Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 29 May 2017, 14:51

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# request to rate my awa

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
Intern
Joined: 01 Dec 2013
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 3

request to rate my awa [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Mar 2014, 15:35
hey, can you please rate my essay. i will appriciate all your comments

When the Apogee Company had all its operations in one location, it was more profitable than it is today. Therefore,
the Apogee Company should close down its field offices and conduct all its operations from a single location. Such
centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and helping the company maintain better supervision of all
employees.”

The argument claims that Apogee Company was more profitable then today when it had all its operations in one location. Author is saying that the company should close down its field offices and conduct all its operations from a single location so such centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and helping the company maintain better supervision of all employees. Stated in this way the argument fails to mention several key factors, on the baisis of which it could be evaluated. The conclusion relies on assumptions, for which is no clear evidence. Therefore, the argument is rather weak, unconvincing and has several flaws.

First, the argument readily assumes that because of all operations in one location company would be more profitable. This statement is stretch and not sustained in any way. Nowadays more and more companies are going global. With globalization people will recognize the company, their products, their benefits and make company will make more money. So if company will close down its field offices they will not know their costumers and they will not know what to offer them. This is a privilege of office in other location and employees can more efficiently deal with costumers from there.

Second, the argument claims that the company should close down its field offices and conduct all its operations from a single location. The author believe that such a centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and helping the company maintain better supervision of all employees. Again this sentence is very weak and unsupported claim. Different people - different ideas - profit. For example if the company is making products, people get bored, and employees are soon out of ideas. In one location is not huge variarety. So with different locations employers would encourage employees ideas and company will make good profit out of it.

In conclusion, the argument is flawed for the above mentioned reasons and is therefore unconvincing. It could be considerably strengthened if the author clearly mentioned all the relevant facts. In order to assess the merits of a certain situation it is essential to have full knowledge of all contributing factors.
Director
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Posts: 502
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
Followers: 93

Kudos [?]: 463 [1] , given: 6

Re: request to rate my awa [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2014, 03:53
1
KUDOS
Hello Marijana;
In my opinion your response should get a 4 - 5 out of 6.
While your response was well written, there are a few things that you could do to make it more targeted towards responding to the task.

Let me discuss the biggest issues observed in the given argument.

1. Author assumes that the loss in profitability in the company was because of decentralisation
2. Author also assumes that centralising will not bring about any negative consequences to the company.

You need to focus on these questionable assumptions when discussing the flaws in the argument.
You have done this, yet you have not really shown HOW these assumptions make the argument weak: what could be the implication if they were proved wrong.

Let me show you:

First, the argument readily assumes that because of all operations in one location company would be more profitable.ideally start by discussing the assumption, here a more exact representation of the assumption would be that "the author assumes that the dip in profits was due to decentralisation" This statement is stretch and not sustained in any way. Nowadays more and more companies are going global. With globalization people will recognize the company, their products, their benefits and make company will make more money. So if company will close down its field offices they will not know their costumers and they will not know what to offer them. The problem here is that you've detracted from the assumption; focus on the assumption and show what flaws exist in this assumption (the causal flaw); show how this weakens the argument.This is a privilege of office in other location and employees can more efficiently deal with costumers from there.

Second, the argument claims that the company should close down its field offices and conduct all its operations from a single location. The author believe that such a centralization would improve profitability by cutting costs and helping the company maintain better supervision of all employees. Again this sentence is very weak and unsupported claim. Different people - different ideas - profit. For example if the company is making products, people get bored, and employees are soon out of ideas. In one location is not huge variarety. So with different locations employers would encourage employees ideas and company will make good profit out of it.

Again, a better approach for the second body paragraph could have been to discuss the potential negative consequence (harm/benefit) of the suggested plan to centralise.

To summarize:
In your body paragraphs you need to discuss the biggest flaws in the argument by
1. Stating the questionable assumption
2. Elaborate the weaknesses of the assumption
3. Show how this weakness the argument as a whole
4. If needed suggests ways in which this weakness could be amended.

Follow this and you should be able to score consistent near perfect scores!

Cheers,
Peo
Verbal Trainer - Crackverbal
_________________

Enroll for our GMAT Trial Course here -
http://gmatonline.crackverbal.com/

Learn all PS and DS strategies here-
http://gmatonline.crackverbal.com/p/mastering-quant-on-gmat

Intern
Joined: 01 Dec 2013
Posts: 4
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 0 [0], given: 3

Re: request to rate my awa [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Mar 2014, 15:42
hey Peo, thank you for your effort. I will follow your advices and score perfect scores
Re: request to rate my awa   [#permalink] 05 Mar 2014, 15:42
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
[Request] Kindly rate my AWA 1 25 Nov 2016, 02:47
1 Request to rate my AWA 1 12 Mar 2014, 11:52
1 Request to rate my AWA 6 11 Mar 2014, 13:05
1 Request to rate my AWA 10 10 May 2015, 20:13
Request experts to rate my awa please 1 05 Sep 2013, 04:15
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# request to rate my awa

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.