It is currently 24 Nov 2017, 06:19

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Proposal: Carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere block

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1205

Kudos [?]: 847 [0], given: 0

Location: Taiwan
Proposal: Carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere block [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Dec 2004, 06:39
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:38) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 11 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Proposal: Carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere block the escape of heat into space. So emission of these â€œgreenhouseâ€

Kudos [?]: 847 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 683

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Dec 2004, 06:46
Pick D.

We need to counter the objection "methane generates carbon dioxide that is released into the atmosphere".
D says that CO2 is a lesser evil than methane.

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 721

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

Location: Milwaukee

### Show Tags

15 Dec 2004, 09:17
Agree with D, good explanations gayathri
_________________

Praveen

Kudos [?]: 32 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1205

Kudos [?]: 847 [0], given: 0

Location: Taiwan

### Show Tags

02 Jan 2005, 00:29
gayathri wrote:
Pick D.

We need to counter the objection "methane generates carbon dioxide that is released into the atmosphere".
D says that CO2 is a lesser evil than methane.

Hello, I think choice C is also right.

Could you tell me why not C?

thank you

Kudos [?]: 847 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 683

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Jan 2005, 07:03
chunjuwu, C is not a good choice because it does not counter the objection, infact it is in favor of the objection.

The q stem says that "greenhouse" gases are bad because they cause global warming. Methane and CO2 are green house gases.

The objection raised is that by using methane as a fuel, more CO2 ( a greenhouse gas) is released in the atmosphere and hence will lead to global warming. => Do not use methane as a fuel.

C: states that they will replace a fuel which does not release an greenhouse gases such as methane or CO2 with methane which releases CO2. In this case the objection is justified because use of methane will lead to global warming. It does not counter the objection raised.

HTH

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1205

Kudos [?]: 847 [0], given: 0

Location: Taiwan

### Show Tags

02 Jan 2005, 09:02
gayathri wrote:
chunjuwu, C is not a good choice because it does not counter the objection, infact it is in favor of the objection.

The q stem says that "greenhouse" gases are bad because they cause global warming. Methane and CO2 are green house gases.

The objection raised is that by using methane as a fuel, more CO2 ( a greenhouse gas) is released in the atmosphere and hence will lead to global warming. => Do not use methane as a fuel.

C: states that they will replace a fuel which does not release an greenhouse gases such as methane or CO2 with methane which releases CO2. In this case the objection is justified because use of methane will lead to global warming. It does not counter the objection raised.

HTH

Sorry, I still cannot get it. Could someone help me?

I am supposed the C's meaning is that:
If we don't burn methane to produce electricity, then the methane would
be used as a substitute which orginally decrease the greenhouse level.

In other words, we should burn the methane, or we will deteriorate the atmosphere.

Does it not couter the objection?

Kudos [?]: 847 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Posts: 683

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Jan 2005, 10:30
chunjuwu wrote:
Sorry, I still cannot get it. Could someone help me?

I am supposed the C's meaning is that:
If we don't burn methane to produce electricity, then the methane would
be used as a substitute which orginally decrease the greenhouse level.

In other words, we should burn the methane, or we will deteriorate the atmosphere.

Does it not couter the objection?

Chunjuwu: Lets look at C again. We know from the objection that Methane releases CO2. Basically, if you use methane as a fuel you are replacing methane with CO2. So, your argument is very valid IF CO2 is better than methane. But if CO2 has the same or worse effect than methane, then you are just replacing methane with a more undesirable gas.

This brings us to statement D which says that CO2 is more desirable when compared to methane. So it counters the objection by saying that though we introduce CO2 in the place of methane, CO2 is less harmful than methane...

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1205

Kudos [?]: 847 [0], given: 0

Location: Taiwan

### Show Tags

02 Jan 2005, 23:49
gayathri wrote:
chunjuwu wrote:
Sorry, I still cannot get it. Could someone help me?

I am supposed the C's meaning is that:
If we don't burn methane to produce electricity, then the methane would
be used as a substitute which orginally decrease the greenhouse level.

In other words, we should burn the methane, or we will deteriorate the atmosphere.

Does it not couter the objection?

Chunjuwu: Lets look at C again. We know from the objection that Methane releases CO2. Basically, if you use methane as a fuel you are replacing methane with CO2. So, your argument is very valid IF CO2 is better than methane. But if CO2 has the same or worse effect than methane, then you are just replacing methane with a more undesirable gas.

This brings us to statement D which says that CO2 is more desirable when compared to methane. So it counters the objection by saying that though we introduce CO2 in the place of methane, CO2 is less harmful than methane...

Thanks very much , gayathri

I get it now.

Kudos [?]: 847 [0], given: 0

Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10134

Kudos [?]: 271 [0], given: 0

Re: Proposal: Carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere block [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Oct 2014, 14:36
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 271 [0], given: 0

Re: Proposal: Carbon dioxide and methane in the atmosphere block   [#permalink] 03 Oct 2014, 14:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by