Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

I may be getting my basics wrong coz . Can you check my thought process out

5 people can sit in 5!=120 ways now if we consider 5 seats with s1 and s2 as siblings and x as other people we have following arrangements

s1 s2 x x x x s1 s2 x x x x s1 s2 x x x x s1 s2 A total of 4 and since s1 and s2 can interchange we have possible ways to sit as 2*4 so total is 120-8

obviously this is wrong but i cant fathom the reason any help is appreciated

Ofcorse its wrong and even you know it. and the reason for this is bacause here you are only considering the sitting arrangements of s1 and s2, but what about those three x's which are all different. those 3 different x's can be arranged in 3! ways which is 6 and then u multiply by 8 which is 48. 120-48 = 72.

Ideally I would use this method: No restrictions: 5!ways = 120 With restrictions- when two of them are always together: 4!*2! = 48 Therefore, required answer = 120- 48 = 72

I don't know why I am odd one out since I didn't get the solution as stated in previous posts.

Consider S1,S2 to be siblings and S3,S4 another.

Then people saying !4. But what if I put them as shown below:

S4..S2..S3..S1 (And surely this is one of the arrangement which we will get through !4).

So, isn't it wrong to count it.

Please suggest/advise in which part I am going wrong.

Rgds, TGC!

Don't know which solution you are referring to but notice that there are 5 children, not 4.

If among 5 children there are 2 siblings, in how many ways can the children be seated in a row so that the siblings do not sit together?

(A) 38 (B) 46 (C) 72 (D) 86 (E) 102

{# of arrangement where the siblings do not sit together} = {total # of arrangements of 5 children} - {# of arrangements where the siblings sit together}.

{total # of arrangements of 5 children} = 5! = 120.

{# of arrangements where the siblings sit together}: Consider two siblings as one unit {S1, S2}. In this case 4 units {S1, S2}, {X}, {Y}, {Z} can be arrangement in 4! ways. Siblings within their unit can be arranged in 2 ways: {S1, S2} or {S2, S1}. Hence # of arrangements where the siblings sit together is 4!*2 = 48.

{# of arrangement where the siblings do not sit together} = 120 - 48 = 72.

how many questions we get in Permutations, combinations in real GMAT?

you should expect 1-2 questions from each topic.....

1-2 max probability, 1-2 MAX combinations, etc

Unless you have absolutely MASTERED topics such as algebra, arithmetic (ie factors, LCM), inequalities etc which are absolutely basic, my advice would be to stick to the basics for combinametrics......

if i say the 48(the number of combination that two siblings will sit together) is from first sit is 2 (choose 1 sibling out of 2) second sit is 1 (there is only one sibling left to choose) third sit is 3 (there are 3 other people who are not sibling can choose from) forth sit is 2 (there are 3 other people who are not sibling can choose from) fifth sit is 1 (.....) (2*1*3*2*1)*4 the 4 is from: s1 s2 x x x x s1 s2 x x x x s1 s2 x x x x s1 s2

Ideally I would use this method: No restrictions: 5!ways = 120 With restrictions- when two of them are always together: 4!*2! = 48 Therefore, required answer = 120- 48 = 72

This seams to be an good method, unfortunately I don´t seem to understand why I put 4!*2!, but not 5!*2!

Guys, what if there are 3 siblings? the combinations of sitting together would be 3! (3!) or 3! (3) ??

3! (3!) is correct.

Approach should be- Treat 3 Siblings as one, hence now total no. of kids would be 3. So 3 kids will be seated in 3! way, while 3 siblings can arrange themselves in 3! ways. So total ways would be 3!.3!
_________________

If among 5 children there are 2 siblings, in how many ways can the children be seated in a row so that the siblings do not sit together?

(A) 38 (B) 46 (C) 72 (D) 86 (E) 102

Total no.of ways in which the children could be seated so that the siblings do not sit together equals to ( = )Total no.of seating for 5 children minus (-) Total number of seating possible when the children could be seated so that the siblings do sit together

=5! - (2!4!) =120-48 =72
_________________

" Make more efforts " Press Kudos if you liked my post

Another way to solve the problem - there are 3 children another than the siblings. If they sit in any order there will be a 4 places where we can adjust the siblings and thereby they won't be sitting together. Total ways = (4C2)(2)(3!)

where, 4C2 - selections of any 2 - arrangement of siblings. spots out of 4 2 - arrangement of siblings 3! - arrangement of the 3 children.

total number of ways = 5! = 120 2 siblings cannot sit together.So consider them as 1 unit. total ways in which 4 people can sit = 4! = 24 the 2 siblings can sit among themselves in 2! ways.

I don't know why I am odd one out since I didn't get the solution as stated in previous posts.

Consider S1,S2 to be siblings and S3,S4 another.

Then people saying !4. But what if I put them as shown below:

S4..S2..S3..S1 (And surely this is one of the arrangement which we will get through !4).

So, isn't it wrong to count it.

Please suggest/advise in which part I am going wrong.

Rgds, TGC!
_________________

Rgds, TGC! _____________________________________________________________________ I Assisted You => KUDOS Please _____________________________________________________________________________

Rgds, TGC! _____________________________________________________________________ I Assisted You => KUDOS Please _____________________________________________________________________________