Last visit was: 25 Apr 2024, 10:58 It is currently 25 Apr 2024, 10:58

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 23 Oct 2013
Posts: 66
Own Kudos [?]: 29 [0]
Given Kudos: 35
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 680 Q46 V36
GPA: 3.95
WE:Research (Telecommunications)
Send PM
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Posts: 4946
Own Kudos [?]: 7626 [1]
Given Kudos: 215
Location: India
Send PM
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 May 2021
Posts: 12
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 270
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, Economics
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V34
GPA: 3.94
Send PM
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13960
Own Kudos [?]: 32911 [0]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: A recent survey commissioned by the market research department of XY [#permalink]
Expert Reply
AWA Score: 5 - 5.5 out of 6

I have used a GMAT AWA auto-grader to evaluate your essay.

Coherence and connectivity: 5/5
This rating corresponds to the flow of ideas and expressions from one paragraph to another. The effective use of connectives and coherence of assertive language in arguing for/against the argument is analyzed. This is deemed as one of the most important parameters.

Paragraph structure and formation: 4.5/5
The structure and division of the attempt into appropriate paragraphs are evaluated. To score well on this parameter, it is important to organize the attempt into paragraphs. Preferable to follow the convention of leaving a line blank at the end of each paragraph, to make the software aware of the structure of the essay.

Vocabulary and word expression: 4.5/5
This parameter rates the submitted essay on the range of relevant vocabulary possessed by the candidate basis the word and expression usage. There are no extra- points for bombastic word usage. Simple is the best form of suave!


Good Luck

pyroabhi wrote:
The market research report states that there the consumers of the brand recognise the brand and the apparel sold in the XY Gen stores. However, among the non consumers, while 60% recognised the name of the brand, they did not become a consumer. On the basis of this research, it is concluded that a rebranding and marketing campaign should be launched to change the company's image and make the non consumers as consumers.

the argument rests on an assumption that among the non consumers, 40% who dont recognise the brand will become consumers if re branding and marketing is done. Moreover, the remaining 60 %, who already recognise the brand will become its customers as a result of the proposed plan. However, it is nowhere mentioned as to why the second group( the 60% group) do not buy from the store despite recognising the brand. For example- it may be a matter of their personal preference or they may not like the quality/color etc of the brand. If this is indeed the reason, then mere re branding or marketing will be of little help.

Therefore, the argument can be more reasoned if we have more information on how to convert our non consumers to consumers Moreover, it appears that it will be more reasonable to convert the 60%, who are already aware of the brand but are non consumers, to consumers than it will be for the rest 40%. The marketing strategy for the later group must focus on first making them aware of the brand and then turning them into consumers.

Clearly, without the mentioned details, it becomes difficult to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed plan
Intern
Intern
Joined: 08 Jul 2019
Posts: 3
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 15
Send PM
Re: A recent survey commissioned by the market research department of XY [#permalink]
Afore-mentioned argument recommends a plan that XY Gen Stores executives should launch a significant rebranding and marketing campaign to change the company's image and thereby bring new consumers into the stores. This recommendation in the argument is being backed up by the results of a recent market research survey that there is a high level of recognition among consumers of the brand and the nature of the apparel sold in XY Gen Stores. However, the argument also states that the survey also indicated that approximately 60% of those surveyed that recognized the name of XY Gen Stores had never shopped at one of the company's stores. At the first glance, the argument looks convincing, but at further analysis of the argument and its underlying structure a lot of gaps comes into our notice. The argument is filled up with feeble evidence, overreaching assumptions and weak evidences.

Firstly, the argument commits a fallacy in stating that a high level of recognition is there among customers. The author here has missed to state the reason that the customer recognises the brand with. For example, the customer might recognise the brand as a premium brand or a brand targeted towards children. Rebranding which might again focus on the group already recognising the brand.

Secondly, the 60% of the people who recognise the brand might not be shopping at the store but might be shopping the same online. Also, the in store shopping might be out of the pocket reach of the customers which might be the reason the customer might not be shopping in the store. Also, the competition brand might have a better pricing and sale offers. Instead of changing the marketing campaigns the company should look to solve the other reasons behind the problem. Had the author taken these points into consideration, the argument would have been much stronger.

Moreover, the argument assumes that launching the market campaigns will bring new customers in the store. However, the author has not mentioned they will shop as well at the store, mentioning which will remove a gap that appears in the argument. Also, it has taken into account that rebranding will be of benefit which cannot be assumed here.

Concludingly, the argument as is, consists of numerous gaps, most evident of which have been discussed above. Had the author of the argument acknowledged and taken the defects of the argument into consideration and mentioned those in the argument, the argument would have been without any gaps and would not have fallen apart. However, the argument, as is, one must conclude that it is full of weak assumptions and baseless evidences.
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Posts: 13960
Own Kudos [?]: 32911 [0]
Given Kudos: 5778
GPA: 3.62
Send PM
Re: A recent survey commissioned by the market research department of XY [#permalink]
Expert Reply
AWA Score: 5 out of 6

Coherence and connectivity: 5/5
This rating corresponds to the flow of ideas and expressions from one paragraph to another. The effective use of connectives and coherence of assertive language in arguing for/against the argument is analyzed. This is deemed as one of the most important parameters.

Paragraph structure and formation: 3.5/5
The structure and division of the attempt into appropriate paragraphs are evaluated. To score well on this parameter, it is important to organize the attempt into paragraphs. Preferable to follow the convention of leaving a line blank at the end of each paragraph, to make the software aware of the structure of the essay.

Vocabulary and word expression: 4/5
This parameter rates the submitted essay on the range of relevant vocabulary possessed by the candidate basis the word and expression usage. There are no extra- points for bombastic word usage. Simple is the best form of suave!


Good Luck

stuti1614 wrote:
Afore-mentioned argument recommends a plan that XY Gen Stores executives should launch a significant rebranding and marketing campaign to change the company's image and thereby bring new consumers into the stores. This recommendation in the argument is being backed up by the results of a recent market research survey that there is a high level of recognition among consumers of the brand and the nature of the apparel sold in XY Gen Stores. However, the argument also states that the survey also indicated that approximately 60% of those surveyed that recognized the name of XY Gen Stores had never shopped at one of the company's stores. At the first glance, the argument looks convincing, but at further analysis of the argument and its underlying structure a lot of gaps comes into our notice. The argument is filled up with feeble evidence, overreaching assumptions and weak evidences.

Firstly, the argument commits a fallacy in stating that a high level of recognition is there among customers. The author here has missed to state the reason that the customer recognises the brand with. For example, the customer might recognise the brand as a premium brand or a brand targeted towards children. Rebranding which might again focus on the group already recognising the brand.

Secondly, the 60% of the people who recognise the brand might not be shopping at the store but might be shopping the same online. Also, the in store shopping might be out of the pocket reach of the customers which might be the reason the customer might not be shopping in the store. Also, the competition brand might have a better pricing and sale offers. Instead of changing the marketing campaigns the company should look to solve the other reasons behind the problem. Had the author taken these points into consideration, the argument would have been much stronger.

Moreover, the argument assumes that launching the market campaigns will bring new customers in the store. However, the author has not mentioned they will shop as well at the store, mentioning which will remove a gap that appears in the argument. Also, it has taken into account that rebranding will be of benefit which cannot be assumed here.

Concludingly, the argument as is, consists of numerous gaps, most evident of which have been discussed above. Had the author of the argument acknowledged and taken the defects of the argument into consideration and mentioned those in the argument, the argument would have been without any gaps and would not have fallen apart. However, the argument, as is, one must conclude that it is full of weak assumptions and baseless evidences.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: A recent survey commissioned by the market research department of XY [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6921 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne