It is currently 13 Dec 2017, 22:33

# Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Ross R1 | Kellogg R1 | Darden R1 | Tepper R1

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Rhyme's Indecision - Help me choose!!

 new topic post reply Update application status

• 50% [8]
• 50% [8]
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

GMAT Club Legend
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 5926

Kudos [?]: 2216 [0], given: 7

Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45
Rhyme's Indecision - Help me choose!! [#permalink]

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2007, 12:20

After days of non stop fretting, I've come to a point where I have to decide on my classes. My hope is that the results make things clearer for me (they wont, but we can pretend). I have about 13 hours to finalize my decision.

First, lets talk about the static element: I'll be taking economics in a case based format and either operations management or competitive strategy, both case courses. I say either because it will depend on which course has availability - but odds are, I'll be able to get one or the other. One important caveat - taking the econ case course is a risk - its a new professor, so no one knows how many hours a week outside of class to expect or how hard he will be. It could be easy, or it could be tough.

Now, lets talk about the dynamic element: Regressions OR Statistics.

Stats: On the one hand, stats is going to be boring, often computational in nature (lots of manual calculations), and not especially fun. I'd probably be in the top 30% of students in this class on day 1 (in terms of knowledge coming in), meaning I'd have comparatively more time for my other courses - a good thing. This is the "safer" choice, albeit the less interesting course.

Regressions is likely to be substantially more 'real world' interesting, and could provide some minimal value in future courses (though I dont intend to focus in analytical finance, so the value add is trivial at best)... but its also going to be a lot harder. (I'd probably be in the bottom 20% of students on day 1). Scary part ? I heard from someone who minored in econometrics that this course was 'very tough'. Plus, its the GSB too, so double the quantitative difficulty.

So here it is:

Do you risk regressions, maybe learn something interesting even though it isnt at all relevant to your career goals or future course loads? Or do you "play it safe", pay \$5,000 for a course that you will learn very little in, and take stats, knowing itll be more boring and no more (or less) valuable than regressions?

Kudos [?]: 2216 [0], given: 7

Manager
Joined: 04 Aug 2005
Posts: 202

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2007, 12:30
First of all, is the stats course required? Will you have to take it at some point anyways? And second of all, will you have another opportunity to take the regressions class?

If the stats course is required, I would go ahead and take it as it would allow you to ease into b-school mode. However, if it is not, I would probably take the regressions course since you seem pretty excited about it.

That's just my \$.02. Your mileage may vary, of course.

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 5926

Kudos [?]: 2216 [0], given: 7

Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2007, 12:31
*A* stats course is required. Either Regressions or Stats. It doesnt matter which. Although you can do both, most people just take one or the other.

Kudos [?]: 2216 [0], given: 7

Manager
Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 208

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2007, 12:38
rhyme,

I didn't vote but I'll add my 2 cents. If you got other courses this term that will push you past your limits then go with stats but if your other courses are going to leave you in a position where you can with a little effort find room for extra study then go for Regression. It has been my experience that knowledge never goes waste. What might seem vaguely relevant today could be vital a few years later.

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 915

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2007, 12:52
Regression is actually more interesting. I had to take a class for my Masters, and while I did not make an A, I would still take it given a choice I voted regression.

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Affiliations: HHonors Diamond, BGS Honor Society
Joined: 05 Apr 2006
Posts: 5926

Kudos [?]: 2216 [0], given: 7

Schools: Chicago (Booth) - Class of 2009
GMAT 1: 730 Q45 V45

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2007, 13:24
I found out my competitive strategy course could be very demanding, so im going stats... and i found out half of stats is introductions to regressions.... so really i'll only be bored for the first few weeks.

Kudos [?]: 2216 [0], given: 7

Director
Joined: 03 Mar 2007
Posts: 985

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 8

Location: Hong Kong
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: HKUST MBA - Class of 2014
GMAT 1: 740 Q48 V44
GPA: 3.2
WE: Consulting (Consulting)

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2007, 14:47
Is it linear regression or non-linear regression? or both?

The s*** hits the fan when its non-linear regression. Personally I found regression to be more useful than general statistics, but with your time demands, I would settle for stats.

And breezing through one class is better than coping with another. (More time to spend with your wife and your pets and eat some Thai food!!)

Kudos [?]: 47 [0], given: 8

SVP
Joined: 01 Nov 2006
Posts: 1855

Kudos [?]: 210 [0], given: 2

Schools: The Duke MBA, Class of 2009

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2007, 16:03
Computational? Really? We don't compute jack in stats. It's much more about getting how it works than doing a whole lot of calculating. As my prof says, that's what excel is for.

Kudos [?]: 210 [0], given: 2

SVP
Joined: 31 Jul 2006
Posts: 2302

Kudos [?]: 483 [0], given: 0

Schools: Darden

### Show Tags

12 Sep 2007, 17:36
don't make things any harder on yourself. Spend you extra time doing other stuff.

Kudos [?]: 483 [0], given: 0

12 Sep 2007, 17:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Rhyme's Indecision - Help me choose!!

 new topic post reply Update application status

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.