Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 28 May 2017, 09:41

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Rate my AOI, if you like

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Mar 2011
Posts: 284
Concentration: Finance
Schools: UCLA (Anderson) - Class of 2014
Followers: 21

Kudos [?]: 87 [0], given: 12

Rate my AOI, if you like [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Jun 2011, 13:16
Princeton Review scored this as a 2. I wasn't necessarily expecting a 6, but the examples of a 2 I have seen are far inferior to this, in my opinion. Let me know what you think!

Prompt: “Since most people would rather talk than listen, there will always be miscommunication.”

My essay:

Effective communication is essential to social, economic, familial, and political success in today's world. Every person has an opinion, and it is natural for one to believe that one's perspective is correct almost all of the time. One desires to sway others towards one's own point of view. The issue presented is controversial, but a closer examination reveals that it is perhaps overly broad.
The statement assumes that peoples' desire to talk rather than listen causes people to ignore each other and focus more on one way conversation than on a balanced, two-way exchange of ideas. For example: it is not uncommon to sit around an ordinary family dinner table and argue, converse, and talk rationally with friends and family. Although most participants certainly desire to get their views out in the open, it is folly to assume that there is automatically an inherent miscommunication that takes place. Miscommunication implies that the idea being expressed by one party is misunderstood or misinterpreted by the receiving party. This simply is not always the case, even in instances where two individuals clearly would rather talk to each other, argue, or even verbally spar, than listen to each other.
To illustrate this point, one needs only to examine a political debate. Two candidates, often with extremely polar opposite opinions on social, economic, and military issues, come together and spend hours talking past each other. One candidate states a position on an issue; the other proceeds to immediately punch holes in the first's argument. Granted, occasionally the candidates might misunderstand each other, but more often than not, they know exactly what their opponent is communicating and seek to tear the argument to pieces in front of the audience. There are few people in the world who would rather talk more than politicians, and when they go against each other one on one, they do not always miscommunicate. Sometimes this might be true, but to say that it always will happen is just too extreme of a statement.
Perhaps that is the best reason that this statement is simply invalid. Although there is a measure of truth in its words, the nature of its meaning is just too extreme to have merit. Saying something is always true implies that there is no possibility for any other outcome. There is a logical gap that exists between the premise, "most people would rather talk than listen," and the conclusion, "there will always be miscommunication." Without some solid evidence and an expressed rationalization for why this must be the case, the argument cannot be upheld as strong.
In summary, while the argument might sometimes be true, it is clear that it is far from accurate one hundred percent of the time. Certainly there could be a time when two people believe in their opinions so strongly that they simply could never understand or communicate effectively with each other. However, this is rare when compared with the average conversation and exchange between individuals on a day to day basis. Most people are able to at least understand what their friend or opponent is trying to communicate, whether the opinion is agreeable or not. Hence, it is better to take a more moderate approach than the one expressed in the statement. Were it to read "sometimes there will be miscommunication," it would be extremely accurate.
Intern
Status: App Time
Joined: 30 Nov 2010
Posts: 40
Location: United States (PA)
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Re: Rate my AOI, if you like [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Jun 2011, 11:51
I read through your essay and I don't see it as a 2 by any means. I would rate this very high on the scale. The only issue I can think of would be a lack of explicit agreement or disagreement with the issue. I understand that you are against the issue presented but maybe the Princeton Review was expecting something more profound in terms of your stand. It is possible that they do not expect you to "attack" the issue as you do but simply agree or disagree with it, but that's just my guess.

-t
_________________

My GMAT Story: tale-of-a-first-timer

Re: Rate my AOI, if you like   [#permalink] 14 Jun 2011, 11:51
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
got GMAT tomorrow - please rate my AOI as well 4 15 Feb 2012, 00:53
1 Please rate my AOI! 3 03 Jun 2011, 20:25
rate my essay AOI 0 13 May 2011, 08:38
rate my essay AOI 0 13 May 2011, 08:37
Experts: Please rate AOI 1 08 Oct 2010, 01:55
Display posts from previous: Sort by