It is currently 18 Oct 2017, 08:10

# Live Now:

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 27 May 2009
Posts: 268

Kudos [?]: 529 [0], given: 18

Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$ 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2009, 07:37
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

85% (hard)

Question Stats:

48% (01:44) correct 52% (01:31) wrong based on 852 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

106. Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$ 1,000 of officially assessed value. Reassessments should
be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates. In practice,
however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government – that is, when their effect is to
increase total tax revenue.
If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should
occur but is unlikely to do so?
(A) Property values have risen sharply and uniformly.
(B) Property values have all risen – some very sharply, some less so.
(C) Property values have for the most part risen sharply yet some have dropped slightly.
(D) Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly.
(E) Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly.

Pls explain the argument as well as the answer OA:
[Reveal] Spoiler:
D
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 529 [0], given: 18

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Jul 2009
Posts: 314

Kudos [?]: 392 [5], given: 9

Re: Property taxes are typically set [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2009, 08:36
5
KUDOS
IMO the best you can do is to diagram the stimulus

property values change at differential rates ---> Reassessments should occur

In reality

a reassessment has occurred ---> is likely that the reassessment has benefited the government, increasing the total revenue

If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should
occur but is unlikely to do so?

The key to this problem is to rephrase the question

a situation in which a reassessment should occur, the property values should change at different rates.
the reassessment is unlikely to do --> the reassessment won't benefit the government ---> the reassessment won't increase the total revenue

so you are looking for an answer in which the property values change at different rates but in which they don't increase the total revenue

(A) Property values have risen sharply and uniformly.

Eliminate this because the rates are not different

(B) Property values have all risen – some very sharply, some less so.

All the property values have risen, so they have increased the total revenue. out

(C) Property values have for the most part risen sharply yet some have dropped slightly.

This is results in an increase of the revenue. out

(D) Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly.

Correct. Different rates and in global the revenue has decreased

(E) Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly.

not different rates

Kudos [?]: 392 [5], given: 9

Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Mar 2009
Posts: 302

Kudos [?]: 587 [2], given: 22

Re: Property taxes are typically set [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2009, 08:47
2
KUDOS
two statements from the argument
stmt1: Reassessments are mad when property values
change at differential rates

From stmt1,
change at differential rates==> increase as well as decrease of property rates

stmt2: Reassessments occur when they benefit government to increase total tax revenue

From stmt2,
to increase total tax revenue, most property values must increase. the question is when reassessment needed but it is not done by government, then it implies most property values decrease.
D clearly explains of most property value decreaese and some rise to prove stmt1 that reassessments are needed.

A. no differential rates so no reassessments needed

B. no differential rates , all have risen

C. differential rates are there so one condition is met, but most property values risen , then it would benefit government and reassessment would occur ( for us reassessment should not occur)

E. same as A no differential rates so no reassessments needed

Kudos [?]: 587 [2], given: 22

Senior Manager
Joined: 27 May 2009
Posts: 268

Kudos [?]: 529 [0], given: 18

Re: Property taxes are typically set [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Aug 2009, 00:34
Thanks Guys.... Got it.. Kudos to both of you

Kudos [?]: 529 [0], given: 18

Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3353

Kudos [?]: 9044 [9], given: 1152

Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2012, 17:27
9
KUDOS
12
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 of officially assessed value. Reassessments should be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates. In practice, however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government—that is, when their effect is to increase total tax revenue.

If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so?

Property values have risen sharply and uniformly.

Property values have all risen—some very sharply, some less so.

Property values have for the most part risen sharply; yet some have dropped slightly.

Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly.

Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly.

I came across this question today at mba.com and even if I understood the logic behind I do not know how to list this CR

Try it. Thanks
_________________

Last edited by carcass on 06 Nov 2012, 01:39, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 9044 [9], given: 1152

Director
Status: Done with formalities.. and back..
Joined: 15 Sep 2012
Posts: 636

Kudos [?]: 653 [2], given: 23

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: Olin - Wash U - Class of 2015
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2012, 20:02
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
carcass wrote:
Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 of officially assessed value. Reassessments should be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates. In practice, however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government—that is, when their effect is to increase total tax revenue.

If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so?

Property values have risen sharply and uniformly.

Property values have all risen—some very sharply, some less so.

Property values have for the most part risen sharply; yet some have dropped slightly.

Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly.

Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly.

I came across this question today at mba.com and even if I understood the logic behind I do not know how to list this CR

Try it. Thanks

"a situation in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so"

Reassessment should occur when property value changes at differential rates - A & E out
among B,C and D, only D provides a case where new taxes would be lower if reassessment is done. So it is highly unlikely that the reassesment would be done. (reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government).

Hence Ans D it is!
_________________

Lets Kudos!!!
Black Friday Debrief

Kudos [?]: 653 [2], given: 23

Moderator
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1218

Kudos [?]: 1659 [1], given: 116

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2012, 23:42
1
KUDOS
Rates must have increased ununiformly or decreased ununiformly or there should have been increase in certain areas and decrease in other areas. So only B,C & D remain. Reassessment will not occur unless there has been more increase than decrease. So only D stands the test.

Kudos Please... If my post helped.
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

Kudos [?]: 1659 [1], given: 116

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7674

Kudos [?]: 17347 [6], given: 232

Location: Pune, India
Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2012, 00:19
6
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
carcass wrote:
Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 of officially assessed value. Reassessments should be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates. In practice, however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government—that is, when their effect is to increase total tax revenue.

If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so?

Property values have risen sharply and uniformly.

Property values have all risen—some very sharply, some less so.

Property values have for the most part risen sharply; yet some have dropped slightly.

Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly.

Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly.

I came across this question today at mba.com and even if I understood the logic behind I do not know how to list this CR

Try it. Thanks

You might have come across mimic questions. You are given a particular argument and you have to find another argument which uses the same logic or you are given a situation and you have to find examples of that situation etc. This is a type of mimic question.
Understand the argument:
Property taxes are set at a flat rate per \$1,000 of officially assessed value.
When property values change at differential rates, reassessment should happen.
In practice, reassessments occur when they increase total tax revenue.

When will total tax revenue increase? When the total assessed value increases.
Reassessments are needed when property values change at differential rates (rates of some properties go up, for some go down or for some go up steeply and for some go up slightly). But they will probably happen only when overall, the reassessed value will be higher than previous value (and when values change at differential rate)

In part D, the values have changed at differential rates so reassessment should happen. But the reassessed value will be lower than the current value so it will probably not happen.

_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17347 [6], given: 232

Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3353

Kudos [?]: 9044 [0], given: 1152

Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2012, 01:50
Well Boys and Girls (Karishma)

I'm not completely sure about the question resemble mimic the argument.

Mimic are soooo rare and unique (in OG 12th and 13th I do not remember it at all); moreover, they always say the word "mimic"

This question seems something like the role of the argument (bold face) without a bold or inference. A hybrid..........mah weird; it is one of those things that gmat does to make you completely out of balance or nervous. Even though it was not so difficult.

Thanks
_________________

Kudos [?]: 9044 [0], given: 1152

Manager
Joined: 10 Jan 2011
Posts: 232

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 25

Location: India
GMAT Date: 07-16-2012
GPA: 3.4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2012, 02:05
Argument provides a particular phenomenon which is generally true and ask to Evaluate the situation in which the phenomenon is not true.

Phenomenon: Property tax is calculated based on the property value. Reassessment should be done if property value changes drastically. In practice government does reassessment only when property value has gone up.

Question ask us to evaluate a situation in which as per the phenomenon reassessment should be done but as per the practice government will not do the reassessment.

only option D provides such a situation.

I would say this is a evaluate problem.
_________________

-------Analyze why option A in SC wrong-------

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 25

Moderator
Joined: 02 Jul 2012
Posts: 1218

Kudos [?]: 1659 [0], given: 116

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Nov 2012, 02:07
I remember seeing a question type as "Provide an example" somewhere. This question seem sto suit that structure.

Kudos Please... If my post helped.
_________________

Did you find this post helpful?... Please let me know through the Kudos button.

Thanks To The Almighty - My GMAT Debrief

GMAT Reading Comprehension: 7 Most Common Passage Types

Kudos [?]: 1659 [0], given: 116

Intern
Joined: 29 Mar 2013
Posts: 3

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$ 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2013, 06:37
A and E out, cause property values risen and dropped uniformly.

B and C -- in both these cases property values as whole increased. Ideally govt will reassess the taxes so that owners have to pay more. This reassessment is omething Govt will be looking to do, since these scenarios increase the tax revenue to Govt. So both out.

For D -- Explanation is similar to B and C, but in reverse. So Govt will not want to reassess in this scenario, cause it would mean less revenue to Govt.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

Intern
Joined: 29 Mar 2013
Posts: 3

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$ 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Mar 2013, 06:37
A and E out, cause property values risen and dropped uniformly.

B and C -- in both these cases property values as whole increased. Ideally govt will reassess the taxes so that owners have to pay more. This reassessment is omething Govt will be looking to do, since these scenarios increase the tax revenue to Govt. So both out.

For D -- Explanation is similar to B and C, but in reverse. So Govt will not want to reassess in this scenario, cause it would mean less revenue to Govt.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 2

Manager
Joined: 29 Apr 2013
Posts: 99

Kudos [?]: 296 [0], given: 53

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT Date: 11-06-2013
WE: Programming (Telecommunications)
Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$ 1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Sep 2013, 08:41
rohansherry wrote:
Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$ 1,000 of officially assessed value. Reassessments should
be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates. In practice,
however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government – that is, when their effect is to
increase total tax revenue.
If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should
occur but is unlikely to do so?
(A) Property values have risen sharply and uniformly.
(B) Property values have all risen – some very sharply, some less so.
(C) Property values have for the most part risen sharply yet some have dropped slightly.
(D) Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly.
(E) Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly.

GMAT people posted this question today on their Facebook page. And I marked a wrong answer (E)
Actually I couldn't understand the meaning of "differential". So what does "differential" mean here?
_________________

Do not forget to hit the Kudos button on your left if you find my post helpful

Collection of some good questions on Number System

Kudos [?]: 296 [0], given: 53

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10117

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2014, 00:05
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 04 May 2013
Posts: 354

Kudos [?]: 149 [1], given: 70

Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
Schools: XLRI GM"18
GPA: 4
WE: Human Resources (Human Resources)
Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Jan 2014, 10:09
1
KUDOS
WE HAVE TO LOOK FOR A SCENARIO WHERE SITUATION DEMANDS REASSESSMENT DUE TO PROPERTY VALUE CHANGES AT DIFFERENTIAL RATES YET GOVERNMENT NOT IMPLEMENTING IT AS IT DOES NOT BENEFIT BUT RATHER LOSES.....

If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so?

Property values have risen sharply and uniformly.NO DIFFERENTIAL FACTOR....HENCE NOT APPLICABLE

Property values have all risen—some very sharply, some less so. GOVERNMENT BENEFITTING AND WILL GO FOR REASSESSMENT

Property values have for the most part risen sharply; yet some have dropped slightly.DIFFERENTIAL RATES ARE THERE BUT GOVERNMENT BENEFITTING AND WILL GO FOR REASSESSMENT

Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly.....DIFFERENTIAL RATES APPLICABLE BUT GOVERNMENT WILL NOT GO FOR REASSESSMENT AS IT WILL BE AT LOSS...

Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly......NO DIFFERENTIAL FACTOR....HENCE NOT APPLICABLE

Kudos [?]: 149 [1], given: 70

Manager
Status: suffer now and live forever as a champion!!!
Joined: 01 Sep 2013
Posts: 147

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 75

Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Apr 2014, 01:58
The question clearly mentions that " In practice, however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government".

and question asks "which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so?"

Between D and E , E is ruled out because reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government and in choice E reassessments does not benefit the government.

Where as in D , Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly.

Govt has for some reason to reassess the properity taxes, but unable to do that because most Property values have for the most part dropped significantly.

Kudos [?]: 68 [0], given: 75

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 41885

Kudos [?]: 128722 [0], given: 12182

Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 of official [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2014, 23:54
Expert's post
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED

GMAT weekly questions

Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 of officially assessed value. Reassessments should be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates. In practice, however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government - that is, when their effect is to increase total tax revenue.

If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so?

A. Property values have risen sharply and uniformly.
B. Property values have all risen - some very sharply, some less so.
C. Property values have for the most part risen sharply; yet some have dropped slightly.
D. Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly.
E. Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 128722 [0], given: 12182

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 41885

Kudos [?]: 128722 [2], given: 12182

Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 of official [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Sep 2014, 23:55
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Bunuel wrote:

GMAT weekly questions

Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 of officially assessed value. Reassessments should be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates. In practice, however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government - that is, when their effect is to increase total tax revenue.

If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so?

A. Property values have risen sharply and uniformly.
B. Property values have all risen - some very sharply, some less so.
C. Property values have for the most part risen sharply; yet some have dropped slightly.
D. Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly.
E. Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly.

If most property values have dropped significantly, but some have risen slightly, a reassessment should occur (since values have changed at different rates) but is unlikely (since it will not benefit the government). Thus choice D describes the required situation and is the best answer.
According to the passage, choices A and E describe the situations in which there is no need for a reassessment, since change has occurred uniformly. Similarly, choices B and C both describe situations in which a reassessment should occur, and is likely to, since the government will benefit.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 128722 [2], given: 12182

Affiliations: Oracle certified java programmer , adobe certified developer
Joined: 14 Jul 2013
Posts: 119

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 37

GMAT Date: 02-12-2015
GPA: 3.87
WE: Programming (Telecommunications)
Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Dec 2014, 01:09
carcass wrote:
Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000 of officially assessed value. Reassessments should be frequent in order to remove distortions that arise when property values change at differential rates. In practice, however, reassessments typically occur when they benefit the government—that is, when their effect is to increase total tax revenue.

If the statements above are true, which of the following describes a situation in which a reassessment should occur but is unlikely to do so?

Property values have risen sharply and uniformly.

Property values have all risen—some very sharply, some less so.

Property values have for the most part risen sharply; yet some have dropped slightly.

Property values have for the most part dropped significantly; yet some have risen slightly.

Property values have dropped significantly and uniformly.

I came across this question today at mba.com and even if I understood the logic behind I do not know how to list this CR

Try it. Thanks

conclusion : rates when increase benefit Govt.- > Govt. then reassessed values
OA: D - rated did not increase -> so no reassessment, but slight increase shows Govt. shd have reassessed
_________________

IF IT IS TO BE , IT IS UP TO ME

Kudos [?]: 26 [0], given: 37

Re: Property taxes are typically set at a flat rate per \$1,000   [#permalink] 26 Dec 2014, 01:09

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 32 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by