It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 18:27

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Questions 17-18 Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 20 Apr 2005
Posts: 584

Kudos [?]: 287 [0], given: 0

Questions 17-18 Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 May 2005, 15:55
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (02:13) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Questions 17-18

Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist, has convincingly demonstrated that his theory about the determinants of rat behavior generates consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze. On the basis of this evidence, Dr. Ladlow has claimed that his theory is irrefutably correct.

Anson: Then Dr. Ladlow is not responsible psychologist. Dr. Ladlow’s evidence does not conclusively prove that his theory is correct. Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect.

17. Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Anson’s argument?
(A) Dr. Ladlow’s evidence that his theory generates consistently accurate predictions about how rates will perform in a maze is inaccurate.
(B) Psychologists who can derive consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze from their theories cannot responsibly conclude that those theories cannot be disproved.
(C) No matter how responsible psychologists are, they can never develop correct theoretical explanations.
(D) Responsible psychologists do not make predictions about how rats will perform in a maze.
(E) Psychologists who accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect are responsible psychologists.

18. Anson bases his conclusion about Dr. Ladlow on which one of the following?
(A) an attack on Dr. Ladlow’s character
(B) the application of a general principle
(C) the use of an ambiguous term
(D) the discrediting of facts
(E) the rejection of a theoretical explanation

Kudos [?]: 287 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
User avatar
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5032

Kudos [?]: 452 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 May 2005, 19:38
17. Which one of the following can be properly inferred from Anson’s argument?
(E) Psychologists who accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect are responsible psychologists.
- E is obviously what Anson is driving at.

18. Anson bases his conclusion about Dr. Ladlow on which one of the following?
(A) an attack on Dr. Ladlow’s character
I'll go with (A) on this one. Anson bases his conclusion on the fact that Dr Ladlow is not a responsible psychologist.

Kudos [?]: 452 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 10 Dec 2004
Posts: 273

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 May 2005, 22:03
17) b
18) b



A) Dr. Ladlow’s evidence that his theory generates consistently accurate predictions about how rates will perform in a maze is inaccurate.
(B) Psychologists who can derive consistently accurate predictions about how rats will perform in a maze from their theories cannot responsibly conclude that those theories cannot be disproved.
Yes.

(C) No matter how responsible psychologists are, they can never develop correct theoretical explanations.
(D) Responsible psychologists do not make predictions about how rats will perform in a maze.
(E) Psychologists who accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect are responsible psychologists.
Wrong.
If A then B. Does not mean If B then A.

Conclusion: Dr. L is not resonsible...

18. Anson bases his conclusion about Dr. Ladlow on which one of the following?
(A) an attack on Dr. Ladlow’s character
wRONG. this is his conclusion not basis of conclusion
(B) the application of a general principle

Yes. His conclusion is based on princile that responsible scientits.......
(C) the use of an ambiguous term
(D) the discrediting of facts
(E) the rejection of a theoretical explanation
_________________

"Forums are meant to benefit all. No one is interested in knowing what your guesses are. Please explain the reasoning behind the answer you chose. This will also help you organize your thoughts quickly during the exam."

Kudos [?]: 203 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2005
Posts: 32

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 May 2005, 01:53
(E) and (B) without doubt.

Initially, for (18), even I thot that the answer shud be (A) since Anson attacks the character of Dr. But on a closer observation found that the conclusion is based on a general principle which Anson states in the end.
So, (B).

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 7

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Re: CR: Psychologist [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Feb 2011, 21:55
E ignores the possibility that psychologists can "accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect" and still NOT be "responsible psychologists".

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 1

Director
Director
avatar
Status: Impossible is not a fact. It's an opinion. It's a dare. Impossible is nothing.
Affiliations: University of Chicago Booth School of Business
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 871

Kudos [?]: 399 [0], given: 123

Reviews Badge
Re: CR: Psychologist [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Feb 2011, 06:37
1. E is reversal of causality. Inference cannot be in reverse direction.
B by POE

2. B by POE.
Anson follows the principle - "Responsible psychologists always accept the possibility that new evidence will show that their theories are incorrect. "

Kudos [?]: 399 [0], given: 123

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 27 Oct 2010
Posts: 179

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 20

Re: CR: Psychologist [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Feb 2011, 10:10
17) The wording 'cannot responsibly conclude' in B scared me. But E does not sound good either and uses almost same wording as in stimulus, which is always a red flag. So, chose B.
18) Somewhat easier than 17. B. Ladlow applies a general principle. I have seen 'attack on character' as correct answer very rarely even though that answer choice seems to be ubiquitous.

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 20

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2010
Posts: 202

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 5

Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q44 V39
Re: CR: Psychologist [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Feb 2011, 00:27
I initially chose E and B. But on closer excmination, its B and B.

Kudos [?]: 41 [0], given: 5

Re: CR: Psychologist   [#permalink] 04 Feb 2011, 00:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Questions 17-18 Zelda: Dr. Ladlow, a research psychologist,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.