Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 09:19 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 09:19

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Alum
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4341
Own Kudos [?]: 51450 [162]
Given Kudos: 2326
Location: United States (WA)
Concentration: Leadership, General Management
Schools: Ross '20 (M)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
GPA: 3.8
WE:Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63666 [43]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1090
Own Kudos [?]: 1970 [6]
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Send PM
General Discussion
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42104 [1]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: The deer, despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canad [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
Top Contributor
The deer, despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness and being free to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, has struggled to acclimate to the habitat that wildlife biologists had predicted would enable them to thrive.

(A) despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness and being free to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, has struggled --- Note the pronoun 'them' in the non-underlined part. The deer is plural; therefore, 'has struggled' is SV number mismatch

(B) in spite of having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness where it would be free to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, struggled -- do not see any point in the contrast marker 'in spite of'. The Canadian habitat would be helpful not because of their odyssey

(C) despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness that offered freedom to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, had struggled ---- 'The Struggle' was neither earlier nor simultaneous to 'had predicted'. Therefore, use of past perfect 'had struggled' is wrong

(D) after traveling hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness that offered freedom to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, struggles ---The singular 'struggles' is plain wrong.

(E) which traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness where they would be free to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, struggled -- correct choice.
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5265
Own Kudos [?]: 42104 [3]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
Re: The deer, despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canad [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Expert Reply
Top Contributor
VKat
Why not? e.g. The cow, which yielded 15 liters of milk in the competition got the first prize. We can also use 'that' as an alternative for an animal, but with different connotations.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Posts: 261
Own Kudos [?]: 170 [1]
Given Kudos: 342
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Send PM
Re: The deer, despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canad [#permalink]
1
Kudos
GMATNinja wrote:
Quote:
(A) despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness and being free to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, has struggled

I’m not crazy about the “despite having traveled… and being free…”, but I’m not 100% sure that it’s wrong. I guess the sequencing makes sense, but it sounds awkward. Then again – “awkwardness” is a lame reason to eliminate an answer choice, especially on the first pass through. (See our beginners’ guide to SC for more on why “awkwardness” shouldn’t be your primary concern.)

But the verb tenses are a legit problem. “The deer… has struggled to acclimate to the habitat that wildlife biologists had predicted would enable them to thrive.” That doesn’t quite work: why would we pair the past perfect (“had predicted”) with an action in present perfect (“has struggled”)? I’d be OK if “has struggled” just said “struggled”, but this version doesn’t work.

More importantly: “the deer” is plural. More on that in a moment. Either way, (A) is out.


Quote:
(B) in spite of having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness where it would be free to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, struggled

Sneaky! “Deer” could be either singular or plural, so you have to let the question somehow “tell you” how to handle it. (Here’s an official example of this concept.) In this case, the word “them” is not underlined, so we know that “deer” has to be plural. So the “it” in (B) is wrong.

Quote:
(C) despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness that offered freedom to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, had struggled

I'm OK with basically everything here, except for the verb tenses: there’s no good reason to use the past perfect “had struggled” here, since we have no “time marker” (usually, another action in simple past tense) that occurred later. (C) is gone.

Quote:
(D) after traveling hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness that offered freedom to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, struggles

I feel kinda bad for the poor deer, because they’re still struggling in the present. But I can’t figure out why we would use present tense here, considering that we have another action in past perfect (“had predicted”). I think we need simple past tense in this case. (D) is gone.

Quote:
(E) which traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness where they would be free to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, struggled

The “which” looks fine, “they” agrees with “them” later in the sentence, and the verb tense is finally correct. (E) is the winner.



Although E is correct in grammar but if you remove WHICH modifier, the meaning is lost.
I think DESPITE mentions the paradox clearly.

What do you think?
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63666 [2]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: The deer, despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canad [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
abrakadabra21 wrote:
Although E is correct in grammar but if you remove WHICH modifier, the meaning is lost.
I think DESPITE mentions the paradox clearly.

What do you think?

Hm, interesting question! I don't think that it would be wrong to use "despite" here, but I don't think that it's ideal, either. The intended meaning is that the deer struggled despite the biologists' prediction, and despite the lack of "highway traffic or other man-made dangers." But in (A) and (C), "despite" is immediately followed with "having traveled hundreds of miles..." -- and the deer's travels are irrelevant to the deer's struggles to acclimate. So there's no real reason to use "despite", since there's no apparent paradox between the deer's travels and its struggles to acclimate. But I wouldn't automatically eliminate (A) or (C) because of the use of "despite" -- I think it's probably acceptable, but not strictly necessary.

More importantly, there are other problems with (A) and (C), as described above. I don't think that the "which" modifier is perfect either, but it's not clearly wrong -- and the other problems in the other answer choices are far more important.

I hope this helps!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Dec 2019
Posts: 22
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [1]
Given Kudos: 179
Location: India
Schools: ISB '23 (WL)
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V33
GMAT 2: 660 Q45 V36
GMAT 3: 730 Q48 V42
GPA: 3.87
Send PM
Re: The deer, despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canad [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Can someone explain the usages and differences between 'despite of' and 'inspite of'?
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7775 [2]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: The deer, despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canad [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
Arjun02 "Despite" and "in spite of" are essentially the same, and either can be used. However, "despite of" is never used.
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 30 Dec 2019
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The deer, despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canad [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Is having traveled (from option B) correct ? I Know the answer due to sv agreement. I want to understand if having traveled is correct or not. Thanks in advance
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Dec 2019
Posts: 22
Own Kudos [?]: 12 [0]
Given Kudos: 179
Location: India
Schools: ISB '23 (WL)
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V33
GMAT 2: 660 Q45 V36
GMAT 3: 730 Q48 V42
GPA: 3.87
Send PM
Re: The deer, despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canad [#permalink]
DmitryFarber So suppose if option B didn't have 'it' and instead have 'they', would it be a more appropriate answer than E?

I am asking this question because I chose answer B as I didn't notice the error between 'it' and 'they'. Also I didn't find any other error in option B.
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 2642
Own Kudos [?]: 7775 [4]
Given Kudos: 55
GMAT 2: 780  Q50  V50
Send PM
Re: The deer, despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canad [#permalink]
3
Kudos
Expert Reply
Arjun02 That's a dangerous game to play. The right answers are right, not just better than the others, so there's no real reason to prefer some other variation to E. As for B, the only other difference is at the beginning. So do we want "in spite of having traveled"? Definitely not. The deer didn't struggle to acclimate to a new climate in spite of having traveled. On the contrary, they struggled to acclimate because they had traveled to a new climate. The contrast we need to see is between the prediction by biologists and the actual result.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Posts: 440
Own Kudos [?]: 84 [0]
Given Kudos: 147
Send PM
Re: The deer, despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canad [#permalink]
dear MikeScarn, GMATNinja, Abhi077, GMATNinjaTwo, hazelnut, @generis,@DmitryFarber
is it solid to cross off C because of "that" after Canada wildness, rather than "where"
Quote:
(C) despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness that offered freedom to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, had struggled


thanks in advance.
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63666 [0]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: The deer, despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canad [#permalink]
Expert Reply
anizore1995 wrote:
Is having traveled (from option B) correct ? I Know the answer due to sv agreement. I want to understand if having traveled is correct or not. Thanks in advance

There is nothing inherently wrong with the form "having traveled". For example, you could certainly say,

    "Having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the lake, the deer were tired." - This tells us that one action (the traveling) occurred before another action (being tired).

But in choice (B), "having traveled" comes after "in spite of". We expect a noun to follow "in spite of," as prepositions, by definition, introduce nouns. For example,

    "In spite of the cold, Jonas went for a run."

We could certainly use an -ing form that acts as a noun (a gerund, if you like the jargon) after "in spite of". For example,

    "In spite of the waiting, I enjoyed my trip to the Department of Motor Vehicles to renew my license." - (This sentence has never actually been spoken in the history of driver's licenses.)

But "having traveled" is not a noun form and thus doesn't work after "in spite of".

zoezhuyan wrote:
dear MikeScarn, GMATNinja, Abhi077, GMATNinjaTwo, hazelnut, @generis,@DmitryFarber
is it solid to cross off C because of "that" after Canada wildness, rather than "where"
Quote:
(C) despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness that offered freedom to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, had struggled


thanks in advance.

I wouldn't eliminate (C) for that reason alone. There's nothing inherently wrong with using "that" to modify "wilderness". For example,

    "The plane crash survivor was lost in the wilderness that lies to the east of Canada's Yukon Territory."

The verb tense issue described in this post is a better reason to eliminate (C).

I hope that helps!
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Sep 2019
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [0]
Given Kudos: 22
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V33
Send PM
Re: The deer, despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canad [#permalink]
GMATNinja wrote:
Quote:
(A) despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness and being free to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, has struggled

I’m not crazy about the “despite having traveled… and being free…”, but I’m not 100% sure that it’s wrong. I guess the sequencing makes sense, but it sounds awkward. Then again – “awkwardness” is a lame reason to eliminate an answer choice, especially on the first pass through. (See our beginners’ guide to SC for more on why “awkwardness” shouldn’t be your primary concern.)

But the verb tenses are a legit problem. “The deer… has struggled to acclimate to the habitat that wildlife biologists had predicted would enable them to thrive.” That doesn’t quite work: why would we pair the past perfect (“had predicted”) with an action in present perfect (“has struggled”)? I’d be OK if “has struggled” just said “struggled”, but this version doesn’t work.

More importantly: “the deer” is plural. More on that in a moment. Either way, (A) is out.


Quote:
(B) in spite of having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness where it would be free to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, struggled

Sneaky! “Deer” could be either singular or plural, so you have to let the question somehow “tell you” how to handle it. (Here’s an official example of this concept.) In this case, the word “them” is not underlined, so we know that “deer” has to be plural. So the “it” in (B) is wrong.

Quote:
(C) despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness that offered freedom to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, had struggled

I'm OK with basically everything here, except for the verb tenses: there’s no good reason to use the past perfect “had struggled” here, since we have no “time marker” (usually, another action in simple past tense) that occurred later. (C) is gone.

Quote:
(D) after traveling hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness that offered freedom to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, struggles

I feel kinda bad for the poor deer, because they’re still struggling in the present. But I can’t figure out why we would use present tense here, considering that we have another action in past perfect (“had predicted”). I think we need simple past tense in this case. (D) is gone.

Quote:
(E) which traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness where they would be free to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, struggled

The “which” looks fine, “they” agrees with “them” later in the sentence, and the verb tense is finally correct. (E) is the winner.


Hi Ninja

Doesnt which in E makes it non essential modifier. Since the "Comma" was before the underlined portion
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Posts: 6921
Own Kudos [?]: 63666 [0]
Given Kudos: 1774
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170

GRE 2: Q170 V170
Send PM
Re: The deer, despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canad [#permalink]
Expert Reply
Nityanshu1990 wrote:
GMATNinja wrote:
Quote:
(E) which traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness where they would be free to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, struggled

The “which” looks fine, “they” agrees with “them” later in the sentence, and the verb tense is finally correct. (E) is the winner.


Hi Ninja

Doesnt which in E makes it non essential modifier. Since the "Comma" was before the underlined portion

Check out this post for my not-so-satisfying thoughts on essential vs non-essential modifiers. If you have questions after reading that, just let us know.
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Dec 2018
Posts: 249
Own Kudos [?]: 34 [0]
Given Kudos: 70
Send PM
Re: The deer, despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canad [#permalink]
GMATNinja wrote:
Quote:
(A) despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness and being free to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, has struggled

I’m not crazy about the “despite having traveled… and being free…”, but I’m not 100% sure that it’s wrong. I guess the sequencing makes sense, but it sounds awkward. Then again – “awkwardness” is a lame reason to eliminate an answer choice, especially on the first pass through. (See our beginners’ guide to SC for more on why “awkwardness” shouldn’t be your primary concern.)

But the verb tenses are a legit problem. “The deer… has struggled to acclimate to the habitat that wildlife biologists had predicted would enable them to thrive.” That doesn’t quite work: why would we pair the past perfect (“had predicted”) with an action in present perfect (“has struggled”)? I’d be OK if “has struggled” just said “struggled”, but this version doesn’t work.

More importantly: “the deer” is plural. More on that in a moment. Either way, (A) is out.


Quote:
(B) in spite of having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness where it would be free to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, struggled

Sneaky! “Deer” could be either singular or plural, so you have to let the question somehow “tell you” how to handle it. (Here’s an official example of this concept.) In this case, the word “them” is not underlined, so we know that “deer” has to be plural. So the “it” in (B) is wrong.

Quote:
(C) despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness that offered freedom to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, had struggled

I'm OK with basically everything here, except for the verb tenses: there’s no good reason to use the past perfect “had struggled” here, since we have no “time marker” (usually, another action in simple past tense) that occurred later. (C) is gone.

Quote:
(D) after traveling hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness that offered freedom to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, struggles

I feel kinda bad for the poor deer, because they’re still struggling in the present. But I can’t figure out why we would use present tense here, considering that we have another action in past perfect (“had predicted”). I think we need simple past tense in this case. (D) is gone.

Quote:
(E) which traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canadian wilderness where they would be free to roam without fear of highway traffic or other man-made dangers, struggled

The “which” looks fine, “they” agrees with “them” later in the sentence, and the verb tense is finally correct. (E) is the winner.


Hi GMATNinja AndrewN

Do we uses despite with a clause?
My understanding was the despite/in spite of only follows and phrase
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Posts: 3512
Own Kudos [?]: 6859 [0]
Given Kudos: 500
Re: The deer, despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canad [#permalink]
Expert Reply
shanks2020 wrote:
Hi GMATNinja AndrewN

Do we uses despite with a clause?
My understanding was the despite/in spite of only follows and phrase

Hello, shanks2020. You can use despite/in spite of ahead of an embedded clause, but you would not use such a construct ahead of an independent clause. We can take the following sentences, for instance, to illustrate the point:

CORRECT: Despite the fact that the soldier had lost both of his legs during the war, he ended up becoming a Paralympic athlete.

INCORRECT: Despite the soldier had lost both of his legs...

If my sentence were being tested, I doubt the first would win out if there were another version with a phrase—e.g., Despite the soldier losing/having lost both of his legs...—but the clause version is not inherently incorrect.

I hope that helps answer your question. Thank you for thinking to ask.

- Andrew
Manager
Manager
Joined: 02 Dec 2018
Posts: 249
Own Kudos [?]: 34 [0]
Given Kudos: 70
Send PM
Re: The deer, despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canad [#permalink]
AndrewN wrote:
shanks2020 wrote:
Hi GMATNinja AndrewN

Do we uses despite with a clause?
My understanding was the despite/in spite of only follows and phrase

Hello, shanks2020. You can use despite/in spite of ahead of an embedded clause, but you would not use such a construct ahead of an independent clause. We can take the following sentences, for instance, to illustrate the point:

CORRECT: Despite the fact that the soldier had lost both of his legs during the war, he ended up becoming a Paralympic athlete.

INCORRECT: Despite the soldier had lost both of his legs...

If my sentence were being tested, I doubt the first would win out if there were another version with a phrase—e.g., Despite the soldier losing/having lost both of his legs...—but the clause version is not inherently incorrect.

I hope that helps answer your question. Thank you for thinking to ask.

- Andrew


Thanks AndrewN for the reply.

What would you mean by embedded clause in your explanation?
In the sentence - Despite "having lost both ..." does the part after HAVING form a clause?
My understanding is yes, but still not sure because there is no subject. A clause should have both subject and verb.
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Posts: 3512
Own Kudos [?]: 6859 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Re: The deer, despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canad [#permalink]
1
Bookmarks
Expert Reply
shanks2020 wrote:
Thanks AndrewN for the reply.

What would you mean by embedded clause in your explanation?
In the sentence - Despite "having lost both ..." does the part after HAVING form a clause?
My understanding is yes, but still not sure because there is no subject. A clause should have both subject and verb.

I was referring to the that clause in my sentence as the embedded clause, one that would not be used on its own to form a sentence. You are correct in saying that an independent clause should contain both a subject and a verb. For this reason, we could not call my having lost both... example a clause. It would be a phrase instead, one that would modify the eventual subject of the main clause (something like he). It can be a bit confusing at times to determine whether a that clause is actually being used as the subject of a sentence, or whether an -ing phrase is actually a gerund, but with more exposure to such sentences, and with an eye on the verb that must be present to allow this type of subject to operate in a sentence, the challenge becomes less daunting. Consider the following sentences, in which I will mark each subject and predicate of the main clause (the predicate will start with the verb):

1) That the criminal convicted of embezzlement was greedy is a bygone conclusion. (Akin to saying, [Something] is a bygone conclusion.)

2) Being a teenager is difficult. (Akin to saying, [Something] is difficult.)

One way to improve at SC is to become adept at identifying subjects and verbs. As simple as it seems, the GMAT™ can throw some really pretzel-ly sentences your way at times. But focusing on the basics can still help you solve even some of the hardest questions.

I hope I have not muddled the picture. (Fingers crossed.)

- Andrew
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The deer, despite having traveled hundreds of miles to reach the Canad [#permalink]
 1   2   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne