Summer is Coming! Join the Game of Timers Competition to Win Epic Prizes. Registration is Open. Game starts Mon July 1st.

 It is currently 16 Jul 2019, 13:41

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Professor Robinson: A large meteorite impact crater in a

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 908
Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Professor Robinson: A large meteorite impact crater in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

Updated on: 22 Jun 2017, 23:37
1
20
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

41% (02:28) correct 59% (02:37) wrong based on 395 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Professor Robinson: A large meteorite impact crater in a certain region was thought to be the clue to explaining the mass extinction of plant and animal species that occurred at the end of the Mesozoic era. However, the crystalline structure of rocks recovered at the site indicates that the impact that formed this crater was not the culprit. When molten rocks crystallize, they display the polarity of Earth’s magnetic field at that time. But the recrystallized rocks recovered at the site display normal magnetic polarity, even though Earth’s magnetic field was reversed at the time of the mass extinction.

Each of the following is an assumption on which Professor Robinson’s argument depends EXCEPT:

(A) The crater indicates an impact of more than sufficient size to have caused the mass extinction.
(B) The recovered rocks recrystallized shortly after they melted.
(C) No other event caused the rocks to melt after the impact formed the crater.
(D) The recovered rocks melted as a result of the impact that formed the crater.
(E) The mass extinction would have occurred soon after the impact that supposedly caused it.

_________________
The sky is the limit
800 is the limit

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Originally posted by noboru on 20 Jul 2010, 14:37.
Last edited by broall on 22 Jun 2017, 23:37, edited 1 time in total.
Reformatted question
Manager
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Posts: 98
Re: Professor Robinson: A large meteorite impact crater in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

21 Jul 2010, 02:39
Narrowed down to A & B easily as all rest appear clear assumptions.

(A) The crater indicates an impact of more than sufficient size to have caused the mass extinction.

(B) The recovered rocks recrystallized shortly after they melted.

Eliminated A as an assumption as this is what the author is trying to prove.

And then B is more like an assumption which should be true for rocks to reflect the magnetic field from the rocks, formed during the time of the crater formation.
Thus A
_________________
Manager
Joined: 08 Jan 2010
Posts: 101
Re: Professor Robinson: A large meteorite impact crater in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Jul 2010, 23:03
Chose D .........but frankly didn't understand the options and their inference ....................

A......I just don't understand why ?
Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 425
GMAT 1: 530 Q47 V17
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
Re: Professor Robinson: A large meteorite impact crater in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Jan 2015, 11:54
Fact : Meteorite impact crater was the clue to explain the mass extinction of plant and animal.
Conclusion : The impact that formed this crater was not the culprit(for mass Extension)
Supporting Fact : Earth’s magnetic field was reversed at the time of the mass extinction. The recrystallized rocks recovered at the site display normal magnetic polarity(Not reversed Magnetic field) Hence ~ Conclusion.

The Author is trying to tell Ideally if the meteorite impact caused the extinction Those Rocks that are Crystallized(after impact) should have the same reversed Magnetic Field(as that of Earth's). Just because they do not have the author is concluding that meteorite impact did not cause Extension.

Assumption Question should always be approached using Negation Technique: In this Question those Choices that Weaken the Argument when negated should be eliminated

(B) The recovered rocks recrystallized shortly after they melted.
Negation: The recovered rocks did not recrystallized shortly after they melted: This Weakens the Argument as it provides a possibility that: "Impact resulted in Extension and resulted in reversal in Earth’s Magnetic Field , but at the same time explains why the Rocks did not have reversal in Magnetic Field(as they did not Crystallize immediately)" [Alternate Cause]

(C) No other event caused the rocks to melt after the impact formed the crater.
Negation:Other event caused the rocks to melt after the impact formed the crater : This also weakens the Argument as it creates the new possibility that after the impact occurred the Rocks are melted again Crystallized again [Data Error]

(D) The recovered rocks melted as a result of the impact that formed the crater.
Negation: The recovered rocks did not melt as a result of the impact that formed the crater. This also weakens the Argument(It is actually similar to Option B) [Alternate Cause]

(E) The mass extinction would have occurred soon after the impact that supposedly caused it.
Negation: The mass extinction did not occurred soon after the impact that supposedly caused it: This Weakens the argument Ex: The Creates the possibility that meteorite impact further caused Chain of actions that caused the Extension

Manager
Joined: 03 May 2015
Posts: 62
Re: Professor Robinson: A large meteorite impact crater in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

29 Sep 2015, 18:25
noboru wrote:
Professor Robinson: A large meteorite impact crater in a certain region was thought to be the clue to explaining the mass extinction of plant and animal species that occurred at the end of the Mesozoic era. However, the crystalline structure of rocks recovered at the site indicates that the impact that formed this crater was not the culprit. When molten rocks crystallize, they display the polarity of Earth’s magnetic field at that time. But the recrystallized rocks recovered at the site display normal magnetic polarity, even though Earth’s magnetic field was reversed at the time of the mass extinction.
Each of the following is an assumption on which Professor Robinson’s argument depends EXCEPT:
(A) The crater indicates an impact of more than sufficient size to have caused the mass extinction.
(B) The recovered rocks recrystallized shortly after they melted.
(C) No other event caused the rocks to melt after the impact formed the crater.
(D) The recovered rocks melted as a result of the impact that formed the crater.
(E) The mass extinction would have occurred soon after the impact that supposedly caused it.

Though not sure.. i guess the wording in A makes it wrong..

The crater indicates an impact of more than sufficient size to have caused the mass extinction

no need to be more than suff size.. can create mass extinction even if the crater is of suff size..

Manager
Joined: 03 May 2017
Posts: 91
Re: Professor Robinson: A large meteorite impact crater in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Jun 2017, 13:59
1
This is an arduous question as we are looking for 4 assumptions among non-assumptions, so it might take more time to answer. However, it's clear why A is the answer as the size of the impact that caused the crater is irrelevant to whether the crater can explain the extinction. The other options somehow connected the premise to the conclusion.
Intern
Joined: 27 Dec 2015
Posts: 29
Re: Professor Robinson: A large meteorite impact crater in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Jun 2017, 13:44
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Status: GMAT and GRE tutor
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 2666
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
Re: Professor Robinson: A large meteorite impact crater in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

22 Jun 2017, 18:49
IIMC wrote:

This is a confusing passage, so let's start with the conclusion: "the crystalline structure of rocks recovered at the [impact] site indicates that the impact that formed this crater was not the culprit" responsible for the mass extinction of plant and animal species that occurred at the end of the Mesozoic era.

What is the point of this passage?

The first sentence describes an explanation that had previously been accepted: "A large meteorite impact crater in a certain region was thought to be the clue to explaining the mass extinction of plant and animal species that occurred at the end of the Mesozoic era."

However, evidence from the "the crystalline structure of rocks recovered at the site" goes against that explanation. So, there was a commonly held view, and then new evidence suggested that the prevailing view was not accurate.

What was that evidence?

• The "Earth’s magnetic field was reversed at the time of the mass extinction."
• "The recrystallized rocks recovered at the [impact] site display normal magnetic polarity."
• "When molten rocks crystallize, they display the polarity of Earth’s magnetic field at that time."
• Thus, we can infer that the rocks recovered at the site--if they were molten--did not crystallize at the time of the mass extinction.
• In other words, if molten rock was in fact created by the meteorite impact and if that impact occurred at the time of the extinction, then we would expect the recrystallized rocks recovered at the site to display reversed magnetic polarity. Thus, according to the author, the fact that the rocks display normal magnetic polarity is evidence that the impact that formed the crater was not the cause of the mass extinction.

Each of the following is an assumption on which Professor Robinson’s argument depends EXCEPT:

(A) The author argues that the evidence from the rocks suggests that the impact that formed the crater was NOT the cause of the mass extinction. If (A) were not true, then it would be further evidence to SUPPORT the author's argument. Thus, (A) is not a required assumption and might be our answer.

(B) What if the meteorite did cause the extinction at a time when the magnetic field was reversed, but then it took thousands of years for the molten rocks to recrystallize? By that time, the Earth's magnetic field may have returned to normal, explaining why the recrystallized rocks recovered at the impact site display normal magnetic polarity. This would disrupt the author's logic, so (B) is a required assumption.

(C) What if the molten rocks crystallized at the time of the extinction (giving them reversed magnetic polarity), but then, years later, when the magnetic field was normal, the rocks melted again and recrystallized? That would explain why the recrystallized rocks recovered at the impact site display normal magnetic polarity, disrupting the author's logic. (C) is a required assumption.

(D) If the rocks did not melt as a result of the impact that formed the crater, then their polarity would not be an indication of the Earth's polarity at the time of the impact. Thus, the crystalline structure of the rocks recovered at the site would be irrelevant, and the author's argument would fall apart. (D) is a required assumption.

(E) Perhaps the impact occurred at a time when the Earth's polarity was normal, but it took hundreds or thousands of years for the effects of that impact to finally cause the mass extinction. For example, maybe the impact set off a chain reaction that would, after hundreds of years, significantly alter the temperature of the planet, thus causing a mass extinction. By the time the extinction took place, the polarity of the Earth may have become reversed. This would explain why the polarity of the recrystallized rocks recovered at the impact site does not match the polarity of the Earth at the time of the extinction. Thus, (E) is a required assumption.

Only (A) is not a required assumption, so (A) is the best answer.
_________________
GMAT/GRE tutor @ www.gmatninja.com (we're hiring!) | GMAT Club Verbal Expert | Instagram | Blog | Bad at PMs

Beginners' guides to GMAT verbal: RC | CR | SC

YouTube LIVE verbal webinars: Series 1: Fundamentals of SC & CR | Series 2: Developing a Winning GMAT Mindset

SC & CR Questions of the Day (QOTDs), featuring expert explanations: All QOTDs | Subscribe via email | RSS

Need an expert reply? Hit the request verbal experts' reply button; be specific about your question, and tag @GMATNinja. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.

SC articles & resources: How to go from great (760) to incredible (780) on GMAT SC | That "-ing" Word Probably Isn't a Verb | That "-ed" Word Might Not Be a Verb, Either | No-BS Guide to GMAT Idioms | "Being" is not the enemy | WTF is "that" doing in my sentence?

RC, CR, and other articles & resources: All GMAT Ninja articles on GMAT Club | Using LSAT for GMAT CR & RC |7 reasons why your actual GMAT scores don't match your practice test scores | How to get 4 additional "fake" GMAT Prep tests for \$29.99 | Time management on verbal
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 4757
Re: Professor Robinson: A large meteorite impact crater in a  [#permalink]

Show Tags

19 Sep 2018, 05:39
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
Re: Professor Robinson: A large meteorite impact crater in a   [#permalink] 19 Sep 2018, 05:39
Display posts from previous: Sort by