3]
Given Kudos: 7
Schools:MIT / INSEAD / IIM - ABC
 Q48  V32
GPA: 3.6
Send PM
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier [#permalink]
3
Kudos
I picked up C over B, because thought, ther is an additional cost, so high land values + additional expense => could be a deterrrent for using bamboo on high value lands

Now, i see that "some" is not a favorable "adj" to be chosen as a correct option

Cheers
GODSPEED
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2011
Posts: 91
Own Kudos [?]: 159 [6]
Given Kudos: 22
Send PM
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier [#permalink]
6
Kudos
Bamboo is stronger than steel and strudier than concrete. In tropical areas, bamboo is cheap and readily available. Hence this is a good option to build expect when land values are high.

When land values are high, it is always a viable option to build multi-storeyed buildings to provide more living area.

B. Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings - Provides the link to connect premise and conclusion. - Correct
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 587
Own Kudos [?]: 3156 [7]
Given Kudos: 322
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE:Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier [#permalink]
7
Kudos
Somehow,I am not at all with the solution that OG gave:

Following is an extract from OG-13 Solution Q94:
Multistory buildings are particularly desirable in areas where land values are high, but
bamboo may not be suitable for such buildings.


Now where in the stimulus there is mention of the above reasoning ?

It is just that we are assuming and that isn't allowed in GMAT CR?

Plz Advice

Rgds,
TGC
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 07 Nov 2012
Posts: 222
Own Kudos [?]: 912 [3]
Given Kudos: 4
Schools: LBS '14 (A$)
GMAT 1: 770 Q48 V48
Send PM
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier [#permalink]
1
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Hi Target,

It is given in the answer 'B', the whole point of this sort of question is evaluating which of the options provides EXTRA information that helps explain the paradox in the passage.

So which of the answers A-E gives additional info that would explain why Bamboo is not used. Answer B does that so is correct.

James
User avatar
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 587
Own Kudos [?]: 3156 [40]
Given Kudos: 322
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE:Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Send PM
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier [#permalink]
39
Kudos
Sorry to say still nobody has answered my query.

In tropical areas, therefore, building with bamboo makes better economic sense than building with steel or concrete, except where land values are high.

Paradox is even if BAMBOO makes economic sense then why IT is not used in where land values are high

(B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings.

How can we assume here that places where LAND VALUES ARE HIGH we will find MULTISTORY BUILDINGS.

Places where LAND VALUES are high can be the places where there are BUNGALOWS or may be the land values could be high because "Very important People" are living there.

How could we relate HIGH LAND VALUES with MULTISTORY.

I contradict the reasoning of common sense as given by other members in this post.

Plz Advice !!

Rgds,
TGC
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Dec 2012
Posts: 55
Own Kudos [?]: 1328 [4]
Given Kudos: 31
Location: United Kingdom
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
Send PM
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier [#permalink]
4
Kudos
targetgmatchotu wrote:
Sorry to say still nobody has answered my query.

In tropical areas, therefore, building with bamboo makes better economic sense than building with steel or concrete, except where land values are high.

Paradox is even if BAMBOO makes economic sense then why IT is not used in where land values are high

(B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings.

How can we assume here that places where LAND VALUES ARE HIGH we will find MULTISTORY BUILDINGS.

Places where LAND VALUES are high can be the places where there are BUNGALOWS or may be the land values could be high because "Very important People" are living there.

How could we relate HIGH LAND VALUES with MULTISTORY.

I contradict the reasoning of common sense as given by other members in this post.

Plz Advice !!

Rgds,
TGC


I sort of agree with your reasoning that high land values does always equate to multi-storey, for example not every building in Monte Carlo (one of THE most expensive places per sqft in the world) is a multi-storey building. So yes, although it may seem like a logical conclusion, it is not a given that high land values equates to only multi-storey buildings. BUT, looking at all the other options you will have to select a possible answer.

I suppose GMAT is also testing your skill of eliminating the wrong choices and in this case after the process of elimination you are left with B. It may not be the best possible answer but of the 5 choices it is.

Hope that makes sense.
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 193
Own Kudos [?]: 610 [2]
Given Kudos: 12
Send PM
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier [#permalink]
1
Kudos
betterscore wrote:
As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier than concrete. Moreover, in tropical areas bamboo is a much less expensive construction material than either steel or concrete and is always readily available. In tropical areas, therefore, building with bamboo makes better economic sense than building with steel or concrete, except where land values are high.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the exception noted above?

(A) Buildings constructed of bamboo are less likely to suffer earthquake damage than are steel and concrete buildings.
(B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings.
(C) In order to protect it from being damaged by termites and beetles, bamboo must be soaked, at some expense, in a preservative.
(D) In some tropical areas, bamboo is used to make the scaffolding that is used during large construction projects.
(E) Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often


I haven't seen such a question type where the GMAT boldly asks you to think why for a particular argument.
A) Strengthens the case.
B) Bingo ! this has high probability of being the answer.
C)hmm..doesn't answer our case. Irrelevant.
D)Doesn't answer out question in any way. Out.
E)Incomplete Answer choice.

B wins.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 06 Jun 2012
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 9 [4]
Given Kudos: 0
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Schools: Booth '18
Send PM
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier [#permalink]
4
Kudos
I don't know whether my reply still counts or not. But why has everyone rejected Option E. The question clearly states:

"Moreover, in tropical areas bamboo is a much less expensive construction material than either steel or concrete and is always readily available."

"Is readily available".So if Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often cleared to make way for construction means Bamboo is not available readily. Hence it is not viable to use.

This makes more sense to me rather than simply assuming high land value = multi storey building.






Bluelagoon wrote:
betterscore wrote:
As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier than concrete. Moreover, in tropical areas bamboo is a much less expensive construction material than either steel or concrete and is always readily available. In tropical areas, therefore, building with bamboo makes better economic sense than building with steel or concrete, except where land values are high.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the exception noted above?

(A) Buildings constructed of bamboo are less likely to suffer earthquake damage than are steel and concrete buildings.
(B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings.
(C) In order to protect it from being damaged by termites and beetles, bamboo must be soaked, at some expense, in a preservative.
(D) In some tropical areas, bamboo is used to make the scaffolding that is used during large construction projects.
(E) Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often


I haven't seen such a question type where the GMAT boldly asks you to think why for a particular argument.
A) Strengthens the case.
B) Bingo ! this has high probability of being the answer.
C)hmm..doesn't answer our case. Irrelevant.
D)Doesn't answer out question in any way. Out.
E)Incomplete Answer choice.

B wins.
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 4347
Own Kudos [?]: 30790 [12]
Given Kudos: 635
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Send PM
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier [#permalink]
7
Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
tkull wrote:
I don't know whether my reply still counts or not. But why has everyone rejected Option E. The question clearly states:

"Moreover, in tropical areas bamboo is a much less expensive construction material than either steel or concrete and is always readily available."

"Is readily available".So if Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often cleared to make way for construction means Bamboo is not available readily. Hence it is not viable to use.

This makes more sense to me rather than simply assuming high land value = multi storey building.


The problem with your logic is that you are going against the premise, a thing that is not allowed in GMAT. When the premise says that "bamboo is always readily available", an option statement indicating something against it is wrong for the reason that it contradicts the passage.

In addition, this is an official question and the official answer is B, so if you think E is correct, you think GMAC is wrong - not a fruitful way to approach GMAT.

Thanks,
Chiranjeev
User avatar
Jamboree GMAT Instructor
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Status:GMAT Expert
Affiliations: Jamboree Education Pvt Ltd
Posts: 252
Own Kudos [?]: 654 [3]
Given Kudos: 1
Location: India
Send PM
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier [#permalink]
3
Kudos
In this argument all points have been given in favor of Bamboo except that it cannot be used in places where land values are high. We need to find out why that is the case. This is a paradox question. Hence as "B" suggests in places where land values are high, buildings with multiple floors are constructed and since Bamboo is not suitable for such buildings it is not used. "E" does not resolve the paradox rather makes it more complicated.Bamboo can be cleared for multiple purpose but that does not clarify why is it unsuitable for building purpose.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Posts: 484
Own Kudos [?]: 2335 [1]
Given Kudos: 36
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
Send PM
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier [#permalink]
1
Kudos
betterscore wrote:
As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier than concrete. Moreover, in tropical areas bamboo is a much less expensive construction material than either steel or concrete and is always readily available. In tropical areas, therefore, building with bamboo makes better economic sense than building with steel or concrete, except where land values are high.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the exception noted above?

(A) Buildings constructed of bamboo are less likely to suffer earthquake damage than are steel and concrete buildings.
(B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings.
(C) In order to protect it from being damaged b[y termites and beetles, bamboo must be soaked, at some expense, in a preservative.
(D) In some tropical areas, bamboo is used to make the scaffolding that is used during large construction projects.
(E) Bamboo growing in an area where land values are increasing is often cleared to make way for construction.


Answer is B

Stimulus tells us that when land price is high then bamboo is NOT suitable.
Option B tells us why it should not used. -Because when land is expensive, it makes sense to make multi-storey buildings to get maximum value of that land.

BAMBOO CANNOT BE USED TO MAKE MULTI STOREY BUILDING; therefore it is an exception for areas with high land price.
B) Bamboo is unsuitable as a building material for multistory buildings.

THEREFORE B IS THE CORRECT ANSWER.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 1
Send PM
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier [#permalink]
I selected option E as clearing the bamboo from a bamboo growing area, makes it less available, hence, negating the situation.

Why would this logic not work?

Posted from my mobile device
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Posts: 3600
Own Kudos [?]: 5425 [4]
Given Kudos: 346
Send PM
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier [#permalink]
4
Kudos
Expert Reply
sahilsbakshi wrote:
I selected option E as clearing the bamboo from a bamboo growing area, makes it less available, hence, negating the situation.

Why would this logic not work?

Posted from my mobile device


Hi sahilsbakshi ,

The argument has clearly mentioned that Bamboo is readily available. Now, if I consider your point true, It means I am trying to break the premise. This is strictly not allowed.

The argument is actually all about constructing economically cheap homes in one area while not the same in another.

We need to find out the reason for that. Your point is no where telling us the point we are looking for.

Does that make sense?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 Oct 2017
Posts: 6
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier [#permalink]
I have no problems with option B but why not Option E, option E will not be economically sensible
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6920
Own Kudos [?]: 63663 [10]
Given Kudos: 1773
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier [#permalink]
8
Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
monidip1010 wrote:
I have no problems with option B but why not Option E, option E will not be economically sensible

The last few posts by abhishekdadarwal2009, abhimahna, and akshayk address option (E) specifically, so please review those replies before posting further questions.

We are trying to explain why BUILDING with bamboo does NOT make better economic sense where land values are high. The source of the bamboo is irrelevant in explaining this exception.

If we want to build in a tropical area, using bamboo usually makes more economic sense REGARDLESS of where that bamboo comes from. In other words, even if we are building in an area where land values are low, the bamboo still might come from places where land values are increasing. The sources might be the same regardless of where we are building. So why is building with bamboo economically viable in most tropical areas but not in areas where land values are high? Only choice (B) explains this exception.

I hope this helps!
GMAT Club Bot
Re: As a construction material, bamboo is as strong as steel and sturdier [#permalink]
 1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne