It is currently 22 Jun 2017, 15:49

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Question Help

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2010
Posts: 261
Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q36 V31
GPA: 3

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2010, 08:34
A newborn kangaroo, or joey, is born after a short gestation period of only 39 days. At this stage, the joey’s hind limbs are not well developed, but its forelimbs are well developed, so that it can can climb from the cloaca into its mother’s pouch for further development. The recent discovery that ancient marsupial lions were also born with only their forelimbs developed supports the hypothesis that newborn marsupial lions must also have needed to climb into their mothers’ pouches.

The argument in this passage relies on which of the following assumptions?

[A] All animals that are born after a short gestation period are born with some parts of their bodies underdeveloped.
[B] Well developed forelimbs would have been more advantageous to ancient marsupial lions than well developed hind limbs would have been.
[C] If the newborn marsupial lion did not climb into its mother’s pouch, then paleontologists would be able to find evidence of this fact.
[D] Newborn marsupial lions that crawled into their mothers’ pouches could not have done so had they not had only their forelimbs developed at birth.
[E] Newborn marsupial lions would not have had only their forelimbs developed if this development were of no use to the marsupial lions.
_________________

petrifiedbutstanding

Intern
Joined: 27 Jul 2009
Posts: 20

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2010, 09:35
we need to find an assumption that supports the fact that
newborn marsupial lions need strong forelimbs to climb into their mothers’ pouches.

[A] All animals that are born after a short gestation period are born with some parts of their bodies underdeveloped. all animals and some part underdeveloped => deviates from the qsns at hand , is out of scope
[B] Well developed forelimbs would have been more advantageous to ancient marsupial lions than well developed hind limbs would have been. we cant comment on how hind limbs would have helped and this is not the assumption we can base our answer on
[C] If the newborn marsupial lion did not climb into its mother’s pouch, then paleontologists would be able to find evidence of this fact. this is not an assumption, if we dont have evidence for it does not mean it cannot happen BUT this tell us to assume that ok the marsupial did climb into the pouch but does not answer that wether it used its forelimbs or not
[D] Newborn marsupial lions that crawled into their mothers’ pouches could not have done so had they not had only their forelimbs developed at birth.ok, they might not be able to do so, but we dont have concrete evidence saying that lions did climb into the pouch
[E] Newborn marsupial lions would not have had only their forelimbs developed if this development were of no use to the marsupial lions.this is the closest to the answer, it tells us that the developed forelimbs solved a purpose and the only purpose we can think of is that it helped the lions climb into the pouch

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2010
Posts: 261
Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q36 V31
GPA: 3

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2010, 09:40
Thanks.

When analysing this, how do you make certain that the conclusion being drawn is to do with the development of forelimbs rather than the process of the lion climbing into the mother's pouch for further development?

That is what confused me into choosing C.
_________________

petrifiedbutstanding

Intern
Joined: 27 Jul 2009
Posts: 20

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2010, 10:02
1
KUDOS
Quote:
Thanks.

When analysing this, how do you make certain that the conclusion being drawn is to do with the development of forelimbs rather than the process of the lion climbing into the mother's pouch for further development?

That is what confused me into choosing C.

The recent discovery that ancient marsupial lions were also born with only their forelimbs developed supports the hypothesis that newborn marsupial lions must also have needed to climb into their mothers’ pouches.

it says the they already thought that the lions climbed into the pouch, and the discovery that they also had strong forelimbs supports that thot... so the conclusion we are drawing here is not the process of climbing but that strong forelimbs aid in climbing...
Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Oct 2010
Posts: 261
Location: India
GMAT 1: 560 Q36 V31
GPA: 3

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2010, 11:17
oh ok.. that helps. thanks a ton.
_________________

petrifiedbutstanding

Re: Question Help   [#permalink] 10 Nov 2010, 11:17
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
help 1 14 Nov 2010, 17:13
Help - Probabilty question 3 on test 25 3 06 Apr 2010, 12:04
SC question - help needed 1 15 Jan 2010, 18:13
GMAT Question 3 08 Jun 2009, 15:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Question Help

Moderator: Bunuel

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.