GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 18 Jun 2018, 01:03

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# RAGCT Day 1: From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2012
Posts: 122
Re: RAGCT Day 1: From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Sep 2014, 11:16
1
I've chosen the alternative reason!
Manager
Status: How easy it is?
Joined: 09 Nov 2012
Posts: 112
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, General Management
GMAT 1: 650 Q50 V27
GMAT 2: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Operations (Other)
Re: RAGCT Day 1: From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Sep 2014, 11:27
1
Very tricky question, can't say got it completely till the time I OA is posted.
Director
Status: Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 893
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: RAGCT Day 1: From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Sep 2014, 11:32
1
Just replace plastic bottles with some other thing such that overall weight of plastic bottles reduce in % compared to weight of aluminum cans.
_________________

Piyush K
-----------------------
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison
Don't forget to press--> Kudos
My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use? | 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New)
Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".

Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Posts: 90
Re: RAGCT Day 1: From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Sep 2014, 12:08
1
Good question , Hope I got it right !
_________________

Best
MKS
Appreciate it with Kudos !!

Manager
Joined: 29 May 2013
Posts: 77
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 4
Re: RAGCT Day 1: From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Sep 2014, 23:00
1
souvik101990 wrote:
From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for a steadily decreasing percentage of the total weight of domestic garbage in the Brazil. The increasingly widespread practice of recycling aluminum and plastic was responsible for most of this decline. However, although aluminum recycling was more widely practiced in this period than plastic recycling, it was found that the weight of plastic bottles in domestic garbage declined by a greater percentage than the weight of aluminum cans.

Which of the following, if true of the Brazil in the period 2000 to 2010, most helps to account for the finding?

A. Plastic bottles are significantly heavier than aluminum cans of comparable size.

B. Recycled aluminum cans were almost all beverage containers, but a significant fraction of the recycled plastic bottles had contained products other than beverages.

C. Manufacturers replaced many plastic bottles, but few aluminum cans, with polymer containers.

D. The total weight of plastic bottles purchased by domestics increased at a slightly faster rate than the total weight of aluminum cans.

E. In many areas, plastic bottles had to be sorted by color of the plastic before being recycled, whereas aluminum cans required no sorting.

Day 1 Question of the Verbal Contest: Race Against the GMAT Club Timer

Hope I am correct .
I am have scheduled gmat test on 10/28/14.
Manager
Joined: 30 Oct 2012
Posts: 67
Location: India
WE: Marketing (Manufacturing)
Re: RAGCT Day 1: From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Sep 2014, 23:36
1
Where is OA for the Question. When it is going to be posted
_________________

i am the master of my fate, I am the captain of my soul

Intern
Joined: 04 Jul 2013
Posts: 33
Schools: ISB '16
Re: RAGCT Day 1: From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2014, 13:10
1
Hope i got it right! waiting for the OA
Intern
Joined: 26 Jun 2014
Posts: 10
Re: RAGCT Day 1: From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2014, 08:58
1
I hope i am not too late to join in ^.^ . Great question.
MBA Section Director
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 5176
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: RAGCT Day 1: From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2014, 11:02
OAs off this week questions will be posted on Monday (as per the rules), along with the winners.
Meanwhile, The new question is out!
_________________
MBA Section Director
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 5176
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: RAGCT Day 1: From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Sep 2014, 09:51
Day 5 question posted
_________________
Intern
Joined: 09 Jun 2014
Posts: 6
Re: RAGCT Day 1: From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Sep 2014, 11:13
Good question ! I think i answered it correctly, though not sure !
Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2011
Posts: 41
Re: RAGCT Day 1: From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Sep 2014, 15:02
Awaiting OA. Thank you the question.
MBA Section Director
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 5176
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: RAGCT Day 1: From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2014, 11:15
1
Week 1 winners declared
_________________
Manager
Joined: 27 May 2014
Posts: 91
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, General Management
Schools: HKUST '15, ISB '15
GMAT Date: 12-26-2014
GPA: 3
Re: RAGCT Day 1: From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Sep 2014, 13:27
Thanks for the question.Fortunately, i got it right
_________________

Success has been and continues to be defined as Getting up one more time than you have been knocked down.

Manager
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 116
Re: RAGCT Day 1: From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Sep 2014, 06:32
Can anybody please explain why B is wrong ?
_________________

Feel Free to Press Kudos if you like the way I think .

Intern
Joined: 06 Nov 2013
Posts: 31
Re: RAGCT Day 1: From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Sep 2014, 07:23
282252, here is the explanation i can offer.

Argument: author says that more AL than plastic is recycled. Suppose both the initial quantities are the same, the if you deduce AL, a greater reduction of AL in garbage should be seen. Now, people are definitely recycling more AL, but percentage decrease in plastic is greater.

The only way to clarify is if we were told that the initial quantity of plastic is reduced.
Therefore C is correct.

As per my evaluation, B is incorrect because it hurts the argument. If AL is recycled more than Plastic and all recycled AL is beverage container, then decline in percentage of AL containers found in garbage should be more than decline for plastic.

Its like, you are supposed to help x, but you are helping y.
_________________

'I read somewhere... how important it is in life not necessarily to be strong, but to feel strong... to measure yourself at least once.'

Intern
Joined: 03 Jun 2013
Posts: 26
Re: RAGCT Day 1: From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Sep 2014, 22:31
can we have some explaination also .

why A is wrong ?

Its a strengthen question. A qualifies as it tells that even if there is less plastic being recycled because of its weight it seems more is recycled.

Any thoughts ?
Intern
Joined: 06 Nov 2013
Posts: 31
Re: RAGCT Day 1: From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Sep 2014, 00:23
I think this question falls under : explain the discrepancy.
In these questions, you are asked to explain why Y happens regardless of X.
In the answer choices you must look for something that connects X and Y.
The answer choice A given above simply tells us that B happened because of something. Where in , all we are looking for is an explanation why Y happened despite X.
I hope this helps.
_________________

'I read somewhere... how important it is in life not necessarily to be strong, but to feel strong... to measure yourself at least once.'

Retired Moderator
Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Posts: 370
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V38
WE: Analyst (Consulting)
Re: RAGCT Day 1: From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Sep 2014, 14:01
souvik101990 wrote:
From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for a steadily decreasing percentage of the total weight of domestic garbage in the Brazil. The increasingly widespread practice of recycling aluminum and plastic was responsible for most of this decline. However, although aluminum recycling was more widely practiced in this period than plastic recycling, it was found that the weight of plastic bottles in domestic garbage declined by a greater percentage than the weight of aluminum cans.

Which of the following, if true of the Brazil in the period 2000 to 2010, most helps to account for the finding?

A. Plastic bottles are significantly heavier than aluminum cans of comparable size.

B. Recycled aluminum cans were almost all beverage containers, but a significant fraction of the recycled plastic bottles had contained products other than beverages.

C. Manufacturers replaced many plastic bottles, but few aluminum cans, with polymer containers.

D. The total weight of plastic bottles purchased by domestics increased at a slightly faster rate than the total weight of aluminum cans.

E. In many areas, plastic bottles had to be sorted by color of the plastic before being recycled, whereas aluminum cans required no sorting.

Day 1 Question of the Verbal Contest: Race Against the GMAT Club Timer

Hope this Helps

100 companies use 100 cans of Al
Garbage- 100 cans if not recycled
Now people start recycling-
Garbage- 20 cans..rest recycled....Reduction- 80%

100 companies use 100 plastics bottles as containers
Garbage- 100 cans if not recycled
Now people start recycling
Garbage- 50 cans..rest recycled....Reduction- 50% (Less than Al cans)
But Manufacturers replace the original plastic containers with polymer containers
100 companies use 20 plastics bottles as containers
Recycled- 10 container (Assuming 50% as above)
So Now,the usage is even lower, & hence lower turnout of such bottles in garbage-10 cans ...Reduction- 90%
_________________

Appreciate the efforts...KUDOS for all
Don't let an extra chromosome get you down..

Director
Joined: 03 Feb 2013
Posts: 907
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.88
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Re: RAGCT Day 1: From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Sep 2014, 09:23
if any issue in understanding this question, anybody can refer to the GMATPrep question:
from-1978-to-1988-beverage-containers-accounted-for-a-53492.html
_________________

Thanks,
Kinjal

My Application Experience : http://gmatclub.com/forum/hardwork-never-gets-unrewarded-for-ever-189267-40.html#p1516961

Re: RAGCT Day 1: From 2000 to 2010, beverage containers accounted for   [#permalink] 26 Sep 2014, 09:23

Go to page   Previous    1   2   3    Next  [ 49 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by