It is currently 11 Dec 2017, 02:47

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Princeton Review Sucks Major Sausage

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Posts: 36

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: Toronto, ON Canada
Princeton Review Sucks Major Sausage [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2003, 13:38
HI All,

Just wanted to post this message here since it has been deleted off of the Princeton Review Discussion Group.

Princeton Review is seriously lacking in my opinion. I took the actual prep course and bought the books and I wasnt impressed at all. The topics they cover are so basic that they leave you seriously unprepared for the actual GMAT. Usually when you bring this fact up to either the PR staff of the prep course instructor the usual reply is that PR is not there to teach you actual material rather a mindset or a technique approach to solving GMAT questions. This approach is fine but when the materials focus on such basic concepts as percentage change between two values and pythagorean theory you are left in a panic for the real GMAT.

This of course is just my opinion. I look forward to your responses.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Posts: 63

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Location: Florida

### Show Tags

13 Sep 2003, 17:45
In addition to enjoying the title of your post, I agree with you. I know that many people will disagree, and they're entitled to that, BUT THEY'RE ALSO WRONG LOL. I'm just kidding, some concepts might be helpful to some people. For me they were a worthless waste of time.
_________________

Paul

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 30 Apr 2003
Posts: 30

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Sep 2003, 19:24
I totally disagree. I used PR's strategies for the GMAT and they worked very well for me. However, I also did a lot of work, but both my efforts and their strategies left me very well prepared. If you studied diligently, you shouldn't have been unprepared or panicky.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 16 Jan 2003
Posts: 36

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: Toronto, ON Canada
One more thing [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2003, 07:38
I just wanted to add that I did get into the top MBA program in Canada. Eventhough my GMAT score wasn't stellar my work exeprience and references are what got me in.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Posts: 63

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Location: Florida

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2003, 18:38
With all due respect Mr. Cracker you really can't say that what was effective for you will work for others as well. I studied dilligently and scored well, but I don't attribute this success to picking numbers. Also the other strategies they offered seemed sophomoric and terribly contrived. I would share them, but I don't want to somehow break copyright laws. Actually I think I'd be more concerned about the damage these strategies might do to people's scores. Bad strategies can be very dangerous if released without a disclaimer. As the author said the disclaimer should read something like this.

: Use at your own risk, the strategies below suck major sausage.

blah blah blah
_________________

Paul

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 29 Aug 2003
Posts: 25

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: Earth

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2003, 21:54
Paul, your attitude is somewhat surprising...their strategies didn't work for you, but they obviously worked for GrahamCracker. I used them as well and didn't find them to be sophomoric at all. For whatever reason, they didn't do it for you but to the other side of the argument coin, you shouldn't say that what wasn't effective for you won't be effective for other people. If you didn't do well on your GMAT, it could be just as much your fault as it was their "bad" strategies, if not more. The strategies are a starting point - it's up to us to figure out what works and what doesn't based on how we process information and go with it. I see just as many people who say Kaplan's strategies are terrible, but hundreds of others would disagree. It's about personal preference. Both companies have good strategies otherwise they wouldn't be successful, so I say live and let live - if one doesn't work for you, try the other, but let's at least be respectful and not trash any of these companies unfairly.

(A little keyed up from a late-night Giants/Cowboys overtime game....!)

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Posts: 63

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Location: Florida
Kappa Kappa Gamma [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2003, 18:08
I realized how cocky my attitude was after I wrote the message. I apologize to Mr. Cracker and everyone else who was turned off by it (all of you out there...hello).
Anyway, for whatever reason I felt familiar with every strategy PR offered and was unable to apply the strategies well to tougher problems. It's easier to feel disgruntled to the point where you say something like I did above when you spend 1300 dollars and are not happy with the value. Since my community was bereft of students applying to graduate programs, I was stuffed into a class with Kappa sorority sisters who thought their daddy's were going to buy them a university (does this practice still exist). They were sorely disappointed to find out that some of these schools aren't yet on the market, and some only sell admission (can you imagine that). Perhaps my experience was bad enough that I have been reduced from the bundle of sunshine I typically am to a hardened and cynical crank. I apologize for that.
Maybe the Kappa invasion won't take place at your Princeton program, but in case it does...bring pepper spray!
_________________

Paul

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 19 Jul 2003
Posts: 63

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Location: Florida

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2003, 20:10
Also, I should repeat. I was not unhappy with my scores. They weren't perfect, but that happens. I was unhappy that the Princeton Review seems to have a very cozy relationship with the ditsiest sorority on my campus. While this helped my social life tremendously (thank you Princeton Review..does the house collect?), it did not help my scores as much.
People know that testimonials are just one person's opinion and probably don't need that reiterated for them every time someone sees an opinion they don't like. The old, uhh that's just his opinion routine is too routine. How about this cliche to paraphrase, "a program is only as good as you make it." Yes, well I tried, but I decided that my time spent studying Kaplan was best for me.
_________________

Paul

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

21 Sep 2003, 20:10
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Princeton Review Sucks Major Sausage

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

Moderator: HKD1710

 HOT DEALS FOR NOVEMBER Economist GMAT - Free Free 1-week trial + Free Test Kaplan Courses - Save \$475 \$225 Discount + \$250 Bonus Target Test Prep - \$800 \$50 Discount + \$750 Bonus [GMAT ClubTests and Premium MBA Bundle] EMPOWERgmat - \$99/mo GMAT Club tests included 2nd month GMAT Club Tests - Free Included with every course purchaseof \$149 or more - Full List is here

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.