It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 10:33

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Prediction, the hallmark of natural sciences, appears to

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Posts: 250

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 9

Location: Kolkata
Schools: La Martiniere for Boys
Prediction, the hallmark of natural sciences, appears to [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2008, 07:16
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

75% (00:28) correct 25% (01:57) wrong based on 19 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Prediction, the hallmark of natural sciences, appears
to have been possible by reducing phenomena to
mathematical expressions. Some social scientists also
want the power to predict accurately and assume they
ought to perform the same reduction. But this would
be a mistake; it would neglect data that are not easily
mathematized and thereby would only distort the
social phenomena.

Which one of the following most accurately
expresses the main conclusion of the argument?
(A) The social sciences do not have as much
predictive power as the natural sciences.
(B) Mathematics plays a more important role in the
natural sciences than it does in the social
sciences.
(C) There is a need in the social sciences to
improve the ability to predict.
(D) Phenomena in the social sciences should not be
reduced to mathematical formulas.
(E) Prediction is responsible for the success of the
natural sciences.

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 9

Director
Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 653

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2008, 07:28
rampuria wrote:
Prediction, the hallmark of natural sciences, appears
to have been possible by reducing phenomena to
mathematical expressions. Some social scientists also
want the power to predict accurately and assume they
ought to perform the same reduction. But this would
be a mistake; it would neglect data that are not easily
mathematized and thereby would only distort the
social phenomena.

P: Prediction can be done by reducing phenomena to mathematical expressions
P: Some social scientists want to predict accurately and assume they can perform the same reduction of Phenomenon to math expression.
CP: But this is a mistake; such math reduction would neglect data that are not easily mathematized and will distort the social phenomena.

C: Some Social SC may not be able to reduce Social phonomena correctly to math exp. And hence may not be able to predict accurately.

Which one of the following most accurately
expresses the main conclusion of the argument?
(A) The social sciences do not have as much
predictive power as the natural sciences.
(B) Mathematics plays a more important role in the
natural sciences than it does in the social
sciences.
(C) There is a need in the social sciences to
improve the ability to predict.
(D) Phenomena in the social sciences should not be
reduced to mathematical formulas.
(E) Prediction is responsible for the success of the
natural sciences.

IMO D

Kudos [?]: 135 [0], given: 7

Manager
Joined: 12 Jun 2008
Posts: 76

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2008, 08:45
Between B & D, i will go to B.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 27 Aug 2008
Posts: 145

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2008, 08:51
IMO D

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 18 May 2008
Posts: 1259

Kudos [?]: 526 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2008, 09:14
D

Kudos [?]: 526 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 801

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2008, 09:33
D makes the most sense

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Posts: 250

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 9

Location: Kolkata
Schools: La Martiniere for Boys

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2008, 09:40
Can anybody explain why B is not the correct the answer.

The OA answer is D but I don't understand [i]why [i] it is so
_________________

Thanks
rampuria

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 9

Director
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 801

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2008, 09:43
its not B because the stimulus doesnt support the idea that math is more important in natural sciences. Math could possibly be just as important in social sciences but in a different capacity

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 29 Sep 2008
Posts: 4

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2008, 09:56
Clearly D

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Posts: 250

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 9

Location: Kolkata
Schools: La Martiniere for Boys

### Show Tags

02 Oct 2008, 10:00
bigtreezl wrote:
its not B because the stimulus doesnt support the idea that math is more important in natural sciences. Math could possibly be just as important in social sciences but in a different capacity

I made a mistake. Actually I wish to know why the answer is not A. Clearly, from the argument one CAN conclude that social sciences do not have as much predictive powers as natural sciences
_________________

Thanks
rampuria

Kudos [?]: 99 [0], given: 9

Re: CR Help Required   [#permalink] 02 Oct 2008, 10:00
Display posts from previous: Sort by