AshutoshB
I dont understand how B is the answer
First, let's look at Raphaela's argument:
- Forcing people to help others is morally wrong.
- According to Raphaela, redistributing resources via taxation is an example of forcing people to help others (i.e. if you are forced to pay taxes and some of your tax money goes towards helping people, then you are effectively being forced to help others).
- Since forcing people to help others is morally wrong, redistributing resources via taxation is morally wrong.
- Thus, no government has the right to redistribute resources via taxation.
According to Edward, governments aren't really FORCING anyone to pay taxes. If people don't want to help others with tax money, they can simply leave the country. In other words, people can decide whether they want to live in a country whose government redistributes resources via taxation.
So according to Edward, as long as government allows its people to leave, then the government essentially allows its people to choose whether they want to help others via taxes. However, if a government does NOT allow its people to leave, then Edward would agree that such a government is not allowing its people to choose whether they want to help others via taxes.
To summarize:
Raphaela: Any government that taxes its people is forcing its people to help others.
Edwards: Any government that taxes its people AND prevents its people from leaving is forcing its people to help others.
Edwards: Any government that taxes its people but does NOT prevent its people from leaving is NOT forcing its people to help others.
So Raphaela and Edwards would agree about a government that taxes its people AND prevents its people from leaving. But they would disagree about a government that taxes its people but ALLOWS its people to leave (i.e. allows its people to emigrate). This is consistent with choice (B).