It is currently 21 Sep 2017, 19:51

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Recently, some critics of the U.S. government have pointed

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Nov 2006
Posts: 258

Kudos [?]: 240 [0], given: 0

Location: California
Recently, some critics of the U.S. government have pointed [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Jun 2007, 19:14
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Recently, some critics of the U.S. government have pointed out that this country is the only advanced industrialized nation without a national vaccine laboratory and suggested that this lack makes the American public more vulnerable than other developed nations to infectious diseases, such as avian flu. A government official said these critics were disloyal and thus wrong about the public’s vulnerability. To support his claim, the official cited the generally long life span and low infant mortality of United States citizens, relative to all United Nation member nations. Mentioning the high quality of American hospitals, he added that all of the Europeans that he knew preferred to undergo major medical treatments in the United States rather than in the socialized medical systems in place in their home countries.

All of the following are weaknesses or potential weaknesses in the official’s argument EXCEPT:


The high quality of hospitals in the United States is not a factor affecting the public’s vulnerability to infectious disease.

Whether or not the critics are disloyal has no bearing on whether or not they are wrong.

The Europeans that the official cited are a demographically narrow sample, overwhelmingly composed of wealthy males over the age of fifty.

The average life span of United States citizens is determined not only by deaths due to infectious diseases but also by deaths due to all other causes.

Comparing the United States to all United Nations member nations does not address the concern that the U.S. is behind other advanced industrialized nations in a particular way.

Kudos [?]: 240 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2007
Posts: 376

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jun 2007, 12:36
D looks the least weak here

Kudos [?]: 15 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 365

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jun 2007, 13:38
D because it actually strengthens the officials claim by indicating that US citizens can die because of other causes besides infectious diseases

Kudos [?]: 97 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 639

Kudos [?]: 621 [0], given: 6

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jun 2007, 14:20
Can we directly consider on "The average life span of United States citizens"? Because passage never implies that.

I guess it should be E, which directly negates the chance of comparison. Hence strengthen the officials' in other way.

Kudos [?]: 621 [0], given: 6

GMAT Instructor
avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2006
Posts: 1259

Kudos [?]: 328 [0], given: 0

Location: Madrid
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jun 2007, 15:35
C The representativeness of the wealthy male Europeans is irrelevant

Kudos [?]: 328 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2006
Posts: 702

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jun 2007, 17:27
priyankur_saha@ml.com wrote:
Can we directly consider on "The average life span of United States citizens"? Because passage never implies that.

I guess it should be E, which directly negates the chance of comparison. Hence strengthen the officials' in other way.




Agree E

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Apr 2007
Posts: 166

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jun 2007, 18:47
D here.

I was between C and D too...

But D does indeed strengthen the argument by saying that there are multiple causes of death, yet the death rate is still low, according to the official.

C should remind you of the classic statistics CR question...the official only cites "a few people he knows," so this is definitely not representative of the European community. The fact that they are all old wealthy people means taht they have the money and ability to go to the US for treatment, whereas most people don't have that luxury.

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 15 Jul 2004
Posts: 1441

Kudos [?]: 214 [0], given: 13

Schools: Wharton (R2 - submitted); HBS (R2 - submitted); IIMA (admitted for 1 year PGPX)
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jul 2007, 08:09
I'd go with C because it's irrelevant to the argument. The fact that a few wealthy Europeans get treated in the US has no bearing on the incapability of US in having an infectious disease program.

Do we have the OA at all?

Kudos [?]: 214 [0], given: 13

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jul 2007
Posts: 288

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Location: The 408
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jul 2007, 08:55
D for me.

if the average life span is still higher after factoring car accidents, teen violence, etc. that makes the case stronger.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 11 Jun 2007
Posts: 910

Kudos [?]: 269 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Jul 2007, 11:32
another D from me.. it strengthens the argument. I feel is a stronger answer than C even though it is irrelevant

Kudos [?]: 269 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 31 Mar 2007
Posts: 574

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 0

Location: Canada eh
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jul 2007, 02:48
This one was tough..... D.
Any good explanations? I'm still iffy... I got it down to D/E

Kudos [?]: 77 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 855

Kudos [?]: 472 [0], given: 7

Re: CR: Recently, some critics of the U.S. government [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2007, 04:17
Recently, some critics of the U.S. government have pointed out that this country is the only advanced industrialized nation without a national vaccine laboratory and suggested that this lack makes the American public more vulnerable than other developed nations to infectious diseases, such as avian flu. A government official said these critics were disloyal and thus wrong about the public’s vulnerability. To support his claim, the official cited the generally long life span and low infant mortality of United States citizens, relative to all United Nation member nations. Mentioning the high quality of American hospitals, he added that all of the Europeans that he knew preferred to undergo major medical treatments in the United States rather than in the socialized medical systems in place in their home countries.

The highlighted bit is an officials argument. The argument is quite weak and our task is to show (exclude) its weaknesses and loopholes.
As the debate is between C and D, let's see them:


All of the following are weaknesses or potential weaknesses in the official’s argument EXCEPT:

(C) The Europeans that the official cited are a demographically narrow sample, overwhelmingly composed of wealthy males over the age of fifty.
it is a neutral statement
(D) The average life span of United States citizens is determined not only by deaths due to infectious diseases but also by deaths due to all other causes.
This is showing the argument's weakness and cannot be a correct answer. The official is supporting his argument by stating "the generally long life span". How can it be relevant, if the official is opposing to the idea of "vulnerability of the nation to infectious diseases"? Only if "long life span" is due to "infectious diseases". D says that that is not the case.

Can we have OA, please?

Kudos [?]: 472 [0], given: 7

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Aug 2006
Posts: 95

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2007, 07:05
I think it is A. Others are clearly factors that weakens the argument. This one doesn't really.. may be there is some other reason that makes US citizens vulnerable but not the poor hospitals.
_________________

http://gmatstuff.blogspot.com

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 29 Jul 2006
Posts: 853

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2007, 10:48
I think its D...C weakens the argument by saying the Europeans that visited were not a representative sample of people.

Kudos [?]: 139 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 200

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Re: CR: Recently, some critics of the U.S. government [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2007, 10:57
mm007 wrote:
Recently, some critics of the U.S. government have pointed out that this country is the only advanced industrialized nation without a national vaccine laboratory and suggested that this lack makes the American public more vulnerable than other developed nations to infectious diseases, such as avian flu. A government official said these critics were disloyal and thus wrong about the public’s vulnerability. To support his claim, the official cited the generally long life span and low infant mortality of United States citizens, relative to all United Nation member nations. Mentioning the high quality of American hospitals, he added that all of the Europeans that he knew preferred to undergo major medical treatments in the United States rather than in the socialized medical systems in place in their home countries.

All of the following are weaknesses or potential weaknesses in the official’s argument EXCEPT:


The high quality of hospitals in the United States is not a factor affecting the public’s vulnerability to infectious disease.

Whether or not the critics are disloyal has no bearing on whether or not they are wrong.

The Europeans that the official cited are a demographically narrow sample, overwhelmingly composed of wealthy males over the age of fifty.

The average life span of United States citizens is determined not only by deaths due to infectious diseases but also by deaths due to all other causes.

Comparing the United States to all United Nations member nations does not address the concern that the U.S. is behind other advanced industrialized nations in a particular way.


I think C.

The question asks for weaknesses or potential weaknesses in the official's argument.

A. Yes, quality of hospitals is not a factor to public vulnerability to infectious diseases.
B. Yes, critics' loyalty is irrelevant.
C. My logic here is that if the wealthy europeans want to use American hospitals then wouldn't other less-wealthy europeans want to too? They sure would even if they are not wealthy so this is not a weakness.
D. Yes, this choice points out that average life span cited is not only for infectious diseases. So citing the average life span is weakness.
E. Yes, this choice points out the weakness in the argument that all U.N. nations are not representative of advanced industrialized nations.

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2004
Posts: 47

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Aug 2007, 11:28
confused here...all others weaken except A...but then A probably looks unrelated

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 200

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2007, 02:28
What's OA?

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 29 Dec 2004
Posts: 47

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Aug 2007, 08:30
If I remember correctly, OA is D (I did this question sometime back). However there was no explanation there

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Posts: 272

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Aug 2007, 17:32
oh boy what a CR

Took me 3-4 min to get down on this.

I will go with D. what is OA
_________________

AimHigher

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 26 Aug 2007, 17:32
    Similar topics Author Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
2 Governments have only one response to public criticism of gmatcracker2010 14 15 Aug 2011, 12:57
EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC #Top150 CR - Recently some critics of the U.S. government souvik101990 0 03 Apr 2016, 13:54
Recently, some critics of the U.S. government harvardgirl1 0 31 Jan 2017, 07:59
EXPERTS_POSTS_IN_THIS_TOPIC CR Revision: Recently some critics of the U.S. government have souvik101990 0 06 Apr 2016, 09:25
Recently, some critics of the U.S. government have pointed x97agarwal 0 26 Aug 2016, 05:21
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Recently, some critics of the U.S. government have pointed

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


cron

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.