Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 23 May 2017, 08:16

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Prior to 1975, union efforts to organize public-sector

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 17 Apr 2011
Posts: 8
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 4 [1] , given: 3

Re: Prior to 1975, union efforts to organize public-sector [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2012, 16:54
1
KUDOS
I found OA on another site.

1. A
2. E
3. E
4. B
5. C
6. D
7. C
8. A
9. E

Manager
Joined: 03 Jul 2012
Posts: 136
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GPA: 3.9
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 16

Re: Prior to 1975, union efforts to organize public-sector [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Aug 2012, 11:37
Can somebody explain the following questions:
2. The author cites union efforts to achieve a fully unionized work force (line 13-19) in order to account for why
(A) politicians might try to oppose public-sector union organizing
(B) public-sector unions have recently focused on organizing women
(C) early organizing efforts often focused on areas where there were large numbers of workers
(D) union efforts with regard to public-sector clerical workers increased dramatically after 1975
(E) unions sometimes tried to organize workers regardless of the workers’ initial interest in unionization
3. The author’s claim that, since the mid-1970’s, a new strategy has emerged in the unionization of public-sector clerical workers (line 23) would be strengthened if the author
(A) described more fully the attitudes of clerical workers toward labor unions
(B) compared the organizing strategies employed by private-sector unions with those of public-sector unions
(C) explained why politicians and administrators sometimes oppose unionization of clerical workers
(D) indicated that the number of unionized public-sector clerical workers was increasing even before the mid-1970’s
(E) showed that the factors that favored unionization drives among these workers prior to 1975 have decreased in importance
Manager
Joined: 07 Feb 2008
Posts: 63
Location: United States
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 14

Re: Prior to 1975, union efforts to organize public-sector [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Aug 2012, 14:37
yup, these are the topics I dont want on my GMAT
Intern
Joined: 22 Jun 2013
Posts: 16
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 0

Re: Prior to 1975, union efforts to organize public-sector [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jun 2013, 10:22
Hi. Can someone please help me understand what is question 7 asking for? It seems as if the hypothetical situation it is presenting is exactly the same as the one in the passage. Why should there be any change in the result?
SVP
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2065
Location: New York, NY
Followers: 393

Kudos [?]: 1440 [1] , given: 8

Re: Prior to 1975, union efforts to organize public-sector [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2013, 11:36
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
karan1337 wrote:
raghavakumar85 wrote:
akbism wrote:
Hi,

7. The author implies that if the increase in the number of women in the work force and the impact of the women’s movement were the main causes of the rise in unionization of public-sector clerical workers, then
(A) more women would hold administrative positions in unions
(B) more women who hold political offices would have positive attitudes toward labor unions
(C) there would be an equivalent rise in unionization of private-sector clerical workers(D) unions would have shown more interest than they have in organizing women
(E) the increase in the number of unionized public-sector clerical workers would have been greater than it has been

It is C. In the last paragraph, if you observe the sentence where the author says that a similar prediction was expected for private sector clerical workers but stated a reason for not happening so. It implies that "the author" implies 'C'.

I understood why C is viable, but i'm confused between options A and D

A seems correct as the passage says that women's number has increased in white collar jobs.

In D, if the movement etc is useful then obviously the unions would have shown more interest in organizing women (1st line of 1st para and last line of last paragraph)

Please explain why these are incorrect.

Thanks!

karan1337,

Question #7 asks what would happen if "the increase in the number of women in the work force and the impact of the women’s movement WERE THE MAIN CAUSES of the rise in unionization of public-sector clerical workers"

Well, the last paragraph is where the author talks about the reasons for the rise in unionization. Those reasons are "more women in the work force", "success in legitimizing women political activisim", etc...

Now if there is
1) an increase in # of women in the work force
2) impact of women's movement..

Then what?

Well that last paragraph goes on to say:
"the absence of any comparable increase in unionization among private-sector clerical workers" -- that means the fact that there was NO increase in unionization in the private sector whereas there WAS an increase in unionization in the PUBLIC sector is because...what?

It's because of some "structural" change. The PUBLIC sector had this structural change but the PRIVATE sector did not.

What kind of "structural" change? A structural change in the multi-occupational public-sector unions themselves. What does that mean? Multi-occupational?

Well the following sentences talks about the occupational distribution between white collar and blue collar jobs. Women mostly are in white collared jobs. Over the past 20 years, the distribution has moved towards white collared jobs, subsequently there has been more females in the job market. More females means we have the increase in female workers we just talked about. How did that come about? Through a structural change toward more white-collared jobs from blue-collared jobs. That structural shift in distribution from blue-collared jobs to white-collared jobs explains why women in labor force increased and why unionization efforts increased in the public sector.

Question #7 is an inference question. The "catalyst" for a rise in public-sector unionization is a structural shift that meant more women in the labor force percentage-wise. The "absence" of unionization in the private sector means the private sector must LACK this structural shift. The private sector must LACK an increase in women labor force participation.

But if the private sector DID have that structural "catalyst" and did have higher women labor force participation, this would result in higher unionization.

Essentially, the passage used "critical reasoning" (specifically "negation") to reason that the structural change was a key factor in affecting unionization.

Critical Reasoning Negation Concept
Original: Structural shift --> Unionization (public)
Negation: No structural shift --> No Unionization (private)

If the private sector DID have a structural shift, we would see the outcome of "unionization".

The problem with (A)
(A) more women would hold administrative positions in unions
(A) is too specific. We know that more women are involved under the hypothetical situation brought up in #7. If there is a higher # of women in the work force, then....what?
This is an inference question so whatever that inferred statement is -- among the answer choices -- it must be supported by information in the passage. Where in the passage does it support the fact that women would hold, specifically, more ADMINISTRATIVE positions? No such information in the passage supports this specific claim.

The problem with (D)
(D) unions would have shown more interest than they have in organizing women
Where in the passage does it support the claim that unions would show MORE interest? Heck, we don't even have anywhere in the passage that talks about unions showing interest in organizing women...let alone showing that the interest level would increase. Sure, women are becoming part of these unions and there's more of them, but the passage does not talk about the perspective of the union as a whole and for that entire union, whether or not they would INCREASE their interest in organizing women. Unions do not organize women. Women are the ones that join these unions and participate in them.
Intern
Joined: 07 Jan 2013
Posts: 43
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 570 Q46 V23
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 2.9
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [0], given: 23

Re: Prior to 1975, union efforts to organize public-sector [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jun 2013, 05:30
can anybody elaborate on Q7,, i think the answer might be E but as no OA given not sure whether the answer is correct.

My reasoning is that in the first para the author says the no to 1975 the no. of unionised clerical workers were less and in the para concerning the women the unionisation has increased(wrt no. of clerical workers) thereby increasing the no. of Public sector workers.

this line--> The absence of any comparable increase in unionization among private-sector clerical workers, however, identifies the primary catalyst—the structural change in the multi-occupational public-sector unions themselves suggest that he is talking only about the increase in "public sector clerical workers".

please let me know if the answer and reason is something else.
_________________

Intern
Joined: 08 Dec 2012
Posts: 46
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 28 [1] , given: 12

Re: Prior to 1975, union efforts to organize public-sector [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2013, 06:12
1
KUDOS
These passages are from the old OGs.
I found long passages in some of the portals. These have about 450+ words. When you practise on these passages you have a false idea of the time taken for each question. For example: When I do all the 9 questions and find out the time taken, I find I have done quite well because the total time will be divided by 9 . However, the last few questions will be easier, because I would have got a good grasp of the passage by the 5th question.
However, I need to actually see how long it takes for thE first 4 questions and also the accuracy for the first 4 questions.

I was able to solve the 9 questions in these long passages and found my time per question was only 73 seconds with 7out of 9 questions correct.
But, I was taking 6 minutes for the first 4 questions and the 2 incorrect was always in the first 4. So my accuracy is only 50% .

I don't know how many of you actually understood what I am trying to tell. I suggest you read the passage and answer only the first 4 questions and see your accuracy and time taken. This would help you improve.
In the actual GMAT you get 4 passages of 250 250 250 350 words usually
with 3 3 3 4 questions respectively.

These are my 2 cents...
you may ignore if not useful..
Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2013
Posts: 71
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 11

Re: Prior to 1975, union efforts to organize public-sector [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Apr 2015, 03:20
Hi,
Can anybody please explain why the answer of Q 4 is (b).
We know that the clerical workers were unionized irrespective of their interest. So why isnt the answer (d)?
Manager
Joined: 01 Aug 2014
Posts: 55
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 2

Re: Prior to 1975, union efforts to organize public-sector [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Dec 2015, 19:38
1. According to the passage, the public-sector workers who were most likely to belong to unions in 1977 were:
"compared with 46 percent of government professionals"

2.The author cites union efforts to achieve a fully unionized work force (line 13-19) in order to account for why:
"a fully unionized public work force meant power, no interest in being organized, unions more often than not ignored them"

3. The author’s claim that, since the mid-1970’s, a new strategy has emerged in the unionization of public-sector clerical workers (line 23) would be strengthened if the author:
(E) showed that the factors that favored unionization drives among these workers prior to 1975 have decreased in importance.
" Prior 1975, unions were concerned about power, while the mid-1975 clerical workers increased significantly in unions." Choice E said that the reasons clerical workers attended to unions are different from prior 1975, the purposes of union are different as well, It strengthens the new strategy."

4. Can some one explain and show me where the answer placed in the passage ?

5.The author states that which of the following is a consequence of the women’s movement of recent years?
(C) A more positive attitude on the part of women toward unions
"the women’s movement has succeeded in legitimizing the economic and political activism of women on their own behalf, thereby producing a more positive attitude toward unions."

6. The main concern of the passage is to
(B) explain differences in the unionized proportions " Paragraph 3"
(C) evaluate the effectiveness of certain kinds of labor unions " Paragraph 3"
(D) analyzed and explain an increase in unionization among a certain category of workers. ( cover all 3 passages)
(E) describe and distinguish strategies appropriate to organizing different categories of workers ( Not distinguish strategies)
Manager
Joined: 29 Dec 2014
Posts: 83
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 997

Re: Prior to 1975, union efforts to organize public-sector [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Feb 2016, 21:00
[I understood why C is viable, but i'm confused between options A and D

A seems correct as the passage says that women's number has increased in white collar jobs.

In D, if the movement etc is useful then obviously the unions would have shown more interest in organizing women (1st line of 1st para and last line of last paragraph)

Please explain why these are incorrect.

Thanks!]

"Because there are far more women in white-collar jobs, an increase in the proportion of female members has accompanied the occupational shift and has altered union policy-making in favor of organizing women and addressing women’s issues" - A seems more apt, as the paragraph concedes that the structural change has happened in the public sector and distinguishes it from the private sector. Since there are increasing number of women in the work force who are interested in union, and there is increasing focus on women's issues - likely that women hold more administrative positions
Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2013
Posts: 97
Location: India
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 10

Re: Prior to 1975, union efforts to organize public-sector [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2016, 10:15
Hi,
1.A
2.A
3.E
4.E
5.C
6.D
7.E
8.B
9.C
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 538
Concentration: Technology, Other
Followers: 35

Kudos [?]: 472 [0], given: 606

Re: Prior to 1975, union efforts to organize public-sector [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2016, 22:27
Top Contributor
16 mins all correct. Could have done it in 14 mins.
_________________

--------------------------------------------------------
Regards

Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3164
Followers: 854

Kudos [?]: 7293 [0], given: 1063

Re: Prior to 1975, union efforts to organize public-sector [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2017, 07:56
Top Contributor
Bump the thread for ulterior discussions.

regards
_________________
Manager
Joined: 22 Mar 2014
Posts: 147
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Operations
GMAT 1: 530 Q45 V20
GPA: 3.91
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 99

Re: Prior to 1975, union efforts to organize public-sector [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Mar 2017, 12:32
Can anyone please explain the ans of question 1 and question 8?

I found this passage very difficult... Took 25 mins to ans all questions.... 7 correct out of 9....
Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3164
Followers: 854

Kudos [?]: 7293 [0], given: 1063

Prior to 1975, union efforts to organize public-sector [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Mar 2017, 15:21
Top Contributor
Quote:
In 1977, 34 percent of government clerical (25) workers were represented by a labor organization, compared with 46 percent of government professionals, 44 percent of government blue-collar workers, and 41 percent of government service workers. Since then, however, the biggest increases in public-sector unionization have been among clerical workers.

Here the trap answer is just C. As you can notice from my excerpt of the passage, clerical worker had an increase after 1977; which mean that some other category was biggest. 46 % were professionals. A is the answer.

Quote:
In localities where clerical workers were few in number, were scattered in several workplaces, and expressed no interest in being organized, unions more often than not ignored them in the pre-1975 period.

From red and bold part of the excerpt you infer that for unions were unconvenient in localities to organize the workers in their different categories. A is the answer. Be careful when you read in the stimulus of the question "the author suggest" which means in somehow "what do you infer from the author words"........

Hope this helps
_________________
Prior to 1975, union efforts to organize public-sector   [#permalink] 13 Mar 2017, 15:21

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 35 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Prior to the fall of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), M 0 09 Feb 2017, 01:01
Prior to the fall of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 5 19 Jun 2014, 13:49
Prior to the fall of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics 1 14 Jun 2014, 18:01
4 Although the industrial union organizations that emerged 8 13 Apr 2016, 12:04
Prior to 1975, union efforts to organize public-sector 1 25 Jan 2012, 07:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by