GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 16 Sep 2019, 09:29

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis a

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Senior SC Moderator
avatar
V
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 3404
President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2019, 20:24
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

73% (01:33) correct 27% (01:31) wrong based on 347 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Project SC Butler: Day 139: Sentence Correction (SC2)


For SC butler Questions Click Here


President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis and the Federal Aviation Administration in July 1981 to discuss a possible air traffic controllers’ strike and how they would have to act legally and politically to handle them.

A) how they would have to act legally and politically to handle them

B) how to handle them if legal and political action would be required

C) what would be necessary legally and politically for handling such an event

D) what legal and political action would be necessary in order to handle such an event

E) the necessity of what kind of legal and political action in order to handle it

_________________
SC Butler has resumed! Get two SC questions to practice, whose links you can find by date, here.

There are only two ways to live your life: as though nothing is a miracle, or as though everything is a miracle. -- Einstein
Senior SC Moderator
avatar
V
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 3404
President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2019, 20:25
4
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

Project SC Butler: Day 139: Sentence Correction (SC2)



President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis and the Federal Aviation Administration in July 1981 to discuss a possible air traffic controllers’ strike and how they would have to act legally and politically to handle them.

A) how they would have to act legally and politically to handle them

B) how to handle them if legal and political action would be required

C) what would be necessary legally and politically for handling such an event

D) what legal and political action would be necessary in order to handle such an event

E) the necessity of what kind of legal and political action in order to handle it[/quote]

HIGHLIGHTS

• COMPARE. This question has only one answer that can be dismissed quickly: B.
Options A, C, and E are harder to eliminate than B is. Comparing those three to D is a good strategy.

• Pronouns: Possessive poison? It's a guideline, not a rule.
Careful. Do not use possessive poison as an automatic elimination strategy.

On the GMAT, as long as meaning is clear, both object and subject pronouns may have a possessive noun as an antecedent.
That sentence opens a post I wrote that took hours to research. The post discusses GMAC's apparent and current position. The post takes two minutes to read.
You can find that post HERE.

Possessive poison has been decisive in how many official questions? Zero.

At least six officially correct answers "violate" this rule, four of which I discuss in the linked post.
Possessive poison is not an ironclad rule. It's a guideline.

If you see a possessive antecedent for a non-possessive pronoun, do not automatically reject the option.
Flag the option. If it has no other glaring errors, keep the option until the end.

• PARALLELISM: to discuss X and Y
-- discuss is a transitive verb that requires objects (discuss what?)
-- X = a possible air traffic controllers’ strike
-- Y = the other thing in the answer choices
-- X is a noun phrase. Y needs to be a noun or noun phrase.

• noun clauses (also called nominal clauses or substantive clauses)
Be careful.
-- WHAT- and HOW- clauses (and other relative pronoun or relative adverb clauses) can function as nouns and do all the things that nouns do.
-- The italicized words below are nominal clauses (nouns)
Whether he had brown eyes or blue eyes did not matter to the casting agent.
(The nominal clause is the subject of the sentence)
What a person does on a consistent basis reveals more about character than what a person says.
(Nominal clause = both the subject and an object)
-- see the boldface type below Option D. Options A, B, C, and D are all noun clauses (constructed with varying degrees of success)
-- To read about these kinds of clauses, see Mike McGarry, HERE

THE PROMPT

Quote:
President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis and the Federal Aviation Administration in July 1981 to discuss a possible air traffic controllers’ strike and how they would have to act legally and politically to handle them.


THE OPTIONS

Quote:
(A) how they would have to act legally and politically to handle them

• GMAC does not like the same pronoun to refer to different antecedents; as far as I recall, only one official question allows they and them to refer to different antecedents
-- they refers to Reagan, Lewis, and FAA officials
-- them refers to air traffic controllers
-- them is not possessive. air traffic controllers' is possessive. Not great.
• FLAG this option. I suspect that a better option exists

Quote:
(B) how to handle them if legal and political action would be required

• same pronoun issue as that in A: them is not possessive but the antecedent noun is possessive
• In a hypothetical, IF takes were.
-- correct: if legal and political action were required or if legal and political action were to be required
(Legal and political action might or might not be required; the action is only a possibility.)
• eliminate B

Quote:
(C) what would be necessary legally and politically for handling such an event

-- "for handling" is not quite right.
-- "in order to handle" would be better
-- the construction is awkward, but not dead wrong. KEEP, but look for a better option

Quote:
(D) what legal and political action would be necessary in order to handle such an event

-- much better than any other answer so far: clear and correctly modified subject, correct verb, prepositional phrase that acts as an adverbial modifier
-- every word in this answer, taken together, constitutes a nominal clause (or "substantive clause" or "noun clause"). The whole thing functions as a noun even though it contains a verb. The nominal clause is the object of the verb "discuss." See "Highlights" above.
-- Compare A and C to this option.

Quote:
(E) the necessity of what kind of legal and political action in order to handle it

-- the necessity OF what kind of legal and political action?
-- that hella awkward and weird phrase contains two separate issues that have been glued together:
(1) whether any action is needed, on one hand and (2) what kind of action is needed, on the other hand
-- they can discuss
the necessity of legal and political action (whether such action is needed)
and then
what kind of legal and political action,
but the phrasing makes it sound as if the issues were one issue.
• eliminate E

• compare options A and C to D
-- Option A v. option D? No contest. Option D has no pronoun issues. Option D wins
-- Option C v. option D? Also no contest. Option D contains no weird and probably unidiomatic phrases such as "for handling."

The answer is D

COMMENTS

Yes, I know . . . sometimes some of you sneak in after the 24 hour mark, often while I am writing my post (among other things).

sisaqov and amuban - welcome to SC Butler.
exc4libur , good to see you again. :)

Of course I am always happy to see people who post consistently.

As long as a person posts an explanation that is well-reasoned, even if the person bases the answer on a faulty assumption or incorrect rule, that person gets kudos.
Correct answer but no explanation? No kudos.

People who do the best on this test generally and in SC in particular possess strong critical thinking skills.
I know. Sounds boring. Wait till you're staring at a Quant problem from hell or five SC options that all seem correct.
This is the place to make factual mistakes and to sharpen your thinking skills.

Happy kudos! :)
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 13 Feb 2018
Posts: 82
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2019, 21:05
1
President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis and the Federal Aviation Administration in July 1981 to discuss a possible air traffic controllers’ strike and how they would have to act legally and politically to handle them.

Meaning--> The president met with the two departments to discuss X and Y.
X= possible air traffic controller's strike
Y= What possible action they would need to take in order to handle such an event.

Note: The event did not take place till now. They are just speculating what steps they should take if the event occurs.
So basically they are meeting to discuss the plan in advance.
This is what the author wants to convey.
Let's look for a choice which conveys this meaning.
Choice D conveys the intended meaning and also does away with S-V errors present in the original choice.
IMHO D.
Intern
Intern
avatar
S
Joined: 17 Mar 2019
Posts: 22
Re: President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2019, 21:29
1
Tested pronoun ambiguity. If we look at the option A "they" should refer to the president, secretary and administration and the second pronoun "them" has no antecedent so option A out. Similar logic applied to eliminate B. In c handling is not parallel to "to discuss" in the in underlined part hence eliminated. E doesn't make sense. D conveys the right meaning as well as removes the pronoun ambiguity.

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Status: The darker the night, the nearer the dawn!
Joined: 16 Jun 2018
Posts: 177
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Jul 2019, 22:49
1
generis wrote:

Project SC Butler: Day 139: Sentence Correction (SC2)


For SC butler Questions Click Here


President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis and the Federal Aviation Administration in July 1981 to discuss a possible air traffic controllers’ strike and how they would have to act legally and politically to handle them.

Sentence Structure
Subject - Verb:
    President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis and the Federal Aviation Administration in July 1981 to discuss
      1) a possible air traffic controllers’ strike and - Noun phrase
      2) the necessity of what kind of legal and political action in order to handle it( air traffic controllers’ strike ). - Noun phrase

Issues:
    It's a question of pure meaning.
    The sooner one realizes, the faster one can reach the CORRECT answer.
    A, B, C and D Parallelism issue: Noun phrase vs Clause

Answer choice analysis:
    A) how they would have to act legally and politically to handle them
      Parallelism issue: Noun phrase vs Clause
      Pronoun issue: 'them' has NO coherent referrent as air traffic controllers’ is in adjective form

    B) how to handle them if legal and political action would be required
      Parallelism issue: Noun phrase vs Clause
      Pronoun issue: 'them' has NO coherent referrent as air traffic controllers’ is in adjective form

    C) what would be necessary legally and politically for handling such an event
      Parallelism issue: Noun phrase vs Clause

    D) what legal and political action would be necessary in order to handle such an event
      Parallelism issue: Noun phrase vs Clause

    E) the necessity of what kind of legal and political action in order to handle it
      Better than the rest. E is the winner!


_________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“The trouble is, you think you have time.” – Buddha
Giving Kudos is the best way to encourage and appreciate people.
Director
Director
avatar
G
Joined: 22 Nov 2018
Posts: 553
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q45 V35
GMAT 2: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2019, 00:19
1
A) how they would have to act legally and politically to handle them - Strike is singular, Pronoun "them" is incorrect

B) how to handle them if legal and political action would be required Strike is singular, Pronoun "them" is incorrect

C) what would be necessary legally and politically for handling such an event D conveys a better meaning

D) what legal and political action would be necessary in order to handle such an event Correct

E) the necessity of what kind of legal and political action in order to handle it It - "an event" is better. + meaning is not clear as in D
_________________
Give +1 kudos if this answer helps..!!
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 24 Nov 2016
Posts: 426
Location: United States
CAT Tests
Re: President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2019, 04:57
1
generis wrote:
President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis and the Federal Aviation Administration in July 1981 to discuss a possible air traffic controllers’ strike and how they would have to act legally and politically to handle them.

A) how they would have to act legally and politically to handle them
B) how to handle them if legal and political action would be required
C) what would be necessary legally and politically for handling such an event
D) what legal and political action would be necessary in order to handle such an event
E) the necessity of what kind of legal and political action in order to handle it


Meaning: the president MET with x and y TO DISCUSS [1] a possible air strike [singular] and [TO DISCUSS] [2] what action would be necessary.

(A) "them" is plural, the "strike" is singular; also, "they" could imply the "president", but what does he know about the political and legal environment of aviation? unintended;
(B) "them" is plural…; and this suggests that Reagan met with x and y to discuss how to handle x and y, unintended;
(C) "for handling" does show intent, we need "to handle" (infinitive);
(E) "[to discuss] the necessity" Reagan is there to discuss what actions might be taken, no "the necessity", unintended; also, "what action in order to handle it" this is confusing;

Answer (D).
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 19 Sep 2017
Posts: 199
Location: United Kingdom
GPA: 3.9
WE: Account Management (Other)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2019, 06:20
1
Quote:
President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis and the Federal Aviation Administration in July 1981 to discuss a possible air traffic controllers’ strike and how they would have to act legally and politically to handle them.


Hi Folks,
Ambiguous pronouns are problem in the original sentence. Both, they and them, could refer to traffic controllers or President and his team.
A) how they would have to act legally and politically to handle them: Incorrect

B) how to handle them if legal and political action would be required

C) what would be necessary legally and politically for handling such an event : Does not make it clear what would be done legally and politically. "missing action"

D) what legal and political action would be necessary in order to handle such an event : Better than C

E) the necessity of what kind of legal and political action in order to handle it : badly structured sentence plus it does not refer to strike here.

I'll go with D.
_________________
Cheers!!
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 10 Jan 2017
Posts: 247
Location: India
Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2019, 07:41
1
It is D.

President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis and the Federal Aviation Administration in July 1981 to discuss a possible air traffic controllers’ strike and how they would have to act legally and politically to handle them.

A) how they would have to act legally and politically to handle them - them" is plural, the "strike" is singular, also "they" as a pronoun is not having an unambiguous reference here in the sentence .

B) how to handle them if legal and political action would be required - same as A, them cannot refer to singular strike

C) what would be necessary legally and politically for handling such an event - For handling is not correct usage, to+verb (infinitive) required to show the intent.

D) what legal and political action would be necessary in order to handle such an event - Correct.

E) the necessity of what kind of legal and political action in order to handle it - not a clear meaning
_________________
Your limitation—it's only your imagination.
Please hit +1 Kudos if you like my Post.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 07 Jun 2019
Posts: 16
Re: President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2019, 10:15
1
To answer such questions we have to observe the underlined portion very carefully.
As we can see lots of pronouns are being used, we can have a quick look if the pronouns can refer to their nous clearly.
Here we can see, they & them being used which can not refer to a possessive noun controllers’. Thus we can eliminate option A & B.
From remaining Option C is not constructed properly. Option E is complex and does not convey the meaning properly.

Thus option D is the correct choice. :)
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 03 Oct 2018
Posts: 5
Location: Azerbaijan
Sanan Isagov: Sanan Isagov
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
Schools: Amsterdam MBA
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V28
GPA: 4
WE: Corporate Finance (Investment Banking)
Reviews Badge
President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2019, 13:05
1
generis wrote:

Project SC Butler: Day 139: Sentence Correction (SC2)


For SC butler Questions Click Here


President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis and the Federal Aviation Administration in July 1981 to discuss a possible air traffic controllers’ strike and how they would have to act legally and politically to handle them.

A) how they would have to act legally and politically to handle them

B) how to handle them if legal and political action would be required

C) what would be necessary legally and politically for handling such an event

D) what legal and political action would be necessary in order to handle such an event

E) the necessity of what kind of legal and political action in order to handle it


A) they and them has no antecedent here. Controllers' is in possessive case, so its only correct antecedent would be their
B) again no antecedent for them
C) Distorts the meaning. It is not what is necessary legally and politically but rather political and legal action itself
D) Correct
E) Too wordy compared to D. "it" here is ambiguous
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 20 Jul 2018
Posts: 89
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
WE: Consulting (Manufacturing)
President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2019, 21:34
1
President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis and the Federal Aviation Administration in July 1981 to discuss a possible air traffic controllers’ strike and how they would have to act legally and politically to handle them.

A) how they would have to act legally and politically to handle them - who are them?

B) how to handle them if legal and political action would be required - wrong usage of conditional tense and them again (A)

C) what would be necessary legally and politically for handling such an event - sounds betters than all previous answers, so - for handling is wrong

D) what legal and political action would be necessary in order to handle such an event - correct, but strange since only one action is on stake

E) the necessity of what kind of legal and political action in order to handle it - change the meaning
Senior SC Moderator
avatar
V
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 3404
Re: President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Jul 2019, 00:39
I have posted the official explanation HERE
GMAT Club Bot
Re: President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis a   [#permalink] 19 Jul 2019, 00:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by

President Ronald Reagan met with Transportation Secretary Drew Lewis a

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne