Hi
eGmat,
Thanks for the pronoun myth buster article. +1 kudos!
I've a doubt about 'white tiger' excercise question.
egmat wrote:
iv. The White Tiger is nicknamed “the Lightning” because it moves very quickly.
The pronoun “it” is ambiguous in its usage. It is not clear if “it” refers to “White Tiger” or “Lightning”. Observe that both the following sentences make perfect sense.
a. The White Tiger is nicknamed “the Lightning” because the white tiger moves very quickly.
b. The White Tiger is nicknamed “the Lightning” because lightning moves very quickly.
So there is a pronoun usage error in this sentence.
The White Tiger is nicknamed “the Lightning” because it moves very quickly.I thought this sentence is unambiguous because 'white tiger' is the only logical antecedent of 'it'.
As sentence clearly mentions, 'the lightning' is a nickname given to white tiger.
So how can a nickname be a possible antecedent of the pronoun 'it'?
You mentioned that the sentence -
'the lightning' moves quickly - is fine. But it is not the actual lightning, but rather a nickname.
How can a nickname move quickly? I searched through GMATPrep SC document to find similar sentences, but didn't find any.
I would appreciate if you could clarify the doubt and share some official sentences in which a pronoun is refering to the meaning of a nickname rather than to the nickname itself.
- Santy.
I would appreciate if anybody could explain why the pronoun is ambiguous. As Santy pointed out, the nickname cannot move quickly. On the other hand, we know what " The Lightning" is - the tiger - so, having that in mind, it makes clear that both inputs refer to the tiger. What's wrong with this reasoning?