It is currently 22 Nov 2017, 17:27

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Recent studies show that even after expensive measures have

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 03 Jul 2005
Posts: 9

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Recent studies show that even after expensive measures have [#permalink]

Show Tags

14 Aug 2005, 21:15
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:40) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 22 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Recent studies show that even after expensive measures have been taken to decrease the amount of pollutants in a lake, the pollution level of the water remains high. For this reason, many senators are skeptical about whether certain pollution control measures are worth their tremendous cost.

Which of the following,if true,casts the most serious doubt on the senator's reasoning ?

a) For a lake to recover from serious pollution, not only must measures be taken to decrease pollutants but also enough time must be allowed for these measures to work.

b) Environmentalists claim that the sources of pollution that are being eleminated are but a small fraction of the causes of the pollution

c) The level of animal life in a lake remains constant throughout the implementation of pollution control measures.

d) Scientists say that the tools to facilitate more thorough lake clean-ups are now being perfected

e) Cleaning up bodes of water, inlcuding lakes, rivers, and oceans, is a critical part of a senators responsibility.

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 05 Apr 2005
Posts: 1705

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

14 Aug 2005, 21:37
a) For a lake to recover from serious pollution, not only must measures be taken to decrease pollutants but also enough time must be allowed for these measures to work.

Kudos [?]: 98 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 19 Jul 2005
Posts: 54

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Show Tags

15 Aug 2005, 02:17
It's A

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 28 Jun 2005
Posts: 211

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

15 Aug 2005, 05:54

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 03 Jul 2005
Posts: 9

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

16 Aug 2005, 05:09
Yes the OA is 'A'

But i have question here.

But first this is my analysis of the question :
The conclusion here is : Senators doubt the effectiveness of the pollution control measures
Evidence : The expensive measures havent decreased the amount of pollutants.
Assumption : The right measures have been taken and have been implemented correctly.

So if we are able to suggest that : the right measures have not been taken ( the right causes are not being eleminated , as in choice B ). Isnt it enough to weaken the conclusion ?
PR says the stimulus doesnt mention anything about the causes of pollution, and hence choice B is wrong. But I am not able to convince myself about this, because the choice clearly mentions an alternative explanation for the failure of the measures .

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 10 Aug 2013
Posts: 16

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 2

Location: United States

Show Tags

24 Oct 2013, 21:03
karthikmeda wrote:
Yes the OA is 'A'

But i have question here.

But first this is my analysis of the question :
The conclusion here is : Senators doubt the effectiveness of the pollution control measures
Evidence : The expensive measures havent decreased the amount of pollutants.
Assumption : The right measures have been taken and have been implemented correctly.

So if we are able to suggest that : the right measures have not been taken ( the right causes are not being eleminated , as in choice B ). Isnt it enough to weaken the conclusion ?
PR says the stimulus doesnt mention anything about the causes of pollution, and hence choice B is wrong. But I am not able to convince myself about this, because the choice clearly mentions an alternative explanation for the failure of the measures .

I have same doubt as you,why can't we have B as option?

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 2

Re:   [#permalink] 24 Oct 2013, 21:03
Display posts from previous: Sort by