It is currently 18 Nov 2017, 18:34

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Rising inventories, when unaccompanied correspondingly by

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 257

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Location: Las Vegas, NV
Rising inventories, when unaccompanied correspondingly by [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2005, 21:16
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

14% (00:00) correct 86% (00:53) wrong based on 9 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Rising inventories, when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead to production cutbacks that would hamper economic growth.

(A) when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead
(B) when not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, possibly leads
(C) when they were unaccompanied by corresponding sales increases, can lead
(D) if not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales, possibly leads
(E) if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 22 Aug 2005
Posts: 1111

Kudos [?]: 124 [0], given: 0

Location: CA

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2005, 21:26
I will go with E. Do not have sensible explanation though.

Kudos [?]: 124 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 716

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Sep 2005, 22:18
Yes, E looks fine

(A) when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead
- no need of adverb usage --LY...
(B) when not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, possibly leads
- WOULD in non-underlined portion has a sense of probablility, so B changes the meaning of the sentence.
(C) when they were unaccompanied by corresponding sales increases, can lead
- tense problem...
(D) if not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales, possibly leads
- same as a, no need of adverb...
(E) if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead
- this one looks ok.

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 28 Jan 2004
Posts: 197

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Location: Ghana

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2005, 00:09
riteshgupta1 wrote:
Yes, E looks fine

(A) when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead
- no need of adverb usage --LY...
(B) when not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, possibly leads
- WOULD in non-underlined portion has a sense of probablility, so B changes the meaning of the sentence.
(C) when they were unaccompanied by corresponding sales increases, can lead
- tense problem...
(D) if not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales, possibly leads
- same as a, no need of adverb...
(E) if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead
- this one looks ok.

Yes. i agree E looks fine. But ritesh can you please explain what the tense problem is in C? Is it the "if not" part or the "increased sales" part?
_________________

It's not over until it's OVER!

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 07 Jun 2005
Posts: 90

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2005, 05:03
Had picked A initially but realised unaccompanied correspondingly sounds wrong so go with E.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Posts: 5032

Kudos [?]: 452 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2005, 05:05
(A) when unaccompanied correspondingly by increases in sales, can lead
- unaccompanied correspondingly is unidiomatic

(B) when not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, possibly leads
- awkward sentence
(C) when they were unaccompanied by corresponding sales increases, can lead
- were is the wrong tense

(D) if not accompanied by correspondingly increased sales, possibly leads
- correspondingly is unidiomatic

(E) if not accompanied by corresponding increases in sales, can lead
- E is the best choice

Kudos [?]: 452 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 257

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Location: Las Vegas, NV

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2005, 13:36
OA is E.

Kudos [?]: 5 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 15 Aug 2005
Posts: 793

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

Location: Singapore

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2005, 21:08
A simply rephrasing will make it easy..

If the rising inventories is not accompanied.....it (will is ideal)can lead to cutbacks!

E it is!
_________________

Cheers, Rahul.

Kudos [?]: 75 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 11 Mar 2005
Posts: 716

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

04 Sep 2005, 08:24
No Rahul, 'will' will change the meaning of the sentence. Only can or may will work here.

We need to be very careful when we use WILL. It says that the outcome is definte. Unless the outcome is definite, can or may should be substituted for will.

Same is the case with WOULD.

Hope it helps.

Kudos [?]: 79 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2734

Kudos [?]: 1076 [0], given: 4

Location: New York City

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2007, 14:20
riteshgupta1 wrote:
No Rahul, 'will' will change the meaning of the sentence. Only can or may will work here.

We need to be very careful when we use WILL. It says that the outcome is definte. Unless the outcome is definite, can or may should be substituted for will.

Same is the case with WOULD.

Hope it helps.

Yes. this is a very important point.

If i were rich, i will buy several BMWs.
If i were rich, i would buy several BMWs.

Kudos [?]: 1076 [0], given: 4

CEO
Joined: 21 Jan 2007
Posts: 2734

Kudos [?]: 1076 [0], given: 4

Location: New York City

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2007, 14:26
is there a quick way to determine whether we should use if or when?

Kudos [?]: 1076 [0], given: 4

Manager
Status: Preparing for GMAT - March 2011
Joined: 21 May 2010
Posts: 144

Kudos [?]: 21 [1], given: 0

Location: London
Schools: INSEAD, RSM, HEC, St. Gallen, IF, IESE
WE 1: Finance 6 years

### Show Tags

16 Feb 2011, 09:26
1
KUDOS
bmwhype2 wrote:
is there a quick way to determine whether we should use if or when?

We use When for Time whereas we use use If for conditional statement or hypothetical statements. There choice A,B,C are out.

D is unidiomatic.
_________________

In The World Full Of Duplicates,, I Am The Only Masterpiece..
Girl Power
http://gmatclub.com/forum/beat-the-beast-with-non-native-speaker-108349.html

Kudos [?]: 21 [1], given: 0

Re:   [#permalink] 16 Feb 2011, 09:26
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Rising inventories, when unaccompanied correspondingly by

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.