GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 13 Dec 2018, 01:25

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in December
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2526272829301
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
303112345
Open Detailed Calendar
  • The winning strategy for 700+ on the GMAT

     December 13, 2018

     December 13, 2018

     08:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    What people who reach the high 700's do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we collected on over 50,000 students who used examPAL.
  • GMATbuster's Weekly GMAT Quant Quiz, Tomorrow, Saturday at 9 AM PST

     December 14, 2018

     December 14, 2018

     09:00 AM PST

     10:00 AM PST

    10 Questions will be posted on the forum and we will post a reply in this Topic with a link to each question. There are prizes for the winners.

Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnos

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2011
Posts: 43
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GPA: 3.4
Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnos  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 10 Aug 2018, 01:56
3
20
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

48% (00:52) correct 52% (00:51) wrong based on 853 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnostic tests o identify food allergies, such as milk, that supposedly disrupt normal behavior.


(A) to identify food allergies, such as

(B) to identify food allergies, like

(C) to identify food allergies, such as to

(D) for identifying food allergies, like that of

(E) for identifying food allergies, such as for

Originally posted by Ankit04041987 on 07 Jun 2012, 08:56.
Last edited by Bunuel on 10 Aug 2018, 01:56, edited 2 times in total.
Underlined the sentence
Most Helpful Expert Reply
Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2011
Posts: 56
GRE 1: Q800 V800

GRE 2: Q800 V800

Re: Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnos  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jun 2012, 13:46
9
2
I'm just going to reproduce this with the underlining in place:
Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnostic tests to identify food allergies, such as milk, that supposedly disrupt normal behavior.
(A) to identify food allergies, such as
(B) to identify food allergies, like
(C) to identify food allergies, such as to
(D) for identifying food allergies, like that of
(E) for identifying food allergies, such as for

The MGMAT approach usually starts with splits, but sometimes we make exceptions. In particular, when the original sentence includes a parallel marker, we know that the stuff after that marker must be structurally similar to some earlier logically comparable stuff. In this case, the phrase such as is a sort of parallel marker. Whatever follows the such as has to be an example of food allergies.
A) Milk is not an allergy. Eliminate A.
B) This still offers milk as an example of an allergy, or perhaps compares allergies to milk. Either way, it's wrong. Eliminate B.
C) As awkward as this sounds, it's actually defensible. Such as to here means such as (an allergy) to. Don't eliminate C.
D) That stands in for allergies, creating two problems. First, that is singular while allergies is plural. Second, allergy of is unidiomatic. Eliminate D.
E) Allergy for is also unidiomatic. Eliminate E.

C it is.

By the way, I imagine that some began by eliminating B and D, because they use like rather than such as to introduce an example. That's actually a complicated issue.
First, every time that I have seen a choice between like and such as on a real GMAT SC, the right answer used such as.
BUT second, in at least one OG explanation, GMAC acknowledges that like can introduce examples in some circumstances.
BUT third, you should not use like to introduce examples unless you mean those examples to be restrictive. If I say I enjoy movies like Miller's Crossing, I mean I enjoy movies relevantly similar to Miller's Crossing. I'm not just giving you an example of a movie, but an example of the sort of movie I enjoy.
SO finally, like is wrong for the sentence above. Feel free to eliminate B and D for that reason.

Oh, and a small point about daagh's answer. I agree with him that this seems an unlikely question, but the comma before that isn't a problem, because the comma doesn't introduce the that clause, it closes the phrase right before the that clause.

Want more detail? Daagh is correct that you shouldn't use a comma to introduce a restrictive clause, and that relative clauses that begin with that are restrictive, but the comma isn't used to introduce the clause here. Rather, the pair of commas are used to set off the phrase such as to milk. Without that phrase, the correct answer would read, Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnostic tests to identify food allergies that supposedly disrupt normal behavior. No comma problems.
_________________


Manhattan GMAT Instructor


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews

General Discussion
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 28 Sep 2011
Posts: 60
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 520 Q34 V27
GMAT 3: 690 Q47 V38
GPA: 3.01
WE: Information Technology (Commercial Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnos  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jun 2012, 09:22
1
I ended up choosing E. Hopefully someone can explain why C is a better choice over E.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 09 May 2011
Posts: 28
Re: Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnos  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jun 2012, 09:34
I also choose E..why is C correct???
Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4554
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnos  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jun 2012, 10:03
2
Please rest assured that this topic would never appear in GMAT. The non-underlined part has a comma before ‘that’ and the relative pronoun is supposed to modify either tests or allergies, which are far placed from where they should stand. Milk cannot be its modifier. After all, milk is not supposedly going to disrupt normal behavior.

Still for the heck of it, let us solve this.

The passge seeks to avoid some experiments to identify food allergies to some foods such as to milk. If we do not use the preposition ‘to’ milk, then milk itself becomes the allergy, which is rather illogical. In addition, who is going to spend in costly experiments to identify ordinary foods such as milk?

Hence, the use of preposition to becomes essential in the given context. It may be noted that ‘to’ is not an infinitive, which normally precedes a base verb. Therefore, C is the choice, in spite of the inelegance of the phrase such as to milk.

_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 14 Apr 2015
Posts: 53
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnos  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Nov 2015, 06:31
ashish8 wrote:
I ended up choosing E. Hopefully someone can explain why C is a better choice over E.


The correct idiom is - allergy to something, not allergy for something.
Current Student
avatar
Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Posts: 82
Location: Brazil
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.3
Re: Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnos  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Dec 2015, 09:09
I chose C

A and B -> wrong comparison, milk is not an allergy
D -> That is singular, and the use of LIKE is wrong

Between C and E, I chose the one that is more concise and clear, therefore C
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 26 Jan 2016
Posts: 67
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V36
GPA: 3.01
Reviews Badge
Re: Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnos  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 May 2016, 04:06
The question here has to be better, Thought answer choice "C" is right, still the question format can be improved.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 14 May 2014
Posts: 60
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.44
Re: Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnos  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 May 2016, 05:10
daagh wrote:
Please rest assured that this topic would never appear in GMAT. The non-underlined part has a comma before ‘that’ and the relative pronoun is supposed to modify either tests or allergies, which are far placed from where they should stand. Milk cannot be its modifier. After all, milk is not supposedly going to disrupt normal behavior.

Still for the heck of it, let us solve this.

The passge seeks to avoid some experiments to identify food allergies to some foods such as to milk. If we do not use the preposition ‘to’ milk, then milk itself becomes the allergy, which is rather illogical. In addition, who is going to spend in costly experiments to identify ordinary foods such as milk?

Hence, the use of preposition to becomes essential in the given context. It may be noted that ‘to’ is not an infinitive, which normally precedes a base verb. Therefore, C is the choice, in spite of the inelegance of the phrase such as to milk.


Daagh I have a question

Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnostic tests to identify food allergies, such as milk, that supposedly disrupt normal behavior.

(C) to identify food allergies, such as to
(E) for identifying food allergies, such as for

My knowledge regarding to(participle form) vs for+ing says that to-->intention for-->result
I think that for identifying( a result) is much much better than to identify

Please shed some light on my understanding of to/ for split or we are not considering this in our question at all?
Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Status: Preparing for GMAT!!
Joined: 11 Oct 2015
Posts: 131
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.1
WE: General Management (Entertainment and Sports)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnos  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Dec 2016, 07:13
Ankit04041987 wrote:
Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnostic tests to identify food allergies, such as milk, that supposedly disrupt normal behavior.
(A) to identify food allergies, such as
(B) to identify food allergies, like
(C) to identify food allergies, such as to
(D) for identifying food allergies, like that of
(E) for identifying food allergies, such as for


How to elilminate wrong answers?

Choices B & E use like to present examples - Eliminated
A presents milk as allergy - Eliminated
E - allergic to is right usage, not for.

C
_________________

Yours,
Siva Rama Krishna Meka :)

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 06 Oct 2015
Posts: 49
Re: Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnos  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Dec 2016, 08:40
Sirakri wrote:
Ankit04041987 wrote:
Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnostic tests to identify food allergies, such as milk, that supposedly disrupt normal behavior.
(A) to identify food allergies, such as
(B) to identify food allergies, like
(C) to identify food allergies, such as to
(D) for identifying food allergies, like that of
(E) for identifying food allergies, such as for


How to elilminate wrong answers?

Choices B & E use like to present examples - Eliminated
A presents milk as allergy - Eliminated
E - allergic to is right usage, not for.

C



Question here, I thought "to/for" are tied to "use" not "allergic". "use for doing something" vs "use to do something" the first sounds better. Ended up picking E because of this
Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1357
Re: Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnos  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Dec 2016, 12:08
1
There's more than one "to." Only C correctly describes an allergy "to milk."
_________________


Dmitry Farber | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | New York


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Director
Director
User avatar
P
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 628
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V38
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnos  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 06 Jan 2017, 21:56
IMO its C :
Idiom error - allergy to -
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 04 Oct 2016
Posts: 124
Location: China
Concentration: Healthcare, Entrepreneurship
WE: Sales (Health Care)
Re: Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnos  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jan 2017, 20:51
MichaelS wrote:
I'm just going to reproduce this with the underlining in place:
Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnostic tests to identify food allergies, such as milk, that supposedly disrupt normal behavior.
(A) to identify food allergies, such as
(B) to identify food allergies, like
(C) to identify food allergies, such as to
(D) for identifying food allergies, like that of
(E) for identifying food allergies, such as for

The MGMAT approach usually starts with splits, but sometimes we make exceptions. In particular, when the original sentence includes a parallel marker, we know that the stuff after that marker must be structurally similar to some earlier logically comparable stuff. In this case, the phrase such as is a sort of parallel marker. Whatever follows the such as has to be an example of food allergies.
A) Milk is not an allergy. Eliminate A.
B) This still offers milk as an example of an allergy, or perhaps compares allergies to milk. Either way, it's wrong. Eliminate B.
C) As awkward as this sounds, it's actually defensible. Such as to here means such as (an allergy) to. Don't eliminate C.
D) That stands in for allergies, creating two problems. First, that is singular while allergies is plural. Second, allergy of is unidiomatic. Eliminate D.
E) Allergy for is also unidiomatic. Eliminate E.

C it is.

By the way, I imagine that some began by eliminating B and D, because they use like rather than such as to introduce an example. That's actually a complicated issue.
First, every time that I have seen a choice between like and such as on a real GMAT SC, the right answer used such as.
BUT second, in at least one OG explanation, GMAC acknowledges that like can introduce examples in some circumstances.
BUT third, you should not use like to introduce examples unless you mean those examples to be restrictive. If I say I enjoy movies like Miller's Crossing, I mean I enjoy movies relevantly similar to Miller's Crossing. I'm not just giving you an example of a movie, but an example of the sort of movie I enjoy.
SO finally, like is wrong for the sentence above. Feel free to eliminate B and D for that reason.

Oh, and a small point about daagh's answer. I agree with him that this seems an unlikely question, but the comma before that isn't a problem, because the comma doesn't introduce the that clause, it closes the phrase right before the that clause.

Want more detail? Daagh is correct that you shouldn't use a comma to introduce a restrictive clause, and that relative clauses that begin with that are restrictive, but the comma isn't used to introduce the clause here. Rather, the pair of commas are used to set off the phrase such as to milk. Without that phrase, the correct answer would read, Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnostic tests to identify food allergies that supposedly disrupt normal behavior. No comma problems.

this elaborated all the confusions metioned through the thread~great help~
_________________

LSAT CR is driving me mad

Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 23 Jul 2015
Posts: 156
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnos  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Feb 2017, 22:39
Ankit04041987 wrote:
Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnostic tests to identify food allergies, such as milk, that supposedly disrupt normal behavior.
(A) to identify food allergies, such as
(B) to identify food allergies, like
(C) to identify food allergies, such as to
(D) for identifying food allergies, like that of
(E) for identifying food allergies, such as for


How to elilminate wrong answers?

The use of X to identify is a correct idiom usage. Eliminate D & E
like is incorrectly used to present examples - eliminate B

"such as milk" here milk is nonsensically presented as an example of food allergies - eliminate A

Ans: C
Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 520
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnos  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Mar 2017, 08:22
Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnostic tests to identify food allergies, such as milk, that supposedly disrupt normal behavior.

(A) to identify food allergies, such as
(B) to identify food allergies, like
(C) to identify food allergies, such as to
(D) for identifying food allergies, like that of
(E) for identifying food allergies, such as for


Like is used for comparison , as is used for example

Option A is change in intended meaning since milk itself is not an allergy,
Option B is incorrect usage of like,
Option C is correct answer(idiomatically as well),
Option D is incorrect usage of like,
Option E is right usage of as but such as for is idiomatically incorrect.
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 3510
Premium Member
Re: Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnos  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Oct 2018, 04:30
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

-
April 2018: New Forum dedicated to Verbal Strategies, Guides, and Resources

GMAT Club Bot
Re: Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnos &nbs [#permalink] 11 Oct 2018, 04:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Researchers have questioned the use of costly and experimental diagnos

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.