Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 26 May 2017, 11:26

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Ranked as one of the most important of Europes young

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

CEO
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2747
Location: New York City
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 942 [1] , given: 4

Ranked as one of the most important of Europes young [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2007, 09:38
1
KUDOS
13
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

75% (01:36) correct 25% (00:36) wrong based on 1500 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Ranked as one of the most important of Europe’s young playwrights, Franz Xaver Kroetz has written forty plays; his works—translated into over thirty languages—are produced more often than any contemporary German dramatist.
(A) than any
(B) than any other
(C) than are any
(D) than those of any other
(E) as are those of any
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 833
Followers: 89

Kudos [?]: 260 [3] , given: 61

Re: Why use of Ellipsis is not permissible here [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Mar 2013, 11:29
3
KUDOS
@piyush ask ur self what role does that word play in the sentence to which u have been asking (the word ) to get ellipsed ? "works" is a part of a subject !! right ? now ask ur self can subject of the clause be ellipsed ? the answer is no !! and hence u need "those"
CEO
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 2562
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 453 [1] , given: 0

Re: SC1000 #594 Ranked as one of the most important .... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2007, 22:26
1
KUDOS
bmwhype2 wrote:
594. Ranked as one of the most important of Europe’s young playwrights, Franz Xaver Kroetz has written forty plays; his works—translated into over thirty languages—are produced more often than any contemporary German dramatist.
(A) than any
(B) than any other
(C) than are any
(D) than those of any other
(E) as are those of any

Knocked em all out to B and D. his works are produced more often than any other... any other what?

his works are produced more often that those of any other.

Go for D.
Manager
Joined: 20 Oct 2011
Posts: 123
Concentration: Sustainability, General Management
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.98
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 31 [1] , given: 11

Re: Ranked as one of the most important of Europes young [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2011, 15:10
1
KUDOS
metallicafan wrote:
+1 D

However, I have a doubt. Does choice C have a Subject-verb agreement mistake?

C completely changes the meaning, as do A and B. All three compare the works of Kroetz with other German dramatists (not the works of other German dramatists), which is absurd.

Read it again, breaking it down slowly and you will see it.
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 3842
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Followers: 821

Kudos [?]: 6324 [1] , given: 324

Re: Why use of Ellipsis is not permissible here [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Mar 2013, 09:18
1
KUDOS
I think the scope of the word ambiguity is over-stretched here; there is absolutely no doubt or ambiguity about what is being compared. Only thing is that you are comparing two unequal or different things. So when the comparison itself is flawed, ellipsis cannot be used.
Secondly the first arm, namely, ‘his works’ is a possessive noun; the second arm also has to be in the possessive with a noun with AN apostrophe or preposition such as ‘that of’ or ‘those of’
Ellipsis will be perfectly ok with B, if we can make a small change therein.
Ranked as one of the most important of Europe’s young playwrights, Franz Xaver Kroetz has written forty plays; his works—translated into over thirty languages—are produced more often than any other contemporary German dramatist’s .
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2022
Followers: 2216

Kudos [?]: 7753 [1] , given: 291

Re: Ranked as one of the most important of Europe s young [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 May 2014, 20:40
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
akhil911 wrote:
egmat wrote:
akhil911 wrote:
Hi E-gmat team,

Can you please let us know why option B is incorrect.
As asked in the original question since the comparison is pretty clear why cant we use ellipsis here.

Dear Akhilesh,

I appreciate your question. However before I give you the answer, I would like to see your analysis. Please send me your meaning analysis and error analysis for choice A and the answer choice analysis for choice C. Also, I will give you a hint here – once you figure out what is wrong with choice A, you will be able to understand the error in choice B as well.

Regards,
Neeti.

Hi Neeti,

Apologies for replying late , i was diagnosed with chicken pox and was offline for a few days.
Here is my analysis of the question.

Ranked as one of the most important of Europe’s young playwrights, Franz Xaver Kroetz has written forty plays; his works—translated into over thirty languages—are produced more often than any contemporary German dramatist.
(A) than any
(B) than any other
(C) than are any
(D) than those of any other
(E) as are those of any

Meaning
Franz Xaver Kroetz has been ranked one of Europe's most important playwrigths.
He has written forty plays and his works
- have been translated into over thirty languages.
- and his works are produced more often than works of any other contemporary german dramatist.

Error analysis
The original sentence contains a comparison between frequency of Franz XK works with frequency of any other german dramatist.
The only error that i see here is the usage of "than any". This is incorrect as works of Franz XK also fall into this category "than any".
The sentence means to say that works of Franz XK are produced more often than works of any other german dramatist.
Here when we add any other then Franz XK is excluded from the list "any other" and the comparison makes sense.
Also works of need not be there in this sentence as it is used as an ellipsis and works and german dramatist comparison is illogical.

POE

(A) than any
- incorrect for the reasons mentioned above.
(B) than any other
- correct as per me
(C) than are any
- usage of are is incorrect
(D) than those of any other
- looks to me a wordy choice
(E) as are those of any
- usage of any is incorrect.
Makes the original mitake

Regards
Akhil

Dear Akhil,
Thank you for providing your analysis for this question and I hope you are feeling better now. 
You have done a great job in the meaning analysis. Kudos for that! I think the answer to your question is hidden in the meaning analysis itself. For ready reference, please find the same below:

Franz Xaver Kroetz has been ranked one of Europe's most important playwrigths.
He has written forty plays and his works
- have been translated into over thirty languages.
- and his works are produced more often than works of any other contemporary german dramatist.

While writing the intended comparison, you have taken care to write “than (the) works of any other contemporary German dramatist”. Clearly, you understand that logically the works of one person can be compared only with the works of another person and not to a complete other person.

Now coming to your analysis of Choice A :

The only error that i see here is the usage of "than any". This is incorrect as works of Franz XK also fall into this category "than any".
The sentence means to say that works of Franz XK are produced more often than works of any other german dramatist.
Here when we add any other then Franz XK is excluded from the list "any other" and the comparison makes sense.
Also works of need not be there in this sentence as it is used as an ellipsis and works and german dramatist comparison is illogical.

You are correct in your understanding of the meaning and the literal place where the error is in choice A but your understanding of how that error affects the meaning of choice A is not correct. First of all, Franz XK is not present in the sentence, his works are. So if anything, the comparison is between Franz XK’s works and any German dramatist (irrespective of including or excluding Franz XK as a dramatist). Accordingly, Choice A compares XK’s works with any contemporary German dramatist, saying that the works of a person are produced more often than any German dramatist. This is clearly nonsensical. A dramatist cannot be produced. Plus, as stated earlier, a dramatist can be compared with another dramatist but a dramatists’ works cannot be compared with another dramatist. They have to be compared with the works of another dramatist and no, omitting a literal reference to works is not OK. Let’s look at different versions of another sentence to understand the same. The comparison we intend to convey is that a particular person’s movies (Don Jon’s) are more successful than the movies made by any other person.
1. Don Jon’s movies are more successful than any man.
2. Don Jon’s movies are more successful than any other man.
3. Don Jon’s movies are more successful than those of any other man.
In sentences 1 and 2 above, the only ellipsis at play is the one in the verbs. So, if we were to write the two sentences without any ellipsis, they would be:

1. Don Jon’s movies are more successful than any man is (successful).
2. Don Jon’s movies are more successful than any other man is (successful).

In both the cases, we are comparing the movies of a particular person with an actual person. Where you are getting confused is that “any man” can include Don Jon whereas “any other man” cannot include Don Jon. However, that difference is of no consequence here. Don Jon is not present in the sentence. His movies are. So we are comparing his movies with actual sets of people. This makes no sense. There is no other ellipsis in the two sentences above. However, let’s take the case of sentence number 3 and get rid of the ellipsis in it:

3. Don Jon’s movies are more successful than those of any other man are (successful).

The sentence makes complete sentence with or without the ellipsis in the verb. We are comparing the movies of a person with the movies of any other person. This is because we use “those” to refer back to movies. This literal reference is a MUST.
Do you see now how choices A and B in the official question commit the same errors as sentences 1 and 2 here and how choice D is the correct choice?

Please get rid of the ellipsis in the verbs in choices A and B and present me your new analysis for them. Also, to solidify your understanding of ellipsis in comparison, please visit our in depth article on the subject here: https://e-gmat.com/blogs/?p=3577

Hope the above discussion helps!

Regards,

Neeti.
_________________

| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Affiliations: Oracle certified java programmer , adobe certified developer
Joined: 14 Jul 2013
Posts: 124
GMAT Date: 02-12-2015
GPA: 3.87
WE: Programming (Telecommunications)
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 23 [1] , given: 37

Re: Ranked as one of the most important of Europes young [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2014, 10:34
1
KUDOS
bmwhype2 wrote:
Ranked as one of the most important of Europe’s young playwrights, Franz Xaver Kroetz has written forty plays; his works—translated into over thirty languages—are produced more often than any contemporary German dramatist.
(A) than any
(B) than any other
(C) than are any
(D) than those of any other
(E) as are those of any

Straight D , 40 secs

We are comparing franz works with others
So we have to point out "those - works"
E- wrong idiom
A,B,C Out as explained above.
Still waiting for my first kudos
_________________

IF IT IS TO BE , IT IS UP TO ME

Manager
Joined: 30 Jul 2007
Posts: 158
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 19 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2007, 09:42
i say D. i think you need the "those" there to make it clear that you are comparing works between authors.
Intern
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 19
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Re: SC1000 #594 Ranked as one of the most important .... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2007, 16:39
Easy one ... D ... works of X are compared to works of Y
CEO
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2747
Location: New York City
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 942 [0], given: 4

### Show Tags

03 Aug 2007, 23:27
OA is D
Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1672
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 103

Kudos [?]: 992 [0], given: 109

Re: Ranked as one of the most important of Europes young [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2011, 14:33
+1 D

However, I have a doubt. Does choice C have a Subject-verb agreement mistake?
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1672
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Followers: 103

Kudos [?]: 992 [0], given: 109

Re: Ranked as one of the most important of Europes young [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2011, 15:47
alinomoto wrote:
metallicafan wrote:
+1 D

However, I have a doubt. Does choice C have a Subject-verb agreement mistake?

C completely changes the meaning, as do A and B. All three compare the works of Kroetz with other German dramatists (not the works of other German dramatists), which is absurd.

Read it again, breaking it down slowly and you will see it.

Thank you, but that was not my question. I understand the mistake in the sentence.
My doubt is whether there is a Subject-Verb agreement error in choice C. I think that "are" is also wrong.
What do you think?
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Joined: 20 Oct 2011
Posts: 123
Concentration: Sustainability, General Management
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.98
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 11

Re: Ranked as one of the most important of Europes young [#permalink]

### Show Tags

19 Nov 2011, 16:23
metallicafan wrote:
alinomoto wrote:
metallicafan wrote:
+1 D

However, I have a doubt. Does choice C have a Subject-verb agreement mistake?

C completely changes the meaning, as do A and B. All three compare the works of Kroetz with other German dramatists (not the works of other German dramatists), which is absurd.

Read it again, breaking it down slowly and you will see it.

Thank you, but that was not my question. I understand the mistake in the sentence.
My doubt is whether there is a Subject-Verb agreement error in choice C. I think that "are" is also wrong.
What do you think?

If you just want to boil down to S-V agreement then "are" may be fine as we are talking about "works" or may not be if we want to refer to "dramatist".

However, the S-V-A doesn't come into play here as the sentence construction is illogical and the sentence doesn't make sense. When a construction is illogical, as in A B and C, S-V agreement is pointless as the sentence in its current form just cannot exist, so obviously other errors will emanate from it. Meaning is just as important on GMAT as Grammar, infact more so. If you have 2 grammatically correct choices in your answer stem, you must look for the answer that conveys the meaning more precisely.

I don't know if I am coming across correctly. When the error is like this, SVA typically is not applicable as now your Subject or verb is wrong or misplaced in the first place.
Manager
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 200
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 71 [0], given: 5

Re: Ranked as one of the most important of Europes young [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Mar 2012, 08:31
I chose D for this question:

This is a basic comparison between Franz's works and dramatists' works. Find the answer choice that compares works to works.

A. This is an illogical comparison - compares works to dramatists

B. This is also an illogical comparison - seems to compare works to other dramatists.

C. Not parallel and illogical comparison

D. This is the correct answer - "those" can be replaced by "the works." This answer choice indeed makes sense.

E. "More" must be followed by "than" in a comparison.
Manager
Joined: 16 Sep 2011
Posts: 103
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V37
GPA: 3.28
WE: Military Officer (Military & Defense)
Followers: 9

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 72

Re: Ranked as one of the most important of Europes young [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Mar 2012, 09:05
Clear Answer D. No confusion here
_________________

If you like my post, Press +1 KUDO. It is the best way to say Thanks .

Current Student
Status: Game On !!
Joined: 02 Oct 2010
Posts: 25
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 11

Ranked as one of the most important of Europe s young [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2013, 19:37
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Ranked as one of the most important of Europe’s young playwrights, Franz Xaver Kroetz has written forty plays; his works—translated into over thirty languages—are produced more often than any contemporary German dramatist.
(A) than any
(B) than any other
(C) than are any
(D) than those of any other
(E) as are those of any

Above question is from OG 12 - # 99.

Can somebody explain, why use of ellipsis (in option B) is not permissible here? For option B, there is no ambiguity in comparision - because comparison between 'works' and German Dramatist is illogical.

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 352
Location: European union
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 41

Re: Why use of Ellipsis is not permissible here [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2013, 19:52
Option B is wrong because it compares works with authors. You need to compare works with works of other authors. Even though it might seem illogical to compare works with authors, option A does exactly that.
Current Student
Status: Game On !!
Joined: 02 Oct 2010
Posts: 25
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 11

Re: Why use of Ellipsis is not permissible here [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2013, 19:55
Ivan91 wrote:
Option B is wrong because it compares works with authors. You need to compare works with works of other authors. Even though it might seem illogical to compare works with authors, option A does exactly that.

Still, I am not clear why can't we visualize B as than (those of) any other
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Posts: 352
Location: European union
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 41

Re: Why use of Ellipsis is not permissible here [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2013, 20:03
Options A and B are in effect the same, they compare works with any (other) authors. We need to compare works with the works of any (other) author.

Than any other author and than THOSE OF any other author are completely different things. Again, "those of" changes everything.

" My books are different than any other authors" Doesnt sound good.
" My books are different than those of any other authors" Sounds good.
Current Student
Status: Game On !!
Joined: 02 Oct 2010
Posts: 25
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 11

Re: Why use of Ellipsis is not permissible here [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Mar 2013, 20:21
Ivan91 wrote:
Options A and B are in effect the same, they compare works with any (other) authors. We need to compare works with the works of any (other) author.

Than any other author and than THOSE OF any other author are completely different things. Again, "those of" changes everything.

" My books are different than any other authors" Doesnt sound good.
" My books are different than those of any other authors" Sounds good.

Hi Ivan, thanks for the explanation..i do understand that 'D' makes sense because it compares works with works, But my question is Why ellipsis can not be used here? ..I am asking this question with reference to the recently published article by e-gmat...as per that article ellipsis can be used when there is no ambiguity in comparison..
Re: Why use of Ellipsis is not permissible here   [#permalink] 09 Mar 2013, 20:21

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 35 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
One of the most important decisions for most people experiencing 2 19 Feb 2017, 12:41
26 The Roman Empire expanded to most of southern Europe 18 09 May 2017, 05:57
5 Imported into Massachusetts from Europe in 1869 6 27 Jul 2016, 22:29
Ranked as one of the most important of Europe s young 0 11 Sep 2016, 06:50
15 Imported into Massachusetts from Europe in 1869, the gypsy 16 27 Jul 2016, 22:32
Display posts from previous: Sort by