It is currently 28 Jun 2017, 19:47

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# restrictive clause og 107 ...

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 131
restrictive clause og 107 ... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 May 2008, 04:28
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The physical structure of the human eye enables it to sense light of wavelengths up to 0.0005 mm; infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelength-0.1 mm- is too long to be registered by the eye.
a)infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelength-0.1 mm- is too long to be registered by the eye.

e) however, infrared radiation has a wavelength of 0.1 mm that is too long for the eye to be registered, thus making it invisible.

For option (e) OG says.. using a restrictive clause introduced by "that" suggests not all wavelengths of 0.1 mm are too long for eye to register.

Please someone can help me to understand this explaination.

thanks,
Manager
Joined: 27 Jul 2007
Posts: 112
Re: restrictive clause og 107 ... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 May 2008, 05:15
abhaypratapsingh wrote:
The physical structure of the human eye enables it to sense light of wavelengths up to 0.0005 mm; infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelength-0.1 mm- is too long to be registered by the eye.
a)infrared radiation, however, is invisible because its wavelength-0.1 mm- is too long to be registered by the eye.

e) however, infrared radiation has a wavelength of 0.1 mm that is too long for the eye to be registered, thus making it invisible.

For option (e) OG says.. using a restrictive clause introduced by "that" suggests not all wavelengths of 0.1 mm are too long for eye to register.

Please someone can help me to understand this explaination.

thanks,

Here "that" narrows down the identity of the modified noun "wavelength of 0.1 mm" to correctly identify it. So, "that is too long for the eye to be registered" may not be true for all 0.1mm wavelengths.
e,g;
Pick up the book that is written by Gabriel. ==> not all books are written by Gabriel.
Manager
Joined: 21 Mar 2006
Posts: 131
Re: restrictive clause og 107 ... [#permalink]

### Show Tags

13 May 2008, 16:54

meaning is clear when "that " is placed between two nouns such as between "book" and "gabriel" , but how does the restrictive meaning comes out when "that" is present after the two nouns example:
Gabriels has books on latin literature that makes me uninterested in reading.

how does here "that" restricts the books.

thanks,
Re: restrictive clause og 107 ...   [#permalink] 13 May 2008, 16:54
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Doubt in restrictive and non-restrictive clauses 0 21 May 2017, 06:17
1 Parallel clauses 2 08 Jan 2011, 09:04
2 Parallel that clauses 3 19 Oct 2010, 20:32
5 Participle Clause vs Relative Clause 12 19 Sep 2009, 08:44
That is a restrictive clause.. And it is not required when 0 05 Jun 2009, 08:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by