AdityaHongunti wrote:
3. According to the passage, which of the following
is true?C. One of the most important ways of boosting employee performance is encouraging them to accept some level of stress as a part of the job.
- "encouraging employees to accept some level of stress as an inevitability and perceive it as a motivator and a fuel to growth,
is vital for boosting the performance of the workforce."
Now i have a doubt if something is "vital" ... isnt it
one of the most important??
The choice does not say "most imporatnat" but says "one of the most"...if someting is vita;l isnt it one of the most imp??
vital emeaning : absolutely necessary !!
E. When happiness is triggered by success, it is anything but everlasting.
- "because success is a moving target, the happiness that results from success
is fleeting. "
fleeting = temporary ...
Between C and E .. i chose E for too much evidence...but i still need an explanation for C..
generis Skywalker18 jennpt AdityaHongunti , your observation is very good. +1
I have seen only one GMAT RC passage -- a very hard one -- that requires the level
of logical distinction that I present.
I can defend (E) over (C) based on very subtle logic.
Option (C) directly refers to this statement, as you note:
Accordingly, encouraging employees to accept some level of stress as an inevitability
and perceive it as a motivator and a fuel to growth,
is vital for boosting the performance of the workforce.
The general subject is the relationship between positive mind-set and performing well.
If I am really nitpicking . . .
The sentence most relevant to (C) mentions a
second condition connected
to stress and employee performance.
Employers must encourage employees
to accept stress as inevitableandto perceive stress as a positive force in two ways.
Note the compound object of encouraging [employees]
TO:
. . . encouraging employees
to accept some level of stress as an inevitability
and [to] perceive it as a motivator and a fuel to growth,
is vital for boosting performance.
If I tell my employees merely to accept stress as an inevitability
I state the obvious.
To use vernacular, I tell the employees to "suck it up."
On the other hand, if I tell my employees to re-think what they normally perceive as negative;
if I tell them to perceive stress as a motivator and fuel to growth [OF growth],
then I have given them a way to—well, not necessarily welcome stress all the time,
but at least to hope that they can channel stress in good ways that produce good work and more happiness.
I first remove the employees' resistance: you cannot change the fact that stress is inevitable.
Then I help shift their mindset from mere passive acceptance of stress
to at least occasional mental embrace.
According to this logic, I have changed the employees' mindset from
resigned acceptance to acceptance
for good reason.
That "for good reason" (stress can produce good outcomes) is part of the
general theme of the passage and the study, namely,
the relationship between positive mindset and performance
and the malleability of that relationship.
(E) is the better answer. But your point is well-taken.
_________________
—The only thing more dangerous than ignorance is arrogance. ~Einstein—I stand with Ukraine.
Donate to Help Ukraine!