It is currently 19 Sep 2017, 13:54

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Responding to the publics fascination with-and sometimes

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1344

Kudos [?]: 798 [10], given: 10

Responding to the publics fascination with-and sometimes [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jun 2008, 20:24
10
KUDOS
98
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

46% (00:43) correct 54% (00:57) wrong based on 3827 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Responding to the public’s fascination with - and sometimes undue alarm over-possible threats from asteroids, a scale
developed by astronomers rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet may
collide with Earth.

A. a scale developed by astronomers rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet may
B. a scale that astronomers have developed rates how likely it is for a particular asteroid or comet to
C. astronomers have developed a scale to rate how likely a particular asteroid or comet will be to
D. astronomers have developed a scale for rating the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will
E. astronomers have developed a scale that rates the likelihood of a particular asteroid or comet that may
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by ankurgupta03 on 30 Apr 2014, 12:40, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 798 [10], given: 10

Manhattan GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 348

Kudos [?]: 1587 [22], given: 11

Location: San Francisco

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2010, 13:11
22
KUDOS
15
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Hey All,

I got asked to take this one on by private message, so here I am! This one has me a bit confused. I don't see how the OA can be C. Where is this question from?

Responding to the public’s fascination with-and sometimes undue alarm over-possible threats from asteroids, a scale developed by astronomers rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet may collide with Earth.

A. a scale developed by astronomers rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet may
PROBLEM: "Responding to..." is a participial phrase modifying a noun, so the noun has to come right after the comma. The astronomers responded, not the scale.

B. a scale that astronomers have developed rates how likely it is for a particular asteroid or comet to
PROBLEM: Same as above.

C. astronomers have developed a scale to rate how likely a particular asteroid or comet will be to
PROBLEM: You can't say "likely...will be to". It's gibberish. Your ear would recognize that if there weren't all those words in between, confusing things. Try a short example. You should always be able to replace "likely" with "probably".

My program determines how likely you will be to love me.
My program determines how probably you will be to love me...MAKES NO SENSE!

D. astronomers have developed a scale for rating the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will

E. astronomers have developed a scale that rates the likelihood of a particular asteroid or comet that may
PROBLEM: You can't have a likelihood of something that may happen. It's the likelihood that something WILL happen.

Hope that helps!

-t
_________________

Tommy Wallach | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Kudos [?]: 1587 [22], given: 11

Manhattan GMAT Instructor
Affiliations: ManhattanGMAT
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 348

Kudos [?]: 1587 [6], given: 11

Location: San Francisco

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2010, 10:15
6
KUDOS
Hey Munda,

First point. There are a few ways to use the word "likely", (one as a fill in for "probably": He is likely going to eat the chicken; one as a fill in for "probably going to": He is likely to eat the chicken; and one a fill-in for simply "probable": "It is likely."), but the sentence above uses it incorrectly in all senses. You can't talk about "how likely X will be to happen." You say "X is likely to happen." Or "Let's see how likely X is to happen." Not WILL BE.

Second point. None of your examples go against what I said. You can't have a likelihood of something THAT MAY HAPPEN. That's how it's put in answer choice E, "the likelihood of X that may happen."

-t
_________________

Tommy Wallach | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | San Francisco

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Reviews

Kudos [?]: 1587 [6], given: 11

Manager
Joined: 09 May 2008
Posts: 98

Kudos [?]: 26 [5], given: 0

### Show Tags

21 Jun 2008, 09:45
5
KUDOS
goalsnr wrote:
Responding to the public’s fascination with-and sometimes
undue alarm over-possible threats from asteroids,[
u] a scale
developed by astronomers rates the likelihood that a particular
asteroid or comet may[/u] collide with Earth.
A. a scale developed by astronomers rates the likelihood
that a particular asteroid or comet may
B. a scale that astronomers have developed rates how
likely it is for a particular asteroid or comet to
C. astronomers have developed a scale to rate how likely
a particular asteroid or comet will be to
D. astronomers have developed a scale for rating the
likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will
E. astronomers have developed a scale that rates the
likelihood of a particular asteroid or comet that may.

modifying clause in red must modify "astronomers" - eliminate A & B.
likelihood...may.. in E is incorrect - "may" is redundant.
in C - "will be to" is awkward.
IMO (d) is correct.

Kudos [?]: 26 [5], given: 0

VP
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 1344

Kudos [?]: 798 [4], given: 10

### Show Tags

22 Jun 2008, 07:31
4
KUDOS
goalsnr wrote:
Responding to the public’s fascination with-and sometimes
undue alarm over-possible threats from asteroids, a scale
developed by astronomers rates the likelihood that a particular
asteroid or comet may
collide with Earth.
A. a scale developed by astronomers rates the likelihood
that a particular asteroid or comet may
B. a scale that astronomers have developed rates how
likely it is for a particular asteroid or comet to
C. astronomers have developed a scale to rate how likely
a particular asteroid or comet will be to
D. astronomers have developed a scale for rating the
likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will
E. astronomers have developed a scale that rates the
likelihood of a particular asteroid or comet that may.

OA is C

A,B -> out incorrect modifiers

What is the purpose of the scale?
- to report the probability of comet colliding with th earth
so "may " is incorrect usag here.

E -> out

" for rating " is undiomatic .
-> D is out

C wins

Kudos [?]: 798 [4], given: 10

Intern
Joined: 16 Jul 2007
Posts: 10

Kudos [?]: 13 [4], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jan 2009, 17:47
4
KUDOS
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
IMO D

A and B are out. Who is responding to the public's fascination? The astronomers can, but a scale cannot respond to the public's fascination.
Responding to the public's fascination, astronomers ....
C) ... how likely will be to collide (incorrrect)
D) ..the likelihood that something will collide (correct)
E) ....the likelihood of something that may collide (awkward)

Kudos [?]: 13 [4], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 23 Apr 2008
Posts: 86

Kudos [?]: 8 [1], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jun 2008, 01:36
1
KUDOS
MY PICK WUD BE D

" MAY" IN E IS WRONG AND "WILL BE TO" DOESNT SEEM CORRECT

Kudos [?]: 8 [1], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 07 Jan 2008
Posts: 398

Kudos [?]: 281 [1], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jun 2008, 01:54
1
KUDOS
I choose C.
May in E seems to be redundant.
D: For rating: usually wrong in GMAT.

Kudos [?]: 281 [1], given: 0

Director
Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 730

Kudos [?]: 818 [1], given: 99

### Show Tags

12 Jan 2009, 10:27
1
KUDOS
IMO B. likelyhood and may together are redundant.

Kudos [?]: 818 [1], given: 99

Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2012
Posts: 107

Kudos [?]: 16 [1], given: 66

Schools: IIMA
Re: Responding to the publics fascination with-and sometimes [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Jul 2014, 04:10
1
KUDOS
Responding to the public’s fascination with - and sometimes undue alarm over-possible threats from asteroids, a scale
developed by astronomers rates the likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet may collide with Earth.

it will modify a noun-scientist ; further 'likelihood that' -idiom , took 30 second to answer it

Hope that helps:)
_________________

If you are not over prepared then you are under prepared !!!

Kudos [?]: 16 [1], given: 66

Current Student
Joined: 02 Aug 2007
Posts: 186

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Schools: Wharton

### Show Tags

21 Jun 2008, 08:36
Between C and E, I choose C.

The "may" in E is redundant as we are using "likelihood". OA?

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 73

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jun 2008, 03:38
goalsnr wrote:
Responding to the public’s fascination with-and sometimes
undue alarm over-possible threats from asteroids, a scale
developed by astronomers rates the likelihood that a particular
asteroid or comet may
collide with Earth.
A. a scale developed by astronomers rates the likelihood
that a particular asteroid or comet may
B. a scale that astronomers have developed rates how
likely it is for a particular asteroid or comet to
C. astronomers have developed a scale to rate how likely
a particular asteroid or comet will be to
D. astronomers have developed a scale for rating the
likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will
E. astronomers have developed a scale that rates the
likelihood of a particular asteroid or comet that may.

Will go for Option E.
This a case of dangling modifier and hence A, B are incorrect.
Out of C,D and E is more concise.

Kudos [?]: 25 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 505

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Jun 2008, 04:08
Will go for E.. "likelihood of" is idiomatic not "likelihood that" . Hence D is not correct.

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Jun 2008
Posts: 304

Kudos [?]: 169 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jan 2009, 20:54
Responding to the public’s fascination with-and sometimes
undue alarm over-possible threats from asteroids, a scale
developed by astronomers rates the likelihood that a particular
asteroid or comet may
collide with Earth.
A. a scale developed by astronomers rates the likelihood
that a particular asteroid or comet may
B. a scale that astronomers have developed rates how
likely it is for a particular asteroid or comet to
C. astronomers have developed a scale to rate how likely
a particular asteroid or comet will be to
D. astronomers have developed a scale for rating the
likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will
E. astronomers have developed a scale that rates the
likelihood of a particular asteroid or comet that may.

Kudos [?]: 169 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 02 Nov 2008
Posts: 276

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

11 Jan 2009, 23:19
vivektripathi wrote:
Responding to the public’s fascination with-and sometimes
undue alarm over-possible threats from asteroids, a scale
developed by astronomers rates the likelihood that a particular
asteroid or comet may
collide with Earth.
A. a scale developed by astronomers rates the likelihood
that a particular asteroid or comet may
B. a scale that astronomers have developed rates how
likely it is for a particular asteroid or comet to
C. astronomers have developed a scale to rate how likely
a particular asteroid or comet will be to
D. astronomers have developed a scale for rating the
likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will
E. astronomers have developed a scale that rates the
likelihood of a particular asteroid or comet that may.

A & B- in passive voice
C & D - change meaning from "may" to "will"

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 2

Director
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 855

Kudos [?]: 472 [0], given: 7

### Show Tags

12 Jan 2009, 02:07
I go for C. Another possible answer would be D, but "for rating" is introducing an awkward "likelihood that"
vivektripathi wrote:
Responding to the public’s fascination with-and sometimes
undue alarm over-possible threats from asteroids, a scale
developed by astronomers rates the likelihood that a particular
asteroid or comet may
collide with Earth.
A. a scale developed by astronomers rates the likelihood
that a particular asteroid or comet may
B. a scale that astronomers have developed rates how
likely it is for a particular asteroid or comet to
C. astronomers have developed a scale to rate how likely
a particular asteroid or comet will be to
D. astronomers have developed a scale for rating the
likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will
E. astronomers have developed a scale that rates the
likelihood of a particular asteroid or comet that may.

Kudos [?]: 472 [0], given: 7

Intern
Joined: 14 Oct 2008
Posts: 33

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Jan 2009, 03:05
IMO D

likelihood......may wouldn't be redundant?

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 16 Dec 2008
Posts: 174

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 1

Schools: HBS (R2), Stanford (R2), Columbia (RD-ding), Booth (R2)

### Show Tags

12 Jan 2009, 08:36
The answer is E. (What is the OA?)

My explanation:
Using the 3/2 breakdown, we must first begin by determining who is "responding to the public", the astronomers or the scale. Clearly, it must be the astronomers. Eliminate A and B.

In C, "to rate how" is unidiomatic.

We are left with D and E. In D, "a scale for rating" is unidiomatic.

Therefore, IMO, the answer is E.

Kudos [?]: 48 [0], given: 1

Intern
Joined: 16 Mar 2008
Posts: 20

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

13 Jan 2009, 20:37
4
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Responding to the public’s fascination with-and sometimes
undue alarm over-possible threats from asteroids, a scale
developed by astronomers rates the likelihood that a particular
asteroid or comet may collide with Earth.
A. a scale developed by astronomers rates the likelihood
that a particular asteroid or comet may
>>>> 'a scale' does not 'Responding to the public's...', only astronomers will.
B. a scale that astronomers have developed rates how
likely it is for a particular asteroid or comet to
>>> Same error as A
C. astronomers have developed a scale to rate how likely
a particular asteroid or comet will be to
>>>>' to rate how likely' seems akward.
D. astronomers have developed a scale for rating the
likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will
>>>>> Correct. the likelihood that something will happen.
E. astronomers have developed a scale that rates the
likelihood of a particular asteroid or comet that may.
>>>> likelihood 'of' a particular asteroid or comet that may is not correct since it means that 'scale rates the likelihood of a asteriod or comet' and not the likelihood that asteroid or comet may collide.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 12 Oct 2008
Posts: 543

Kudos [?]: 565 [0], given: 2

### Show Tags

13 Jan 2009, 20:45
Vivek...we would really appreciate if you post OA for the question.....please do not just post the question.
vivektripathi wrote:
Responding to the public’s fascination with-and sometimes
undue alarm over-possible threats from asteroids, a scale
developed by astronomers rates the likelihood that a particular
asteroid or comet may
collide with Earth.
A. a scale developed by astronomers rates the likelihood
that a particular asteroid or comet may
B. a scale that astronomers have developed rates how
likely it is for a particular asteroid or comet to
C. astronomers have developed a scale to rate how likely
a particular asteroid or comet will be to
D. astronomers have developed a scale for rating the
likelihood that a particular asteroid or comet will
E. astronomers have developed a scale that rates the
likelihood of a particular asteroid or comet that may.

Kudos [?]: 565 [0], given: 2

Re: SC-asteroid   [#permalink] 13 Jan 2009, 20:45

Go to page    1   2   3   4   5    Next  [ 81 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
13 Responding to negative reactions to an internal memorandum 5 08 May 2017, 14:12
16 In October 2001, responding to the devastating attack 16 07 May 2017, 07:14
3 Finding the view from the mountains fascinating, all that 9 03 Mar 2017, 11:00
46 Out of America's fascination with all things antique have 67 29 Jun 2017, 06:57
1 Responding to the publics fascination with-and sometimes 16 29 Sep 2014, 03:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by