Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 29 May 2017, 09:49

# Today:

Memorial Day - GMAT Club Tests are Open without Subscription

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 06 May 2009
Posts: 74
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 105 [0], given: 3

Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2009, 00:19
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

67% (01:45) correct 33% (00:50) wrong based on 594 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for heart attack patients was extremely important but more research was needed to determine that balloon angioplasty preceded with ultrasound was or was not any better for heart attack patients than the balloon procedure by itself.

A. more research was needed to determine that balloon angioplasty preceded with ultrasound was or was not any better for heart attack patients than

B. more research was needed for determining whether or not balloon angioplasty preceded by ultrasound is any better for heart attack patients than is

C. that more research was needed to determine whether balloon angioplasty preceded by ultrasound is any better for heart attack patients than

D. that more research was needed to determine that balloon angioplasty preceded with ultrasound was any better for heart attack patients than

E. that more research was needed for determining that balloon angioplasty preceded by ultrasound is or is not any better for heart attack patients than is
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
If you have any questions
New!
Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2009
Posts: 190
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 360 [0], given: 60

Re: Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2009, 00:28
A. wrong construction 'was or was not'. Wrong time ('is' required)
B. 'whether or not' - right construction. 'Was' changed to 'is'. Than correctly terminated by 'is'. Right one - correct answer
C-E. 'but that' is awkward and ungrammatical.

What is OA?
Director
Joined: 03 Jun 2009
Posts: 790
Location: New Delhi
WE 1: 5.5 yrs in IT
Followers: 85

Kudos [?]: 818 [1] , given: 56

Re: Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2009, 01:10
1
KUDOS
IMO C.

The sentence is using the structure X but Y, we need to maintain parallelism between X and Y.
Here to maintain parallelism, we need to have a "that" after "but"
Researchers agreed that the study......but that more research....
_________________
Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 822
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 106

Re: Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2009, 01:11
I am not fan of 'whether or not', 'whether' is sufficient.

IMO:

- agreed that .. , but that -> shows parallelism.
Can someone confirm?

- Also in B 'is' is not necessary in end.
Is it?

I pick C.
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ...
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 822
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 106

Re: Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2009, 01:13
thanks bigoyal for explantion!

I guess, my post lagged by few seconds.
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ...
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Retired Moderator
Status: The last round
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Posts: 1300
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
Followers: 81

Kudos [?]: 1078 [0], given: 157

Re: Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2009, 01:53
Just a little query!!

The whole sentence is of past tense.

Why we are using "is" in below phrase
balloon angioplasty preceded by ultrasound is any better for heart attack patients ..

Why not "was"???
_________________
Manager
Joined: 14 Jun 2009
Posts: 96
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 22 [0], given: 9

Re: Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2009, 02:20
i have the same doubt as above...and was actually inclined towards option D
Manager
Joined: 06 May 2009
Posts: 74
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 105 [0], given: 3

Re: Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2009, 03:39
arvs212 wrote:
i have the same doubt as above...and was actually inclined towards option D

OA is B
What do u think guys OA is correct?
Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2009
Posts: 190
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 360 [0], given: 60

Re: Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2009, 04:07
ankur55 wrote:
OA is B
What do u think guys OA is correct?

I derived the same answer, so I definitely think it's correct.

We already started new clause with conjunction 'but', so 'that' is absolutely redundant here!

Last edited by DenisSh on 29 Jul 2009, 04:18, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2009
Posts: 190
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 360 [0], given: 60

Re: Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2009, 04:12
Hussain15 wrote:
Just a little query!! ... Why not "was"???

Reseach was conducted in the past, but 'balloon angioplasty preceded by ultrasound' is better in the past and present.

Past: balloon angioplasty was better (until sth. new is invented)
Present: balloon angioplasty is better (still nothing is better)
Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 822
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 106

Re: Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2009, 04:28
DenisSh wrote:
ankur55 wrote:
OA is B
What do u think guys OA is correct?

I derived the same answer, so I definitely think it's correct.

We already started new clause with conjunction 'but', so 'that' is absolutely redundant here!

what about the clauses when we use it with the conjunction 'and'? In that case, we look for parallelism "and that". Why in that case 'that' is not redundant?
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ...
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 822
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 322 [0], given: 106

Re: Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2009, 04:29
arvs212 wrote:
i have the same doubt as above...and was actually inclined towards option D

IMO:
In D, "determined that" makes it in a subjunctive mood, so usage of 'was' is not correct.
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ...
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2009
Posts: 190
Followers: 4

Kudos [?]: 360 [0], given: 60

Re: Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2009, 04:31
sudeep wrote:
what about the clauses when we use it with the conjunction 'and'? In that case, we look for parallelism "and that"...

Please give me one example of such sentence.
Intern
Joined: 23 Jul 2009
Posts: 35
Followers: 20

Kudos [?]: 120 [2] , given: 6

Re: Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2009, 04:35
2
KUDOS
None of the answer choices are perfect:

A. "Preceded with" is wrong. Should be "preceded by"
"was or was not" unidiomatic, wordy and awkward.
B. "Whether or not" is redundant and hence wrong on the GMAT. Whether should suffice.
"For determining" is wrong. It should be "to determine"
C. The use of "that" is avoidable but doesnt make the construction wrong. the best among the given options
D. "Preceded with" is wrong. Should be "preceded by"
E. "For determining" is wrong. It should be "to determine"
"is or is not" unidiomatic, wordy and awkward.
Director
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 822
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Followers: 11

Kudos [?]: 322 [2] , given: 106

Re: Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Jul 2009, 05:00
2
KUDOS
See this:

nice explanation!!
http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/post1993.html#p1993
summary:
C is the best.
- 'but that' is correct for parallelism.
- to determine
- preceded by

Also something useful for "conjunction +that"
http://www.urch.com/forums/gmat-sentenc ... epaet.html

HTH
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ...
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Manager
Joined: 15 Jun 2009
Posts: 156
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 56 [0], given: 8

Re: Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2009, 05:06
DenisSh wrote:
ankur55 wrote:
OA is B
What do u think guys OA is correct?

I derived the same answer, so I definitely think it's correct.

We already started new clause with conjunction 'but', so 'that' is absolutely redundant here!

but here is conujction and not cordinating conjunction..so it is use to show contrat.....to work as coordinating conjunction it(but) must come after comma.....
Retired Moderator
Status: The last round
Joined: 18 Jun 2009
Posts: 1300
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V34
Followers: 81

Kudos [?]: 1078 [0], given: 157

Re: Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Sep 2009, 03:13
researchers-81565.html

_________________
Manager
Joined: 14 Dec 2008
Posts: 165
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 39

Re: Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Sep 2009, 05:02
A is the best
B & C - whether is not used properly
D - that not used propely
E - too lengthy
Manager
Joined: 01 Jul 2009
Posts: 225
Followers: 3

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 39

Re: Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Sep 2009, 09:59
"was or was not" is kind of awkward for me. So I choose B.
_________________

Consider giving Kudos if you like the post.

Manager
Joined: 08 Nov 2005
Posts: 181
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 10

Re: Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Sep 2009, 10:22
IMO B
A was or was not wrong
C, D Need to is not idimomatic, isnt it?
E is or is not doesnt sound right
Re: Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for   [#permalink] 25 Sep 2009, 10:22

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 48 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
5 Researchers are studying plastics that dissolve 0 05 Sep 2014, 04:20
Academicians tend to praise research that agrees with their 2 08 Jan 2012, 09:19
3 Although the researchers agreed unanimously on their 7 13 Sep 2016, 06:31
Although the researchers agreed unanimously on their 11 25 Mar 2012, 00:34
Researchers agreed that the study of new treatments for 0 20 Mar 2017, 18:53
Display posts from previous: Sort by