GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 19 Jan 2019, 18:54

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
• ### FREE Quant Workshop by e-GMAT!

January 20, 2019

January 20, 2019

07:00 AM PST

07:00 AM PST

Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score.
• ### Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

January 19, 2019

January 19, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.

# Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 of official

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 13 Nov 2014
Posts: 46
GMAT 1: 590 Q42 V29
GMAT 2: 630 Q47 V29
Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 of official  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2015, 18:55
carcass wrote:
Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 of officially assessed value. Reassessments should be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates. In practice, however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government—that is, when their effect is to increase total tax revenue.

If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so?

Property values have risen sharply and uniformly.

Property values have all risen—some very sharply, some less so.

Property values have for the most part risen sharply; yet some have dropped slightly.

Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly.

Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly.

I came across this question today at mba.com and even if I understood the logic behind I do not know how to list this CR

Try it. Thanks

Hi carcass
Can you please explain how D is better than E,
Because if all the property values have dropped then also government is not likely to do the assessment.
_________________

-----------------------------------------
Consider Cudos if you like this post.
-----------------------------------------

Joined: 12 Jul 2015
Posts: 70
Location: Singapore
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V39
WE: Operations (Investment Banking)
Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 of official  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2015, 19:19
dav90 wrote:
carcass wrote:
Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 of officially assessed value. Reassessments should be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates. In practice, however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government—that is, when their effect is to increase total tax revenue.

If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so?

Property values have risen sharply and uniformly.

Property values have all risen—some very sharply, some less so.

Property values have for the most part risen sharply; yet some have dropped slightly.

Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly.

Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly.

I came across this question today at mba.com and even if I understood the logic behind I do not know how to list this CR

Try it. Thanks

Hi carcass
Can you please explain how D is better than E,
Because if all the property values have dropped then also government is not likely to do the assessment.

Karishma from Veritas actually explained it earlier. You should read the post entries before asking the same question. She explained in detail the meaning of "property values change at differential rates"

In summary, reassessments SHOULD occur WHEN property values change at DIFFERENT rates = some decrease by a lot while others decrease/increase by a little = NOT uniform

The problem with E is that the prices dropped uniformly. That's not "differential rates" and therefore reassessment is NOT needed, which does not fulfil the question stem which asks for a scenario in which a reassessment is needed.
Manager
Joined: 25 Sep 2015
Posts: 107
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
GPA: 3.26
Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 of official  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jan 2016, 09:34
carcass wrote:
Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 of officially assessed value. Reassessments should be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates. In practice, however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government—that is, when their effect is to increase total tax revenue.

If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so?

Property values have risen sharply and uniformly.

Property values have all risen—some very sharply, some less so.

Property values have for the most part risen sharply; yet some have dropped slightly.

Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly.

Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly.

I came across this question today at mba.com and even if I understood the logic behind I do not know how to list this CR

Try it. Thanks

Kind of tricky. But good question.

ABC are out because the question states it is unlikely to do so - that means total tax revenues would go down. That is the majority of the tax is down.

E does not satisfy that it 'reassessment should occur' because it has not risen at all.

D is the correct answer.
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2599
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)
Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 of official  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2016, 17:56
Bunuel wrote:

GMAT weekly questions

Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 of officially assessed value. Reassessments should be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates. In practice, however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government - that is, when their effect is to increase total tax revenue.

If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so?

A. Property values have risen sharply and uniformly.
B. Property values have all risen - some very sharply, some less so.
C. Property values have for the most part risen sharply; yet some have dropped slightly.
D. Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly.
E. Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly.

wow..to be honest..I would have not understood the argument if I were not involved in a property purchase for the company I work at the moment and learned what the reassessments mean...
so...if the price go up or go down at different rates - then reassessment.
if the prices go up at different rates - then most likely the property will be reassessed.
if the prices go down at different rates - reassessment needs to be done, but the government will hesitate to do so...since it wants more \$\$ as tax payments...

A. values have risen sharply and uniformly - it is more likely that the properties would be reassessed ... so no.
B. all values have risen - sharply and not so - definitely reassessments would come very soon.
C. properties have risen sharply, yet some dropped slightly - MOST PART so >50+ % have risen - definitely will be reassessed.
D. most values have dropped, but some rose. so 50+% dropped, and some 1-49% rose. since it is an overall drop, the government would not want to reassess the properties.. so looks good.
E. a good contender...but D is more strong.
Intern
Joined: 26 Jul 2016
Posts: 21
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
WE: Analyst (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 of official  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Oct 2016, 01:35
mikeCoolBoy wrote:
IMO the best you can do is to diagram the stimulus

property values change at differential rates ---> Reassessments should occur

In reality

a reassessment has occurred ---> is likely that the reassessment has benefited the government, increasing the total revenue

If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should
occur but is unlikely to do so?

The key to this problem is to rephrase the question

a situation in which a reassessment should occur, the property values should change at different rates.
the reassessment is unlikely to do --> the reassessment won't benefit the government ---> the reassessment won't increase the total revenue

so you are looking for an answer in which the property values change at different rates but in which they don't increase the total revenue

(A) Property values have risen sharply and uniformly.

Eliminate this because the rates are not different

(B) Property values have all risen – some very sharply, some less so.

All the property values have risen, so they have increased the total revenue. out

(C) Property values have for the most part risen sharply yet some have dropped slightly.

This is results in an increase of the revenue. out

(D) Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly.

Correct. Different rates and in global the revenue has decreased

(E) Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly.

not different rates

Clear Explanation , Thanks.
But I have a doubt, If the property rates have dropped significantly and risen scarcely(option D) , the total revenue and tax for govt is low. so government is likely to have reassessment no? If the property rates have risen considerably and dropped scarcely (option C) then Government is getting a lot in Taxes and thus increased revenue but a reassessment is necessary , however it is unlikely to happen.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2174
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 of official  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Nov 2017, 21:22
Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 of officially assessed value. Reassessments should be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates. In practice, however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government—that is, when their effect is to increase total tax revenue.

If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so?

(A) Property values have risen sharply and uniformly. - Incorrect - we are talking about distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates

(B) Property values have all risen—some very sharply, some less so. - - Incorrect - we are talking about distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates

(C) Property values have for the most part risen sharply yet some have dropped slightly. - Incorrect - reassessment is likely since it will lead to increased revenue for government

(D) Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly. - Correct

(E) Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly. - Incorrect - we are talking about distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates

_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 of official &nbs [#permalink] 11 Nov 2017, 21:22

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 26 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 of official

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.