It is currently 23 Jun 2017, 12:19

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 484
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 May 2013, 11:15
13
KUDOS
Expert's post
33
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

45% (02:58) correct 55% (01:35) wrong based on 2316 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses to each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry while critics denounce the relaxations as a leeway that increases the revenue of the production houses but damages the moral character of the children.

A) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry
B) Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works to be vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry.
C) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allows production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry
D) Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide the producers enough space to make creative pieces of work vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry
E) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider the relaxations to be vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry

OA after discussions, good explanations will receive kudos!!
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

Intern
Joined: 11 Dec 2012
Posts: 15
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Schools: HKUST '15 (S)
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 May 2013, 11:50
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
A) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry -> "them" is ambiguous.
B) Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works to be vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry. -> Doesn't answer roponents of what? Different from the original sentence.
C) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allows production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry -> "them" is ambiguous.
D) Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide the producers enough space to make creative pieces of work vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry -> Changes the meaning of sentence and implies creative pieces of work are vital; Also, it doesn't answer roponents of what? Different from the original sentence.
E) Proponents of relaxations that local governments allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider the relaxations to be vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry -> No ambiguity, no change in meaning of the original sentence. Correct answer.
Manager
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 247
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GMAT Date: 07-25-2013
GPA: 3.83
WE: Architecture (Computer Hardware)
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 May 2013, 12:09
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
The answer choice E efficiently changes from censor board to local governments and makes clear referent to them and also preserves the original meaning of sentence
_________________

"Giving kudos" is a decent way to say "Thanks" and motivate contributors. Please use them, it won't cost you anything

Manager
Joined: 12 Dec 2012
Posts: 156
Location: Poland
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 May 2013, 12:19
15
KUDOS
Vercules wrote:
Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses to each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry while critics denounce the relaxations as a leeway that increases the revenue of the production houses but damages the moral character of the children.

Let's build on the non-underline part:
"critics denounce the relaxations"
The correct AC should be parallel. It is correct to move the verb before the essential modifier, which is long as ours "that Censorship Board allow production houses to each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works"

Quote:
A) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry

Not parallel
Quote:
B) Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works to be vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry.

Parallel, but: "consider sb to be" is not my dream. "Proponents of what?" is a good remark, but if we have one issue discussed and both proponens and opponents, their aim is rather clear. I hope so at least.
Quote:
C) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allows production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry

Not parallel.
Quote:
D) Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide the producers enough space to make creative pieces of work vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry

Parallel. "consider sh + adj" is correct. My choice.
Quote:
E) Proponents of relaxations that local governments allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider the relaxations to be vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry

Not parallel. "consider sh to be" again.
_________________

If I answered your question with this post, use the motivating power of kudos!

Last edited by HumptyDumpty on 05 May 2013, 12:42, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Joined: 02 Sep 2012
Posts: 247
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GMAT Date: 07-25-2013
GPA: 3.83
WE: Architecture (Computer Hardware)
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 May 2013, 12:35
1
KUDOS
Can you explain what both entities your considering as parallel?
_________________

"Giving kudos" is a decent way to say "Thanks" and motivate contributors. Please use them, it won't cost you anything

Manager
Joined: 12 Dec 2012
Posts: 156
Location: Poland
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 May 2013, 12:46
9
KUDOS
skamal7 wrote:
Can you explain what both entities your considering as parallel?

"While" introduces the second clause, so the words following it should be parallel to the words opening the first clause:

1st: "Proponents of relaxations [that super long modifier] consider" should be "Proponents consider relaxations [modifier] +noun/adjective" in order to be parallel to:
2nd clause: "while critics denounce the relaxations as..."
_________________

If I answered your question with this post, use the motivating power of kudos!

Intern
Joined: 11 Dec 2012
Posts: 15
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
Schools: HKUST '15 (S)
WE: Consulting (Computer Software)
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 May 2013, 12:59
HumptyDumpty wrote:
Vercules wrote:
Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses to each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry while critics denounce the relaxations as a leeway that increases the revenue of the production houses but damages the moral character of the children.

Let's build on the non-underline part:
"critics denounce the relaxations"
The correct AC should be parallel. It is correct to move the verb before the essential modifier, which is long as ours "that Censorship Board allow production houses to each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works"

Quote:
A) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry

Not parallel
Quote:
B) Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works to be vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry.

Parallel, but: "consider sb to be" is not my dream. "Proponents of what?" is a good remark, but if we have one issue discussed and both proponens and opponents, their aim is rather clear. I hope so at least.
Quote:
C) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allows production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry

Not parallel.
Quote:
D) Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide the producers enough space to make creative pieces of work vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry

Parallel. "consider sh + adj" is correct. My choice.
Quote:
E) Proponents of relaxations that local governments allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider the relaxations to be vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry

Not parallel. "consider sh to be" again.

In D, does vital refer to the creative pieces of work or to the relaxations?
Also, if the reason you stated in B is correct (and now I think so too), then B should be the correct answer.

BTW, I just noticed that only the option C correctly uses "allows" instead of "allow".
Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3211
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 May 2013, 15:57
2
KUDOS
Based on ligic and meaning Proponents consider something NOT proponent of relaxations consider

b and D

In B them is ackward and seems refers to houses that is right from grammatical standing point BUT not from the meaning

The sentence becomes too long and without "control"; instead if we put a subject we have sense of the whole situation

D makes sense

BTW Board is plural so C go out immediately
_________________
Intern
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 10
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 May 2013, 02:20
5
KUDOS
Let me try to explain with the 3-2 technique.
Just after the underline portion we have "while critics denounce the relaxations". so our answer choice should be in parallel with this part- tat is "proponents consider relaxations".

So we are down to two answer choices- B and D.

now let us scrutinize B and D closely. the only difference between B and D is the use of the phrase "the producers" in option D as against "them" in option B. Now in option B "them" can refer to either 'censorship board' or 'production houses'. So this is ambiguous.

Clearly D is the corect option.

IMO D.
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 16 Jun 2012
Posts: 1127
Location: United States
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 May 2013, 01:08
5
KUDOS
carcass wrote:
BTW Board is plural so C go out immediately

Carcass.

I think The censorship board is singular, not plural. e.g. the censorship board of Australia.
The plural version of "the board" is "the Boards".

For instance:
(1) The board of directors is meeting this afternoon ==> means directors server for only 1 board in a company.
(2) Boards of directors generally set broad corporate policy. ==> means directors serve on a number of different boards of directors.

_________________

Please +1 KUDO if my post helps. Thank you.

"Designing cars consumes you; it has a hold on your spirit which is incredibly powerful. It's not something you can do part time, you have do it with all your heart and soul or you're going to get it wrong."

Chris Bangle - Former BMW Chief of Design.

Senior Manager
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 484
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 May 2013, 01:33
2
KUDOS
Expert's post
pqhai wrote:
carcass wrote:
BTW Board is plural so C go out immediately

Carcass.

I think The censorship board is singular, not plural. e.g. the censorship board of Australia.
The plural version of "the board" is "the Boards".

For instance:
(1) The board of directors is meeting this afternoon ==> means directors server for only 1 board in a company.
(2) Boards of directors generally set broad corporate policy. ==> means directors serve on a number of different boards of directors.

Hi pqhai,

You are correct, "board" is singular. Carcass, Answer choice (C) is incorrect because of the ambiguous pronoun "them" and the subject-verb agreement error in which the singular verb "allows" does not agree with the plural "relaxations". Moreover, "proponents of relaxations" is not parallel with "critics denounce"

Vercules
_________________

Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3211
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 May 2013, 03:14
Vercules wrote:
pqhai wrote:
carcass wrote:
BTW Board is plural so C go out immediately

Carcass.

I think The censorship board is singular, not plural. e.g. the censorship board of Australia.
The plural version of "the board" is "the Boards".

For instance:
(1) The board of directors is meeting this afternoon ==> means directors server for only 1 board in a company.
(2) Boards of directors generally set broad corporate policy. ==> means directors serve on a number of different boards of directors.

Hi pqhai,

You are correct, "board" is singular. Carcass, Answer choice (C) is incorrect because of the ambiguous pronoun "them" and the subject-verb agreement error in which the singular verb "allows" does not agree with the plural "relaxations". Moreover, "proponents of relaxations" is not parallel with "critics denounce"

Vercules

ya ya sorry my mistake

a collective noun. sometimes a lapsus pop out of my mind
_________________
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3964
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 May 2013, 07:27
1
KUDOS
My musings are: 1. Are proponents and proponents of relaxation the same? No; there is substantial difference in the meaning. We must carry the proponents of relaxations in the other choices. Otherwise they are invalid; So B and D are out.

2. The pronouns are playing havoc; them in two places in A, referring to two different nouns, them in B., them in C, them in E are all highly ambiguous. This leaves us only D, which is already out, as my first issue.

3. A censor Board is a specialist body, meant for a specific purpose. It is by all means a more efficient team. To change it local government is not desirable; there is deep alteration of intent in E.

4. Consider to be In B and E. are dubious idioms.

Of the above four, which is the most passable error?
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Manager
Joined: 13 Dec 2012
Posts: 110
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 May 2013, 06:47
first error ...proponents consider relaxation is wrong !! proponents of what ...? proponents of relaxations ..... (guys who prefer and want relaxations ) ... so b and d are out . A and C have ambiguous pronoun them ...plus c uses allows that throws out A and C . For me answer then has to be E (keepin my fingers crossed ! ).
Intern
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Posts: 16
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 3.5
WE: Operations (Transportation)
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 May 2013, 23:59
1
KUDOS
ishancrazee wrote:
first error ...proponents consider relaxation is wrong !! proponents of what ...? proponents of relaxations ..... (guys who prefer and want relaxations ) ... so b and d are out . A and C have ambiguous pronoun them ...plus c uses allows that throws out A and C . For me answer then has to be E (keepin my fingers crossed ! ).

I believe D is preferable over E because of Parallelism.......... Proponents consider the relaxations is parallel to Critics denounce the relaxations.

and if u r asking 'proponents of what' than you should ask 'critics of what ?' too.

correct me if i am wrong........
Manager
Joined: 09 Apr 2013
Posts: 209
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT 1: 710 Q44 V44
GMAT 2: 740 Q48 V44
GPA: 3.1
WE: Sales (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 May 2013, 00:43
I like D... but I am still sorely perplexed with how "relaxation" is being used.... all answers seem very idiomatically incorrect to me. Also, why is there no "the" in front of Censorship Board? what is the source of this question?
Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2011
Posts: 117
Location: India
WE: Marketing (Manufacturing)
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 May 2013, 03:41
2
KUDOS
IMO

Proponents consider X vital for economic growth while critics denounce the X as a leeway that increases the revenue of the production houses but damages the moral character of the children.

X = "relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide the producers enough space to make creative pieces of work"

Only d does this in a right way

A) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry. The 2 thems refer to two different things Production houses and relaxations. not consistent...moreover the that clause might describe proponents
B) Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works to be vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry.
C) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allows production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry
D) Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide the producers enough space to make creative pieces of work vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry
E) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider the relaxations to be vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry it seems the that clause is modifying proponents
Senior Manager
Status: Making every effort to create original content for you!!
Joined: 23 Dec 2010
Posts: 484
Location: United States
Concentration: Healthcare, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GMAT 2: 750 Q49 V42
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 May 2013, 04:50
3
KUDOS
Expert's post
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
good discussion guys, updated the post with OA nd OE

Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses to each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry while critics denounce the relaxations as a leeway that increases the revenue of the production houses but damages the moral character of the children.

Do not go by the wordiness of this question. If you are able to identify the grammatical construction the question becomes pretty straightforward.

(A) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry

The pronoun "them" in the phrase "provide them enough …" clearly refers to "production houses," the immediately preceding plural noun. However, the pronoun "them" is used again in the phrase "consider them vital ….,"; in this usage its antecedent is unclear. “them” should logically refer to the "relaxations" but based on its position in the sentence it could also refer to “production houses”.

(B) Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works to be vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry.

In placing "consider" at the beginning of the sentence, this choice is able to avoid a second use of the pronoun "them," correcting the pronoun issue. However, the use of "to be" in this context is unidiomatic. The proper idiom is "consider x y" not "consider x to be y." In this case "consider tax breaks . . . vital tools" is unidiomatic and thus incorrect.

(C) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allows production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry

This choice does not solve the pronoun problem from the original sentence. Moreover it creates another error by using the singular verb “allows” for the plural noun “relaxations”.

(D) Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide the producers enough space to make creative pieces of work vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry

CORRECT. In placing "consider" at the beginning of the sentence, this choice is able to avoid a second use of the pronoun "them," correcting the pronoun issue. It does not contain any other awkward or wordy construction.

(E) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider the relaxations to be vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry

This choice avoids any pronoun ambiguity by replacing the second "them" in the original sentence with the use of "relaxations" after “consider.” However, the repetition of "relaxations" makes this choice somewhat wordy. A more apparent error is the use of "to be", which makes the construction “consider X to be Y” incorrect. Proper idiom is “consider X Y.”
_________________

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 329
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 May 2013, 19:16
Vercules wrote:
Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses to each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry while critics denounce the relaxations as a leeway that increases the revenue of the production houses but damages the moral character of the children.

A) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry
B) Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works to be vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry.
C) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allows production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry
D) Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide the producers enough space to make creative pieces of work vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry
E) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider the relaxations to be vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry

OA after discussions, good explanations will receive kudos!!

When i first read this sc , it screws up with my mind. What is it trying to say ? I can't fathom in one read. I read it again. I see the pronoun them , what is the them referring to ? Is it proponents or is it production houses ? i eliminate A.
I read B. The idiom Consider x,y is the correct usage not Consider x, to be Y. Eliminated.
In C again the pronoun "them" - Eliminated.
In D, Everything makes sense. Them is replaced by a noun. Consider x, y is correctly used. Potential Answer.
In E , again them. Eliminated.
Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 329
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 May 2013, 19:28
HumptyDumpty wrote:
Vercules wrote:
Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses to each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry while critics denounce the relaxations as a leeway that increases the revenue of the production houses but damages the moral character of the children.

Let's build on the non-underline part:
"critics denounce the relaxations"
The correct AC should be parallel. It is correct to move the verb before the essential modifier, which is long as ours "that Censorship Board allow production houses to each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works"

Quote:
A) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry

Not parallel
Quote:
B) Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative piece of works to be vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry.

Parallel, but: "consider sb to be" is not my dream. "Proponents of what?" is a good remark, but if we have one issue discussed and both proponens and opponents, their aim is rather clear. I hope so at least.
Quote:
C) Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allows production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider them vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry

Not parallel.
Quote:
D) Proponents consider relaxations that Censorship Board allow production houses each year to provide the producers enough space to make creative pieces of work vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry

Parallel. "consider sh + adj" is correct. My choice.
Quote:
E) Proponents of relaxations that local governments allow production houses each year to provide them enough space to make creative pieces of work consider the relaxations to be vital for the economic growth of the entertainment industry

Not parallel. "consider sh to be" again.

Humpty,
I like your approach ;however, when i read the modifying clause it is so freaking convoluted that i just have to eliminate on the basic of them. I also notice that in answer choices that replace pronoun with the actual noun are often the correct answer choice. Hence in my mind D wins because of that.
-Blue
Re: Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow   [#permalink] 20 May 2013, 19:28

Go to page    1   2   3   4    Next  [ 69 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
4 Since 1992, when the board of directors voted to allow 5 12 Apr 2016, 23:06
The United States has relaxed 4 26 Feb 2015, 03:25
1 Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow produc 3 28 Aug 2014, 03:39
10 Proponents of relaxations that Censorship Board allow 8 01 Apr 2017, 07:41
8 Proponents of artificial intelligence say they will be able 44 11 Oct 2016, 11:51
Display posts from previous: Sort by