It is currently 22 Jun 2017, 19:02

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Researchers in Germany..

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 12 Dec 2011
Posts: 11
Location: Italy
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT Date: 04-09-2013
GPA: 4
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2013, 06:35
2
KUDOS
8
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

15% (low)

Question Stats:

70% (01:53) correct 30% (01:06) wrong based on 816 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunitng ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.

a) it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who
b) it appears had been an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and stunning evidence that human ancestors
c) appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and is stunning evidence that human ancestors
d) appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors
e) appears that it is an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence of human ancestors who

Does any expert have an explaination for this question?
Thank you
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3211

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2013, 09:10
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
marioslash wrote:
Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunitng ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.

a) it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who
b) it appears had been an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and stunning evidence that human ancestors
c) appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and is stunning evidence that human ancestors
d) appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors
e) appears that it is an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence of human ancestors who

Does any expert have an explaination for this question?
Thank you

in A and B after what it has no sense because IT has an unclear antecedent: it refers to germany. Moreover, it doen'st appear by itself. so out

C D E

C appear was an ancient .........hunting ground.....AND is stunning...... clearly not parallel and the sentence doesn't show a clear meaning

E stunning of human is wrong . simply becasue the eveidence shows something so we need a restrictive pronoun "that". Using OF distort the meaning.

D wins. I admit that this question is pretty tough and convoluted.

regards
_________________
Director
Joined: 03 Aug 2012
Posts: 893
Concentration: General Management, General Management
GMAT 1: 630 Q47 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.7
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2014, 13:30
Although I marked it correctly, I was in mars while I was inferring the meaning.

Can anyone throw some light on the meaning of the above sentence?
_________________

Rgds,
TGC!
_____________________________________________________________________
I Assisted You => KUDOS Please
_____________________________________________________________________________

Moderator
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3211

### Show Tags

23 Jun 2014, 13:44
Quote:
I was in mars

on............you were not inside mars, under the mantel down to the core
_________________
Manager
Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Posts: 101

### Show Tags

24 Jun 2014, 07:45
3
KUDOS
TGC wrote:
Although I marked it correctly, I was in mars while I was inferring the meaning.

Can anyone throw some light on the meaning of the above sentence?

Researchers have found X from (a place ) what appears to be Y (place), STUNning ( Verb+ing modifier modifying entire preceding clause) evidence that (some postulation) human ancestors systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.

Hope it helps !
_________________

Best
MKS
Appreciate it with Kudos !!

Director
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 665
Location: Bangalore, India

### Show Tags

24 Jun 2014, 08:43
3
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
MKS wrote:
Researchers have found X from (a place ) what appears to be Y (place), STUNning ( Verb+ing modifier modifying entire preceding clause) evidence that (some postulation) human ancestors systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.

Actually stunning in this case is not modifying preceding clause; it is just used as a pureplay adjective, modifying the noun evidence (in the sense that the evidence is stunning).

This sentence actually uses an absolute modifier construct (evidence that human ancestors systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed). Absolute modifiers are tested quite extensively on GMAT and test takers must make themselves very comfortable with this construct, especially since this is not a very intuitive construct.

p.s. Absolute modifiers have been discussed in detail in our book. If you can PM me your mail id, I can send the corresponding section to you.
_________________

Thanks,
Ashish (GMAT Faculty @ EducationAisle)
http://www.EducationAisle.com

Sentence Correction Nirvana available at Amazon.in and Flipkart

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi.com

Intern
Joined: 04 May 2014
Posts: 10

### Show Tags

24 Jun 2014, 10:55
marioslash wrote:
Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunitng ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.

a) it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who
b) it appears had been an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and stunning evidence that human ancestors
c) appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and is stunning evidence that human ancestors
d) appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors
e) appears that it is an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence of human ancestors who

Does any expert have an explaination for this question?
Thank you

Meaning: Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,00 -year old wooden spears .
Researchers have unearthed something from some where

in other way around, we can say:

Researchers have unearthed something from that( instead of what) place , which appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground.
" from what appears........hunting ground" acts as a prepositional phrase modifier modifying verb "have earthed", answering the question from where Researchers have unearthed.

"stunning evidence that human ancestors........." is a absolute phrase modifier modifying entire clause.
Current Student
Status: Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 962
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

### Show Tags

25 Jun 2014, 08:59
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Unlock the convoluted sentence by referring following examples :

Simple:: I purchased vegetables from a Japanese shop. <<--- I am confident that shop was of a Japanese
Complex:: I purchased vegetables from what appears to be a Japanese shop. <<--- Here I am trying to figure out that it appears to be a Japanese shop.

Choice D is written on similar lines with additional absolute phrase modifier stunning evidence in the end.

Thank by Kudos if above explanation cleared your doubts
_________________

Piyush K
-----------------------
Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is to try just one more time. ― Thomas A. Edison
Don't forget to press--> Kudos
My Articles: 1. WOULD: when to use? | 2. All GMATPrep RCs (New)
Tip: Before exam a week earlier don't forget to exhaust all gmatprep problems specially for "sentence correction".

Manager
Joined: 17 Oct 2012
Posts: 73
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

### Show Tags

15 Dec 2014, 06:27
1
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Word 'appear' only takes infinitive, and only D uses it correctly.
Manager
Status: Manager
Affiliations: Manager
Joined: 06 Nov 2012
Posts: 169
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Sustainability
Schools: Boston U '19 (D)
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V29
GMAT 2: 680 Q49 V33
GPA: 3
WE: Supply Chain Management (Energy and Utilities)

### Show Tags

16 Dec 2014, 01:47
Can someone please put more lights on right usage of following:

'' Appear as
Appear to (be)
Appear that ''

AND

'' Evidence of
Evidence that ''
_________________

Hard-work, Perseverance and Commitment.....

Manager
Joined: 25 Sep 2015
Posts: 142
Location: United States

### Show Tags

08 Dec 2015, 22:02
marioslash wrote:
Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunitng ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.

a) it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who
b) it appears had been an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and stunning evidence that human ancestors
c) appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and is stunning evidence that human ancestors
d) appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors
e) appears that it is an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence of human ancestors who

Does any expert have an explaination for this question?
Thank you

1) It appears - does not go with 'was'
2) It appears - does not go wit'h had been'
3) Same as a
4) Correct
5) Stunning evidence of - does not make much sense
Manager
Joined: 01 Aug 2014
Posts: 55

### Show Tags

07 Mar 2016, 05:54
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
"It" in choices A & B are incorrect modifier, "appears was" is imprecise in choice C since two verbs are used together. "evidence of human ancestors", "Noun + of clause" is not preference in GMAT, " Noun + that + clause" as in choice D is better.
"appear + to be" is correct idiom.
Manager
Joined: 16 Mar 2016
Posts: 76
Schools: Tuck '19
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35

### Show Tags

31 Jul 2016, 12:29
marioslash wrote:
Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunitng ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.

a) it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who
b) it appears had been an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and stunning evidence that human ancestors
c) appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and is stunning evidence that human ancestors
d) appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors
e) appears that it is an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence of human ancestors who

Does any expert have an explaination for this question?
Thank you

I marked the answer correctly but was a little confused between C and D option. Can someone please tell what's wrong with C?
VP
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1412

### Show Tags

04 Aug 2016, 09:12
marioslash wrote:
Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunitng ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.

a) it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who
b) it appears had been an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and stunning evidence that human ancestors
c) appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and is stunning evidence that human ancestors
d) appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors
e) appears that it is an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence of human ancestors who

Does any expert have an explaination for this question?
Thank you

in A, I think "it appears" is correct.

it appears that he is a good student
He, it appears, is a good student.

in both sentences, "it" is a fake subject.

problem with A is that " evidence of human ancestors" is not logice

for example" evidence of you" , "evidence of alients " is not logic
evidence of existence of alients " are logic
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Re: Researchers in Germany..   [#permalink] 04 Aug 2016, 09:12
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
1 In 1945, Germany was defeated by the Allies, ended its 4 09 Jun 2017, 11:49
9 Like the wines from Germany, also an area with 5 15 Jul 2016, 13:48
1 Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old 6 01 Jun 2015, 14:41
7 Germany's most infamous leader, Hitler's policies were 16 29 Sep 2015, 12:57
2 It appears illogical to some people that West Germany, which 6 30 Aug 2014, 11:27
Display posts from previous: Sort by