Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
More and more TTP students are earning 100th percentile scores on the GMAT Focus Edition. The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in your preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way you should study.
Grab 20% off any Target Test Prep GMAT Focus plan during our Flash Sale. Just enter the coupon code FLASH20 at checkout to save up to $320. The offer ends soon.
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
With brand new features like:AI-driven Planner tool, 850+ data Insights practice questions and GMAT Focus Edition Adaptive mock tests with ESR+ analysis and personal mentor support, our course is the most comprehensive course for GMAT Focus Edition.
Join us in a comprehensive talk about the F1 Student Visa process with, Travis Feuerbacher, former U.S. Visa Officers and licensed U.S. immigration attorney having expertise working for the U.S. Department of State....
Mainstream liberal economic theory:
[#permalink]
29 Oct 2015, 19:38
1
Kudos
Mainstream liberal economic theory, which posits that the “invisible hand of the market” will necessarily guarantee the rational and equitable allocation of resources within society, has been called into question in recent decades by proponents of ecological economics. Undermining the very premises upon which the classical theory rests, those who have challenged it point to endemic market failures rooted in externalities, the costs or benefits of economic transactions that are not reflected in the price mechanism. The existence of unaccounted-for externalities, these critics say, prevents markets from realizing their functions optimally. In effect, many of the adverse outcomes of economic activity can be attributed to such hidden costs.
One pioneer of environmental economics is Professor Herman Daly, whose writings expose the fallacy underlying a market system that ignores the impact of externalities on the environment. Economic systems, he claims, are embedded in the natural ecosystem, which sustains them. However, most of the services provided by nature are priced by economists as zero and received by producers for free. For example, if farmers had to pay for the services of the bees that pollinated their crops, the prices of fruit on the market would be much higher. Likewise, if a livestock farmer dumps contaminants into a river, but does not pay for the costs of removing them, the price of meat will not reflect the cost of this activity. Ultimately, unless the principle of “the polluter pays” is insisted upon, society will pay for these externalities, in the dearth of fresh water, or in health hazards.
If markets are to correct these failures, the externalized costs unaccounted for by current pricing mechanisms must be internalized, and the use of natural resources should be taxed for public revenue. This would be an ameliorative step that might restrain some of the trends which are depleting natural capital at the expense of future generations. Nonetheless, a radically new paradigm, which set limits to economic activity, and recognizes that natural resources must not only be paid for, but also conserved, would be required to support a truly sustainable economy.
The primary purpose of the passage is to...
A. Describe the flaws of a conceptual model and propose remedies for its application B. Caution against the misuse of a widely-held theory C. Contrast the results of divergent applications of a model D. Advocate for broader acceptance of a useful hypothesis and describe the consequences of such acceptance E. Undermine the justifications for a revision of a prevalent theory
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Re: Mainstream liberal economic theory:
[#permalink]
30 Oct 2015, 08:51
Key-points of RC
Mainstream liberal economic theory called into question recently by proponents of ecological economics...... adverse outcomes of economic activity
Professor Herman Daly claims that Economic systems are embedded in the natural ecosystem. However, most of the services provided by nature are priced by economists as zero and received by producers for free but society will pay for these externalities.
If markets are to correct these failures, a radically new paradigm would be required to support a truly sustainable economy.
The primary purpose of the passage is to...
A. Describe the flaws of a conceptual model and propose remedies for its application..............correct answer B. Caution against the misuse of a widely-held theory..............This is too broad in scope and apart from caution against theory he also explains it with an example C. Contrast the results of divergent applications of a model..................results of model applications are not compared. D. Advocate for broader acceptance of a useful hypothesis and describe the consequences of such acceptance.........Nowhere the author advocated for broader acceptance of a hypothesis and its consequences. E. Undermine the justifications for a revision of a prevalent theory.............The author does not undermine anything.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
gmatclubot
Re: Mainstream liberal economic theory: [#permalink]