It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 03:57

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Q11: In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 11 Jan 2007
Posts: 197

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 0

Location: Bangkok
Q11: In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2007, 08:26
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Q11:
In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting lobsters from the territorial waters of the country of Belukia. Soon after, the annual tonnage of lobster legally harvested in Belukian waters began declining; in 1996, despite there being no reduction in the level of legal lobster fishing activity, the local catch was 9,000 tons below pre-1992 levels. It is therefore highly likely that the outlaw fishing boats harvested about 9,000 tons of lobster illegally that year.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A. The illegal lobster harvesting was not so extensive that the population of catchable lobsters in Belukia’s territorial waters had sharply declined by 1996.
B. The average annual lobster catch, in tons, of an outlaw fishing boat has increased steadily since 1992.
C. Outlaw fishing boats do not, as a group, harvest more lobsters than do licensed lobster-fishing boats.
D. The annual legal lobster harvest in Belukia in 1996 was not significantly less than 9,000 tons.
E. A significant proportion of Belukia’s operators of licensed lobster-fishing boats went out of business between 1992 and 1996.
_________________

cool

Kudos [?]: 94 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Posts: 609

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Location: New Haven, CT

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2007, 09:07
I would say that A is correct.

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 24 Jun 2006
Posts: 129

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2007, 09:40
I go for A
the population should stay the same from 1992 to now in order to maintain the conclsuion that 9000 was illegally harvested.
if total population decreased since 1996 due to extensive illegal activities, then 9000 tons possibly can't be charged to the illegal activities

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 901

Kudos [?]: 118 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2007, 10:19
That's correct.
It should be A.

-Brajesh

Kudos [?]: 118 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 851

Kudos [?]: 143 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2007, 10:22
Straight B.

Last edited by vineetgupta on 18 Jul 2007, 10:12, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 143 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 29 May 2007
Posts: 96

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2007, 14:07
Interesting..Waht's OA

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 15 Jul 2007
Posts: 15

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2007, 19:50
I'm going to go with B here.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 05 Jul 2007
Posts: 55

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2007, 21:54
I'm down to A or B
I like the explanation for A, but I don't see why that's better than B. If the writer is trying to pin the blame on the poachers, the "not so extensive" part in A almost tones the argument down a bit. The fact that the outlaw catch had increased steadily since '92 seems to support the claim for the decline in legal catches during that time.
What's OA?
Any other explanations out there?

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 29 May 2007
Posts: 96

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2007, 22:22
A sounds very counter to the possible assumption. When the stem concludes that poachers are responsible for declining trend how come A be the answer. Stem says Legal fishing has been constant and the only possibilty for SHARP decline as stated is that Poachers are fishing by several bounds. So A's usage of "not extensive" is very counter-intuitive.

I go for B

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 05 Mar 2007
Posts: 112

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

16 Jul 2007, 23:08
Quote:
Soon after, the annual tonnage of lobster legally harvested in Belukian waters began declining; in 1996, despite there being no reduction in the level of legal lobster fishing activity, the local catch was 9,000 tons below pre-1992 levels. It is therefore highly likely that the outlaw fishing boats harvested about 9,000 tons of lobster illegally that year.

The statement here states that the population of lobsters in '96, is comparable with that in pre 1992 so that the 9000 missing from the legal catch are attributable to illegal catch! Also it says that there was no reduction in legal activity! There fore the only assumption is that the catch by illegal activity has steadily increased! This would resolve why legal activity is still very active but has to contend with a lesser bounty.

Quote:
A. The illegal lobster harvesting was not so extensive that the population of catchable lobsters in Belukia’s territorial waters had sharply declined by 1996.
B. The average annual lobster catch, in tons, of an outlaw fishing boat has increased steadily since 1992.
C. Outlaw fishing boats do not, as a group, harvest more lobsters than do licensed lobster-fishing boats.
D. The annual legal lobster harvest in Belukia in 1996 was not significantly less than 9,000 tons.
E. A significant proportion of Belukia’s operators of licensed lobster-fishing boats went out of business between 1992 and 1996.

B it is.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

16 Jul 2007, 23:08
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Q11: In 1992 outlaw fishing boats began illegally harvesting

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.