It is currently 23 Oct 2017, 10:51

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the

Author Message
Director
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 794

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore
Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Nov 2005, 05:37
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the environment. This is because the more slowly a car is driven, the more time it spends on the road spewing exhaust into the air and running the risk of colliding with other vehicles.

The argumentâ€™s reasoning is flawed because the argument

(A) neglects the fact that some motorists completely ignore speed limits.
(B) Ignore the possibility of benefits from lowering speed limits other than environmental and safety benefits.
(C) Fails to consider that if speed limits are reduced, increased driving times will increase the number of cars on the road at any given time.
(D) Presumes, without providing justification, that total emissions for a given automobile trip are determined primarily by the amount of time the trip takes
(E) Presumes, without providing justification, that drivers run a significant risk of collision only if they spend a lot of time on the road.
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 30 Sep 2004
Posts: 1480

Kudos [?]: 412 [0], given: 0

Location: Germany

### Show Tags

14 Nov 2005, 06:14
D)...

conclusion: Reducing speed limits neither saves lives nor protects the environment.

evidence: This is because the more slowly a car is driven, the more time it spends on the road spewing exhaust into the air and running the risk of colliding with other vehicles.

assumption: if a car is driven more slowly then more exhaust is in the air and the risk of collision is higher. this is a cause-effect-relation.

flaw: no justification for this relation. maybe the exhaust is primarliy cause by the starting of the car.
_________________

If your mind can conceive it and your heart can believe it, have faith that you can achieve it.

Kudos [?]: 412 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 24 Sep 2005
Posts: 1884

Kudos [?]: 379 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

14 Nov 2005, 06:24
christoph's explanation is too sufficient to elaborate anything more .Agree that it's D.

Kudos [?]: 379 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 498

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

15 Nov 2005, 00:57
D it is.

Kudos [?]: 14 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 28 May 2005
Posts: 1700

Kudos [?]: 474 [0], given: 0

Location: Dhaka

### Show Tags

15 Nov 2005, 12:26
yup D it is.
_________________

hey ya......

Kudos [?]: 474 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 794

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

15 Nov 2005, 15:29
Nicely explained Chris. OA is D!
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

15 Nov 2005, 15:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by