It is currently 21 Oct 2017, 09:07

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Research during the past several decades on the nature of

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 98

Kudos [?]: 78 [1], given: 0

Location: USA

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2004, 16:35
1
KUDOS
51
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

38% (01:21) correct 62% (01:32) wrong based on 2143 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Research during the past several decades on the nature of language and the processes that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity.

(A) that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity
(B) of producing and understanding it have revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity
(C) by which it is produced and understood has revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity
(D) by which it is produced and understood have revealed great complexity rather than underlying simplicity
(E) by which one produces and understands it have revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 78 [1], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4285

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

Re: Research during the past several decades on the nature of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Jul 2004, 19:40
C is best
in A: Processes that produce language seems illogical to me and changes the meaning of the sentence. It is as if the processes were producing language.
C is better in saying that processes are a means by which language is produced.
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Kudos [?]: 528 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 11 May 2004
Posts: 327

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

Re: Research during the past several decades on the nature of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2004, 01:42
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
singh_satya wrote:
Research during the past several decades on the nature of language and the processes that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity.
(A) that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity
(B) of producing and understanding it have revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity
(C) by which it is produced and understood has revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity
(D) by which it is produced and understood have revealed great complexity rather than underlying simplicity
(E) by which one produces and understands it have revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity

A or C.
Explain plz
Thanks
Satya

sorry ..

my choice :D 50 seconds

processes <by which it is produced and understood > + have should come. Not "HAS"

(A) that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity

in this choice "it" is not correct in pronoun number as noun x and y. it should be them. however meaning also not correct

(B) of producing and understanding it have revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity

in this choice "it" is not correct in pronoun number

(C) by which it is produced and understood has revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity

singular verb "has" not matching with plural subject processes

(E) by which one produces and understands it have revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity

awkward.

Kudos [?]: 24 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1603

Kudos [?]: 303 [2], given: 0

Re: Research during the past several decades on the nature of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2004, 02:11
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
syamee_u wrote:
singh_satya wrote:
Research during the past several decades on the nature of language and the processes that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity.
(A) that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity
(B) of producing and understanding it have revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity
(C) by which it is produced and understood has revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity
(D) by which it is produced and understood have revealed great complexity rather than underlying simplicity
(E) by which one produces and understands it have revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity

A or C.
Explain plz
Thanks
Satya

sorry ..

my choice :D 50 seconds

processes <by which it is produced and understood > + have should come. Not "HAS"

(A) that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity

in this choice "it" is not correct in pronoun number as noun x and y. it should be them. however meaning also not correct

(B) of producing and understanding it have revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity

in this choice "it" is not correct in pronoun number

(C) by which it is produced and understood has revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity

singular verb "has" not matching with plural subject processes

(E) by which one produces and understands it have revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity

awkward.

The subject here is RESEARCH (a singular). Therefore, we need verb HAS, which is in A and C. The other options are out.

Between A and C, I, however, opt for A.
"processes by which it is ... understood" does not seem to be as clear as "processes that produce and make it understandable "

Kudos [?]: 303 [2], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 217

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Re: Research during the past several decades on the nature of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2004, 02:46
I'll go for C
I don't like A because
1) instead of "processes that produce and make it understandable" it is better "processes that produce IT and make IT understandable"
2) even then I still doubt that processes can produce anything

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jan 2004
Posts: 400

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: India
Re: Research during the past several decades on the nature of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2004, 04:58
IMO (C) is best.

I didn't like the second part of (A) --> "great complexity instead of underlying simplicity".
The corresponding part in (C) is better. "has revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity"

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 20 May 2004
Posts: 98

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 0

Location: USA
Re: Research during the past several decades on the nature of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2004, 12:38
OAis A

Kudos [?]: 78 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2004
Posts: 445

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 0

Location: Cary,NC
Re: Research during the past several decades on the nature of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2004, 12:48
A says "processes that produce and make it understandable has revealed"

I'm confused here.

Is it the "research" that has revealed great complexity OR
the "processes" that have revealed great complexity ?

I believe the "that" after processes is close to the action reveal and makes A sound faulty.
A should have "have" instead of "has".
_________________

ash
________________________
I'm crossing the bridge.........

Kudos [?]: 76 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 16 Oct 2003
Posts: 1798

Kudos [?]: 170 [1], given: 0

Re: Research during the past several decades on the nature of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Jul 2004, 13:08
1
KUDOS
Got it A,

In C, Research ...........has revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity. I think it should be has not revealed .......

Kudos [?]: 170 [1], given: 0

VP
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1207

Kudos [?]: 822 [0], given: 0

Location: Taiwan
Re: Research during the past several decades on the nature of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2005, 05:52
Bhai wrote:
Got it A,

In C, Research ...........has revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity. I think it should be has not revealed .......

Hello, Bhai, I think you are a little misunderstood.

C is right in parallel.

according parallelism, it should be not A but B.

Any explanation? Thanks.

Kudos [?]: 822 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1207

Kudos [?]: 822 [6], given: 0

Location: Taiwan
Re: Research during the past several decades on the nature of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2005, 06:09
6
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
singh_satya wrote:
Research during the past several decades on the nature of language and the processes that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity.
(A) that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity
(B) of producing and understanding it have revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity
(C) by which it is produced and understood has revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity
(D) by which it is produced and understood have revealed great complexity rather than underlying simplicity
(E) by which one produces and understands it have revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity

Satya

A-HA, I got it why not C. A and C are two kind of meaning.

Guys, reviewed A more carefully.

(A)..... process that produce(watch out! there is no objective) and make it(research) understandable.
There are two actions; one is produce, and the other is make it understandable. (we don't know produce what? )

However, in (C). Passive voice is ambiguous
(.... by which it is produced and understood ..... )

(is preposition by a common preposition or not ?)

we cannot make sure preposition by belongs which verb? ( be produced by? be understood by? or both)

I hope you understand what I'm talking about.

Kudos [?]: 822 [6], given: 0

Director
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 896

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Re: Research during the past several decades on the nature of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2005, 08:37
I don't understand this either. I initially picked (A) but there is no grammatical explanation behind my picking (A).
Now why is (C) wrong though?

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Posts: 893

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 0

Re: Research during the past several decades on the nature of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2005, 09:26
Please conclude which is wrong or right?

I picked (C) over (A), but no specific grammatical reason. Please confirm what is the reason behind picking (A).

Thanks

Kudos [?]: 65 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2231

Kudos [?]: 377 [0], given: 0

Re: Research during the past several decades on the nature of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2005, 10:25
(C) is not good because it uses passive voice non necessarily. However (A) is wrong because it misses a "it" after "produce", as if it was saying the processes "produce it understandable" and "make it understandable".

Do we know the source of the question? OE?
_________________

Keep on asking, and it will be given you;
keep on seeking, and you will find;
keep on knocking, and it will be opened to you.

Kudos [?]: 377 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1431

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

Re: Research during the past several decades on the nature of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2005, 13:01
HongHu wrote:
(C) is not good because it uses passive voice non necessarily. However (A) is wrong because it misses a "it" after "produce", as if it was saying the processes "produce it understandable" and "make it understandable".

Do we know the source of the question? OE?

I think "A" is best here. Can't we say e.g. "Plz give me that tomato, we are going to cut and chop it in half".....I think the last and only "it" can stand for both cut it and chop it....right ?

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2231

Kudos [?]: 377 [0], given: 0

Re: Research during the past several decades on the nature of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2005, 13:23
Exactly. If you say "cut and chop it in half" that means you "cut it in half and chop it in half". If you say "produce and make it understandable", it would mean "produce it understandable and make it understandable". However "produce it understandable" is obviously not right. What you should say is "produce it and make it understandable."
_________________

Keep on asking, and it will be given you;
keep on seeking, and you will find;
keep on knocking, and it will be opened to you.

Kudos [?]: 377 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Posts: 245

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Location: Rockville
Re: Research during the past several decades on the nature of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2005, 15:15
HongHu wrote:
Exactly. If you say "cut and chop it in half" that means you "cut it in half and chop it in half". If you say "produce and make it understandable", it would mean "produce it understandable and make it understandable". However "produce it understandable" is obviously not right. What you should say is "produce it and make it understandable."

I agree with Hong A is unclear with its use of "it" and C changes the sentence using passive voice which makes the sentence inappropriate because it can be rephrased in active without losing the meaning

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 25 Oct 2004
Posts: 246

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Re: Research during the past several decades on the nature of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2005, 09:02
Research during the past several decades on the nature of language and the processes that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity.
(A) that produce and make it understandable has revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity
(B) of producing and understanding it have revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity
(C) by which it is produced and understood has revealed not underlying simplicity but great complexity
(D) by which it is produced and understood have revealed great complexity rather than underlying simplicity
(E) by which one produces and understands it have revealed great complexity instead of underlying simplicity

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 19 Feb 2005
Posts: 486

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Location: Milan Italy
Re: Research during the past several decades on the nature of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2005, 09:35
I. Do we need a singular verb? Hope it's yes.
so (B) (D) and (E) are out.

(A)?

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 18 Feb 2005
Posts: 668

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: Research during the past several decades on the nature of [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Apr 2005, 09:52
Tough one....

Looks A to me.....Just going by ear ....

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Re: Research during the past several decades on the nature of   [#permalink] 17 Apr 2005, 09:52

Go to page    1   2   3   4   5   6    Next  [ 120 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Research during the past several decades on the nature of

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.