VeritasPrepKarishma wrote:
Quote:
Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.
A. it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who
B. it appears had been an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and stunning evidence that human ancestors
C. appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and is stunning evidence that human ancestors
D. appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors
E. appears that it is an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence of human ancestors who
Could you please help us with this question ?
I am still not clear - how "stunning evidence" in (D) is modifying "spears"-a noun which is far away from the modifier...
'stunning evidence ... ' in (D) is an absolute phrase. An absolute phrase is a group of words that modifies an independent clause as a whole.
What is the evidence? It is that "400,000-year-old wooden spears have been unearthed from an ancient hunting ground". The entire clause is the evidence. It's something similar to appositive.
I am unable to understand how 'stunning evidence ... ' in (D) works as an absolute phrase. If we consider 'stunning evidence ... ' in (D) as appositive then it will modify the noun preceding the appositive and hence modifying "an ancient lakeshore hunting ground" and not the whole phrase in front of it.
Can you please clarify on it.