It is currently 25 Sep 2017, 12:06

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Respiratory Problems and Cosmetic Manufacturing Plants

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

SVP
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2133

Kudos [?]: 1571 [3], given: 8

Location: New York, NY
Respiratory Problems and Cosmetic Manufacturing Plants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2013, 13:27
3
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

63% (00:58) correct 37% (01:09) wrong based on 513 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

Higher rates of respiratory problems in Clark have been linked to the airborne pollutants being released from the Lauriel cosmetic manufacturing plant. In response to these new findings, the city imposed regulations on the Lauriel plant, requiring it to reduce emissions by half in two years’ time. While Lauriel has no problem meeting these new emission levels, it is unlikely that the rate of respiratory problems two years from now will be reduced since ______.

(A) the number of facilities capable of treating respiratory ailments is not likely to increase
(B) reducing emissions even further than suggested through regulation would necessitate decreasing production at Lauriel
(C) it is difficult to make accurate, long-term predictions about emissions
(D) not all respiratory ailments are caused by airborne pollutants
(E) two new cosmetic manufacturing plants are about to go into production in Clark

original source:Practice Pill Platform
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by GMATPill on 11 Aug 2013, 08:39, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 1571 [3], given: 8

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 329

Kudos [?]: 223 [0], given: 12

Re: Respiratory Problems and Cosmetic Manufacturing Plants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2013, 15:48
GMATPill wrote:
Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

Higher rates of respiratory problems in Clark have been linked to the airborne pollutants being released from the Lauriel cosmetic manufacturing plant. In response to these new findings, the city imposed regulations on the Lauriel plant, requiring it to reduce emissions by half in two years’ time. While Lauriel has no problem meeting these new emission levels, it is unlikely that the rate of respiratory problems two years from now will be reduced since ______.

(A) the number of facilities capable of treating respiratory ailments is not likely to increase
(B) reducing emissions even further than suggested through regulation would necessitate decreasing production at Lauriel
(C) it is difficult to make accurate, long-term predictions about emissions
(D) not all respiratory ailments are caused by airborne pollutants
(E) two new cosmetic manufacturing plants are about to go into production in Clark

The answer is E as it clearly identifies why imposing limits on Lauriel plant will not work. The limit should be applied in general. here its specific.

Kudos [?]: 223 [0], given: 12

Manager
Joined: 10 Apr 2013
Posts: 123

Kudos [?]: 35 [1], given: 17

Re: Respiratory Problems and Cosmetic Manufacturing Plants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2013, 21:52
1
KUDOS
Tricky..

Both D & E qualify

D provides an alternate cause for respiratory problems still existing after two years inspite of the ban & E also provides the same.

However, both can be argued to be out of scope.

Premise states that respiratory problems in Clark are linked to the airborne pollutants being released from the Lauriel cosmetic manufacturing plant.

Hence D can be out of scope because it traces source of air pollutants beyond cosmetic manufacturing plants & E can be out of scope as it traces source of air pollutants beyond specifically Lauriel cosmetic manufacturing plant.

Look forward to clarity on this.

Regards

Argha

Kudos [?]: 35 [1], given: 17

Manager
Joined: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 148

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 41

Re: Respiratory Problems and Cosmetic Manufacturing Plants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Jul 2013, 22:25
Bluelagoon wrote:
GMATPill wrote:
Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

Higher rates of respiratory problems in Clark have been linked to the airborne pollutants being released from the Lauriel cosmetic manufacturing plant. In response to these new findings, the city imposed regulations on the Lauriel plant, requiring it to reduce emissions by half in two years’ time. While Lauriel has no problem meeting these new emission levels, it is unlikely that the rate of respiratory problems two years from now will be reduced since ______.

(A) the number of facilities capable of treating respiratory ailments is not likely to increase
(B) reducing emissions even further than suggested through regulation would necessitate decreasing production at Lauriel
(C) it is difficult to make accurate, long-term predictions about emissions
(D) not all respiratory ailments are caused by airborne pollutants
(E) two new cosmetic manufacturing plants are about to go into production in Clark

The answer is E as it clearly identifies why imposing limits on Lauriel plant will not work. The limit should be applied in general. here its specific.

Why E... There is no guarantee that these two new cosmetic manufacturing plants will produce pollution... They might use some different process...
IMO D..
_________________

MODULUS Concept ---> http://gmatclub.com/forum/inequalities-158054.html#p1257636
HEXAGON Theory ---> http://gmatclub.com/forum/hexagon-theory-tips-to-solve-any-heaxgon-question-158189.html#p1258308

Kudos [?]: 70 [0], given: 41

Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2011
Posts: 46

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 13

Re: Respiratory Problems and Cosmetic Manufacturing Plants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Aug 2013, 14:21
jaituteja wrote:
Bluelagoon wrote:
GMATPill wrote:
Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

Higher rates of respiratory problems in Clark have been linked to the airborne pollutants being released from the Lauriel cosmetic manufacturing plant. In response to these new findings, the city imposed regulations on the Lauriel plant, requiring it to reduce emissions by half in two years’ time. While Lauriel has no problem meeting these new emission levels, it is unlikely that the rate of respiratory problems two years from now will be reduced since ______.

(A) the number of facilities capable of treating respiratory ailments is not likely to increase
(B) reducing emissions even further than suggested through regulation would necessitate decreasing production at Lauriel
(C) it is difficult to make accurate, long-term predictions about emissions
(D) not all respiratory ailments are caused by airborne pollutants
(E) two new cosmetic manufacturing plants are about to go into production in Clark

The answer is E as it clearly identifies why imposing limits on Lauriel plant will not work. The limit should be applied in general. here its specific.

Why E... There is no guarantee that these two new cosmetic manufacturing plants will produce pollution... They might use some different process...
IMO D..

Though E is OA, I don't get why D is not correct. Anyone please help with the explanation. Thanks!

Kudos [?]: 20 [0], given: 13

Current Student
Joined: 25 Sep 2012
Posts: 290

Kudos [?]: 167 [0], given: 242

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 680 Q48 V34
Re: Respiratory Problems and Cosmetic Manufacturing Plants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Aug 2013, 23:32
About D, yes, It is a good choice but E is Better.

If you go with D, you are trying to question the impact of the airborne pollutants being released from the Lauriel cosmetic manufacturing plant.
You are trying to deny the first sentence as it clearly says that airborne pollutants are linked with respiratory problems.

Kudos [?]: 167 [0], given: 242

SVP
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2133

Kudos [?]: 1571 [0], given: 8

Location: New York, NY
Re: Respiratory Problems and Cosmetic Manufacturing Plants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2013, 08:39
Yes, that's a good point.

In terms of frameworks, here's how we think about it at GMAT PILL:

[Lauriel plant emissions] leads to [respiratory problems]

The passages suggests that emissions will go down.

So given that (A --> B), if we reduce/remove A - then one might think that B disappears.

If we reduce emissions, one might think that respiratory problems will disappear.

But the author says that will UNLIKELY happen because.... why?

Because something else OTHER than A (let's call it C) will lead to B.

If we have something else that leads to respiratory problems, then removing Lauriel emissions will not necessarily solve the respiratory problem.

That's exactly what (E) says.

(E) says that 2 NEW plants will come on - and that will lead to respiratory problems.

So even if we remove the original Lauriel emissions, those 2 new plants will still lead to respiratory problems.

So this is an example of the Linked Chains Frameworks between A, B, and C.

Negate it and you might expect that:

(Without A) --> there will be no B.

But actually, if something else C leads to B, then removing A will not necessarily lead to no B.

Because C will still lead to B.

Does that make sense?

Kudos [?]: 1571 [0], given: 8

Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2013
Posts: 55

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 31

Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GPA: 3.6
Re: Respiratory Problems and Cosmetic Manufacturing Plants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Aug 2013, 10:09
1
KUDOS
@GMATPill

Can we not consider
Lauriel cosmetic --> airborne pollutants -->Higher rates of respiratory problems

A --> B --> C

But looking at option D; [not all respiratory ailments are caused by airborne pollutants]

C can be caused by D.
D --> C

Please explain. (Options are too close. )

Kudos [?]: 11 [1], given: 31

Intern
Joined: 14 Feb 2012
Posts: 29

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 6

Re: Respiratory Problems and Cosmetic Manufacturing Plants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Oct 2013, 07:23
GMATPill wrote:
Yes, that's a good point.

In terms of frameworks, here's how we think about it at GMAT PILL:

[Lauriel plant emissions] leads to [respiratory problems]

The passages suggests that emissions will go down.

So given that (A --> B), if we reduce/remove A - then one might think that B disappears.

If we reduce emissions, one might think that respiratory problems will disappear.

But the author says that will UNLIKELY happen because.... why?

Because something else OTHER than A (let's call it C) will lead to B.

If we have something else that leads to respiratory problems, then removing Lauriel emissions will not necessarily solve the respiratory problem.

That's exactly what (E) says.

(E) says that 2 NEW plants will come on - and that will lead to respiratory problems.

So even if we remove the original Lauriel emissions, those 2 new plants will still lead to respiratory problems.

So this is an example of the Linked Chains Frameworks between A, B, and C.

Negate it and you might expect that:

(Without A) --> there will be no B.

But actually, if something else C leads to B, then removing A will not necessarily lead to no B.

Because C will still lead to B.

Does that make sense?

Can you not even see for yourself that something else that leads to b is perfectly addressed in option D?
I dont get the point why you are developing such amibigous questions at the CR part.

Most of the CR questions you develop are just slightly changed questions from the OG.
While you are doing decent things at other domains, your CR part is just awful.

You are not doing anyone a favour with posting these types of CR questions, as CR questions at test day will be very subtle, and answer choices above all will be clearly structured.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 6

Manager
Joined: 07 Apr 2012
Posts: 125

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 45

Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Operations
Schools: ISB '15
GMAT 1: 590 Q48 V23
GPA: 3.9
WE: Operations (Manufacturing)
Re: Respiratory Problems and Cosmetic Manufacturing Plants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2013, 12:35
For me its D. There is no certainty that new plants will also add up the pollution.
But having an alternate reason for existing pollution levels would mean shutting down plant may not have intended outcome.

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 45

Manager
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 52

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 25

Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V32
GPA: 3.56
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Re: Respiratory Problems and Cosmetic Manufacturing Plants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2013, 19:26
waltiebikkiebal wrote:
GMATPill wrote:

If we have something else that leads to respiratory problems, then removing Lauriel emissions will not necessarily solve the respiratory problem.

That's exactly what (E) says.

(E) says that 2 NEW plants will come on - and that will lead to respiratory problems.

E does not explicitly state that the two new cosmetic manufacturing plants lead to respiratory problems by releasing airborne pollutants, not does the passage state so. According to the passage,

"Higher rates of respiratory problems in Clark have been linked to the airborne pollutants being released from the Lauriel cosmetic manufacturing plant"

The respiratory problems are linked to pollutants released fro Lauriel cosmetic manufacturing plant only. Are we not generalizing this statement to all cosmetic manufacturing plants to arrive at our answer? It could be true that it is only Lauriel cosmetic manufacturing plant releases airborne pollutants and all other plants already follow strict norms and are likely to incorporate the same in their two new plants as well.

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 25

Manager
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 52

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 25

Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V32
GPA: 3.56
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Re: Respiratory Problems and Cosmetic Manufacturing Plants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Nov 2013, 19:33
ygdrasil24 wrote:
For me its D. There is no certainty that new plants will also add up the pollution.
But having an alternate reason for existing pollution levels would mean shutting down plant may not have intended outcome.

Similarly, even D appears debatable.

It says "not all" respiratory ailments are caused by airborne pollutants. Even if this were true, not all just means, not 100%. It could be anything from 0% to 99.9%. Let's say 60%. If 60% of respiratory ailments are caused by airborne pollutants which are in turn released from the Lauriel cosmetic manufacturing plant, it is no more an explanation why the rate of respiratory problems will not reduce over the next two years if the emissions are reduced.

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 25

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10174

Kudos [?]: 256 [0], given: 0

Re: Respiratory Problems and Cosmetic Manufacturing Plants [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 Dec 2014, 15:02
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 256 [0], given: 0

Re: Respiratory Problems and Cosmetic Manufacturing Plants   [#permalink] 13 Dec 2014, 15:02
Display posts from previous: Sort by