It is currently 19 Nov 2017, 07:37

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# President Clinton spent significant money on the No Child

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2352

Kudos [?]: 9277 [7], given: 340

President Clinton spent significant money on the No Child [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2013, 20:18
7
KUDOS
Expert's post
25
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

60% (00:49) correct 40% (00:59) wrong based on 2015 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

President Clinton spent significant money on the “No Child Left Behind” program in several school districts throughout the country, which led to a boom in the school construction industry and also added thousands of jobs for teachers and support staff.

A. which led to a boom in the school construction industry and also added
B. which not only led to a boom in the school construction industry, but also added
C. not only leading to a boom in the school construction industry but also adding
D. leading to a boom in the school construction industry, which also added
E. leading to a boom in the construction industry of school, which added

Regards,

Payal
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Last edited by egmat on 05 Feb 2013, 16:46, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 9277 [7], given: 340

Intern
Joined: 15 Aug 2012
Posts: 47

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 2

Re: President Clinton spent significant money on the No Child [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2013, 21:32
Meaning :- President Clinton spent significant money on a program. the program did 2 things
a. led to a boom in school contr. ind

Error Analysis :- which correctly modifies the program, but the 'and also..' can mean that President Clinton spent and President Clinton Added. Need a second which to correctly modify the program - parallelism error.

Option A :- Explained
Option B :- Uses correct idiom, not only - but also to modify program - Correct Answer
Option C :- the verb-ing modifier leading and adding now describe the effects of the preceding clause and does not modify program
Option D :- The school construction industry did not add jobs for teachers, the program did. Also similar verb-ing modifier error and in C
Option E :- Similar verb-ing modifier error as in C and also 'the construction industry of school' is wordy than 'the school construction industry'.

IMO :- B

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 2

Senior Manager
Joined: 24 Aug 2009
Posts: 497

Kudos [?]: 867 [13], given: 276

Schools: Harvard, Columbia, Stern, Booth, LSB,
Re: President Clinton spent significant money on the No Child [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2013, 23:36
13
KUDOS
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
President Clinton spent significant money on the “No Child Left Behind” program in several school districts throughout the country, which led to a boom in the school construction industry and also added thousands of jobs for teachers and support staff.
A. which led to a boom in the school construction industry and also added-
In this option WHICH refers to Country but the original intent is to focus on the results of program. Thus INCORRECT. Moreover use of AND changes the meaning

B. which not only led to a boom in the school construction industry, but also added -
In this option WHICH refers to Country but the original intent is to focus on the results of program. Thus INCORRECT

C. not only leading to a boom in the school construction industry but also adding -
Use of Participle correctly explains the results of the program. Moreover, Not only X But also lists two results succinctly. Thus CORRECT

D. leading to a boom in the school construction industry, which also added -
In this option WHICH refers to industry.This is grammatically correct but it changes the original intent. Thus INCORRECT

E. leading to a boom in the construction industry of school, which added-
In this option WHICH refers to industry.This is grammatically correct but it changes the original intent. Moreover "Construction industry of School" is awkward & lengthy. Thus INCORRECT

Hope it helps.

Fame
_________________

If you like my Question/Explanation or the contribution, Kindly appreciate by pressing KUDOS.
Kudos always maximizes GMATCLUB worth
-Game Theory

If you have any question regarding my post, kindly pm me or else I won't be able to reply

Kudos [?]: 867 [13], given: 276

Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 96

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 62

Location: India
GMAT Date: 10-25-2012
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: President Clinton spent significant money on the No Child [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2013, 01:05
President Clinton spent significant money on the “No Child Left Behind” program in several school districts throughout the country, which led to a boom in the school construction industry and also added thousands of jobs for teachers and support staff.

Meaning: President's action resulted in a boom in school construction industry and also added thousands of jobs
This sentence represents a cause-effect relationship between the two clause. such a relation can be correctly represented by starting the second clause with -ing modifier (leading).

A. which led to a boom in the school construction industry and also added presidents action resulted in a boom in school construction industry , but here "which" refers to country
B. which not only led to a boom in the school construction industry, but also added presidents action resulted in a boom in school construction industry , but here "which" refers to country
C. not only leading to a boom in the school construction industry but also adding correct
D. leading to a boom in the school construction industry, which also added meaning issue. the original sentence means that presidents action resulted in a boom in school construction industry and also added thousands of jobs. But here the sentence says that boom in the construction industry added new jobs
E. leading to a boom in the construction industry of school, which added which incorrectly refers to construction industry,
_________________

if my post helped you, let me know by pressing Kudos...

Kudos [?]: 120 [0], given: 62

Intern
Joined: 19 May 2012
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 16

Re: President Clinton spent significant money on the No Child [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2013, 06:24
[quote="egmat"]President Clinton spent significant money on the “No Child Left Behind” program in several school districts throughout the country, which led to a boom in the school construction industry and also added thousands of jobs for teachers and support staff.

A. which led to a boom in the school construction industry and also added - Which modifying country .
B. which not only led to a boom in the school construction industry, but also added - Same as A
C. not only leading to a boom in the school construction industry but also adding - Idiom ( Not only ... But also ) used correctly. Two participle phases are parallel.
D. leading to a boom in the school construction industry, which also added - Changed the meaning
E. leading to a boom in the construction industry of school, which added - Changed the meaning

Last edited by sangamsrk on 04 Feb 2013, 06:32, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 16

Intern
Joined: 15 Aug 2012
Posts: 47

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 2

Re: President Clinton spent significant money on the No Child [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2013, 06:27

For verb-ing modifier to explain the results of the preceding clause, the ver-ing modifier should modify both the subject and the verb of the preceding clause also the subject should make sense with the verb-ing.

the subject verb pair of the preceding clause is President Clinton - Spent, so grammatically option C is saying is that president Clinton spent money and this act resulted in boom in construction industry and also in adding the jobs. grammatically option C also states that President Clinton did the action of leading a boom in the school construction industry and president Clinton did the action of adding thousands of jobs. which is not correct.
the institution of program led to those activities.

Also if a modifier between a modified entity and relative pronoun cannot be placed anywhere else in the sentence then the relative pronoun will modify the head of the noun phrase. In the above sentence the prep phrase 'in several districts throughout the country' modifies program cannot be placed anywhere else in the sentence. hence the relative pronoun will modify the entire noun phrase "the 'No.....country'" and correctly modifies the head of the noun phrase.

I might be moving in a tangential direction but just trying to get my concepts cleared in the process

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 26 Feb 2012
Posts: 107

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 56

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Re: President Clinton spent significant money on the No Child [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2013, 07:17
Stuck up between C and E but finally chose "E" why????????

A. which led to a boom in the school construction industry and also added--wrong modifier
B. which not only led to a boom in the school construction industry, but also added---wrong modifier
C. not only leading to a boom in the school construction industry but also adding--correct idiom but tense unveil something else
D. leading to a boom in the school construction industry, which also added--wrong modifier
E. leading to a boom in the construction industry of school, which added....Money already been spent..so the result have to be simple past that's why "which added" is correct

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 56

Intern
Joined: 01 Dec 2012
Posts: 36

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 8

Concentration: Finance, Operations
GPA: 2.9
Re: President Clinton spent significant money on the No Child [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2013, 08:12
IMO:E
President Clinton spent significant money on the “No Child Left Behind” program in several school districts throughout the country, which ( antecedent is not clear , it may country/program , however by meaning it seems that spending money on the "no child left behind" program ---> led to boom....so cause n effect relnship => leading in stead of using which would be btr construction) led to a boom in the school construction industry and also added ( not clear who added thds of jobs ) thousands of jobs for teachers and support staff.

A. which led to a boom in the school construction industry and also added :incorrect (explained in main clause)
B. which not only led to a boom in the school construction industry, but also added
C. not only leading to a boom in the school construction industry but also adding (leading and adding should not talking abt the same theme and topic , so these two should nt b parallel) :incorrect
D. leading to a boom in the school construction industry, which also added (school construction industry cant add teachers to them , rather school can thds of jobs ) :incorrect
E. leading to a boom in the construction industry of school, which added :correct (correctly show the cause-effect relnship ...and added thds of jobs correctly modify the school)

OA and Official explanation will be posted later. Looking forward to your detailed explanations!

Regards,

Payal

Kudos [?]: 55 [0], given: 8

e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2352

Kudos [?]: 9277 [1], given: 340

Re: President Clinton spent significant money on the No Child [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Feb 2013, 23:13
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
Some great explanations here. Lets get a few more folks to respond before we disclose the OA and the explanation. Don't forget to use the poll.
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Kudos [?]: 9277 [1], given: 340

e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2352

Kudos [?]: 9277 [11], given: 340

Re: President Clinton spent significant money on the No Child [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Feb 2013, 16:45
11
KUDOS
Expert's post
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Thanks everyone for their overwhelming participation in this question. Here is the much awaited solution!

President Clinton spent significant money on the “No Child Left Behind” program in several school districts throughout the country, which led to a boom in the school construction industry and also added thousands of jobs for teachers and support staff.

• President Clinton spent significant money on the “No Child Left Behind” program in several school districts throughout the country,
which led to a boom in the school construction industry and also added thousands of jobs for teachers and support staff.

President Clinton spent money on a particular program in several schools. This spending has resulted in two things:
o Boom in the school construction industry
o Addition of jobs for teachers and support staff.

Error Analysis

• President Clinton spent significant money on the “No Child Left Behind” program in several school districts throughout the country,
which led to a boom in the school construction industry and also added thousands of jobs for teachers and support staff.

Error 1 – Per the meaning of the sentence, the action of spending resulted into two things. Here relative pronoun “which” has been used to mention the results of the action in the preceding clause. This is incorrect because “which” can only refer to a noun entity and not a clause.

PoE

A. which led to a boom in the school construction industry and also added: Incorrect for the reasons stated above.

B. which not only led to a boom in the school construction industry, but also added: Incorrect. Repeats the same error as in choice A.

C. not only leading to a boom in the school construction industry but also adding: Correct Answer

D. leading to a boom in the school construction industry, which also added: Incorrect.

Error 1 – Use of “which” is incorrect because it illogically modifies the preceding noun entity “the school construction industry”. Per this choice, the sentence means that the school construction industry added jobs for teachers and support staff.E. more on simplistic design and is more functional than are: Incorrect.

E. leading to a boom in the construction industry of school, which added: Incorrect. Repeats the same error as in choice AD

1. Relative pronouns CANNOT refer to the preceding clause. They can only refer to the preceding noun entity. So when the function of the modifier is to modify preceding clause, then relative pronoun modifiers cannot be used.
2. Comma + Verb-ing modifier presents the result of the preceding clause.

Thanks.
Payal
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Kudos [?]: 9277 [11], given: 340

Retired Moderator
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Posts: 1184

Kudos [?]: 1958 [1], given: 152

Re: President Clinton spent significant money on the No Child [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Feb 2013, 19:42
1
KUDOS
Great question e-GMAT...Really a 700+ one.

And Kudos for your awesome explanations.

Unfortunately I got it wrong... Can you please come up with more of this type of questions after few days so that those who got it wrong like me, will get a chance to verify the lesson learnt here.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1958 [1], given: 152

e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2352

Kudos [?]: 9277 [0], given: 340

Re: President Clinton spent significant money on the No Child [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Feb 2013, 20:39
bagdbmba wrote:
Great question e-GMAT...Really a 700+ one.

And Kudos for your awesome explanations.

Unfortunately I got it wrong... Can you please come up with more of this type of questions after few days so that those who got it wrong like me, will get a chance to verify the lesson learnt here.

Sure bagdbmba...But why did you go wrong here? And what is the lesson learned here?
And have I thanked you before for consolidating all e-GMAT posts in one place...If not, then here I am thanking you
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Kudos [?]: 9277 [0], given: 340

Intern
Joined: 15 Aug 2012
Posts: 47

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 2

Re: President Clinton spent significant money on the No Child [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Feb 2013, 21:29
All I can say is practice, practice and practice

Good question Payal.

I have 1 question in the above sentence, ignoring the other errors, what can the pronoun 'which' refer to, can it refer to the Country or the program ?

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 2

Board of Directors
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3372

Kudos [?]: 9283 [0], given: 1168

Re: President Clinton spent significant money on the No Child [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2013, 05:04
I love this sentence for the reason that a lot of students do not think flexible. (sorry this is not a charge)

In this exam, in each question you MUST use all your tools in your arsenal (btw, love this word because reminds me of megadeth )

When meaning is not sufficient to takle a question spot what is the problem using grammar point of view, and viceversa. Both if necessary when you scan the question and try to anticipate always the answer. For instance: reading the question the key word is $$program$$

A) which after comma modifies country - out, immediately

B) the same - out

C) mmmmm leading and adding - seems fine. mmmmm not only...but also.....mmmmmmmmm seems fine. keep (15 seconds to think about)

D) leading......mmmmm seems good, keep going........which after comma modifies industry and this change all things........out - immediately

E) same process untill I encouter which......mmmmmmm now modifies school before industry, in concrete are you kidding me ?? - stay away

C and move one. no more of 50/60 seconds to do this mental process.

I admit that is not always simple (and of course me too picks a question wrong, even two :D or five) but use your logic

Fraud or Phenom In Sentence Correction

I love it

regards
_________________

Kudos [?]: 9283 [0], given: 1168

Retired Moderator
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Posts: 1184

Kudos [?]: 1958 [0], given: 152

Re: President Clinton spent significant money on the No Child [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2013, 06:36
egmat wrote:
bagdbmba wrote:
Great question e-GMAT...Really a 700+ one.

And Kudos for your awesome explanations.

Unfortunately I got it wrong... Can you please come up with more of this type of questions after few days so that those who got it wrong like me, will get a chance to verify the lesson learnt here.

Sure bagdbmba...But why did you go wrong here? And what is the lesson learned here?
And have I thanked you before for consolidating all e-GMAT posts in one place...If not, then here I am thanking you

Hey e-GMAT,
Actually I got the meaning wrong...so NO EXCUSE !
I thought it's the program that is responsible for two good things as mentioned...later realized that it's the fact that the President spent that much of money and this has basically caused the program to yield two good results.

Very important lesson learnt here-'which' can't be used to modify or identify clauses. It can do so only to Nouns...

However, had the sentence been some different and the yield is directly caused by the Program itself, then I think 'which' would have been fine in the following use: "...the Program in several schools in the country, which is responsible for bla bla..., is an innovative one.!" Please let me know if I'm right?

And BTW, thanks for the appreciation...I guess the 'Kudo' to my last post is due to the consolidated SC article...not for the wrong answer surely
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1958 [0], given: 152

Retired Moderator
Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Posts: 1184

Kudos [?]: 1958 [1], given: 152

Re: President Clinton spent significant money on the No Child [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2013, 09:58
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Folks,
Added this to my post : e-GMAT's ALL SC topics-Consolidated

Refer to my sig.

@ Payal/Shradhha/Rajat-guys, can you please have a look at the consolidated post in my sig. on ALL of your SC topics and questions.Has updated the same with your recent SC 700+ questions.

Please let me know whether I've missed any.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 1958 [1], given: 152

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10132

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Re: President Clinton spent significant money on the No Child [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Apr 2014, 04:18
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 270 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 131

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 368

Re: President Clinton spent significant money on the No Child [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 May 2014, 13:19
Just wanted to get my confusion cleared on this one :
Doing this question the second time and again got it wrong.But this time I used a different logic and wanted to clarify that to make sure I never get this wrong again.
I understand ing modifier here is describing the result of action of the previous clause.But how does this -ing modifier applies to the subject "The president" of the previous clause.
Any explanation would be much appreciated.
_________________

Feel Free to Press Kudos if you like the way I think .

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 368

e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2352

Kudos [?]: 9277 [2], given: 340

Re: President Clinton spent significant money on the No Child [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 May 2014, 14:07
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
282552 wrote:
Just wanted to get my confusion cleared on this one :
Doing this question the second time and again got it wrong.But this time I used a different logic and wanted to clarify that to make sure I never get this wrong again.
I understand ing modifier here is describing the result of action of the previous clause.But how does this -ing modifier applies to the subject "The president" of the previous clause.
Any explanation would be much appreciated.

Hi 282552,
Thank you for the post.

It's great that you have correctly identified that the verb-ing modifiers ‘leading’ and ‘adding’ modify the preceding clause. Also, as you pointed out, these modifiers are describing the results of the action of the preceding clause. The only thing in which you faced a problem was how to check whether the modifier makes sense with the subject or not. Let’s do the sentence structure for the given sentence:

OFFICIAL QUESTION

President Clinton spent significant money on the “No Child Left Behind” program in several school districts throughout the country,
o not only leading to a boom in the school construction industry
o but also adding thousands of jobs for teachers and support staff.

EXPLANATION

As you correctly identified, the verb-ing modifiers in this sentence present the result of the action ‘spending the money’. Let’s try to associate them with the subject ‘President Clinton’.

Now let's think a bit: Can President Clinton be the doer of the two actions: leading and adding?

We can say that President Clinton led to a boom in the school construction industry and added thousands of jobs by spending significant money on the “No Child Left Behind” program. So, the subject makes perfect sense with the modifiers.

Hope the above discussion helps!
Regards,

Deepak.
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Kudos [?]: 9277 [2], given: 340

Intern
Joined: 21 Jan 2015
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: President Clinton spent significant money on the No Child [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 May 2015, 20:57
Hi! I have some doubts on the Comma + Verb-ing modifier. It modifies the preceding clause and presents the result in this example. Also comma+ verb-ing modifier should associate with the subject of the preceding clause. President Clinton is the subject and I don't think the modifier makes sense with the subject.
Look forward to any replies and explanations. Thanks!

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: President Clinton spent significant money on the No Child   [#permalink] 09 May 2015, 20:57

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 27 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by