It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 17:04

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Robots X, Y, and Z each assemble components at their

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 30 Nov 2008
Posts: 485

Kudos [?]: 361 [2], given: 15

Schools: Fuqua
Robots X, Y, and Z each assemble components at their [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2009, 17:00
2
KUDOS
6
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

72% (01:18) correct 28% (01:07) wrong based on 409 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

Robots X, Y, and Z each assemble components at their respective constant rates. If $$r_x$$ is the ratio of Robot X's constant rate to Robot Z's constant rate and $$r_y$$ is the ratio of Robot Y's constant rate to Robot Z's constant rate, is Robot Z's constant rate the greatest of the three?

(1) $$r_x < r_y$$
(2) $$r_y < 1$$

OPEN DISCUSSION OF THIS QUESTION IS HERE: robots-x-y-and-z-each-assemble-components-at-their-respect-139477.html
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 361 [2], given: 15

Manager
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 239

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Re: Robots X, Y, and Z each assemble components at their [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2009, 19:03
stmnt 1 - not suffic.
a<b => x/z < y/z => x< y

stmnt 2 - b<1 - not suffic.

let's combine - b<1 => a<b and a<1
still not sufficient, z could be >,= or < than a and/or b, and it would still satisfy stmnt 1 and 2.

I think it's E.

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 30 Oct 2008
Posts: 30

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Re: Robots X, Y, and Z each assemble components at their [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2009, 01:18
for 1 and 2
a < b < 1
x/z < y/z < 1
denominator z is greater than numerator. Hence C is answer.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 04 Jan 2008
Posts: 893

Kudos [?]: 747 [0], given: 17

Re: Robots X, Y, and Z each assemble components at their [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2009, 02:27
I think E
Lets take V as Robot Z's constant rate

is Robot Z's constant rate the greatest of the three?

X:Y:Z=Va:Vb:V
now to have V highest we need to know whether V is <0 or >0
V could be 2 or say, 1/2
it changes the whole picture

Robots X, Y, and Z each assemble components in their respective constant rates. If a is the ration of Robot X's constant rate to Robot Z's constant rate and b is the ratio of Robot Y's constant rate to Robot Z's constant rate, is Robot Z's constant rate the greatest of the three.
1) a < b
2) b < 1
_________________

http://gmatclub.com/forum/math-polygons-87336.html
http://gmatclub.com/forum/competition-for-the-best-gmat-error-log-template-86232.html

Kudos [?]: 747 [0], given: 17

Current Student
Joined: 13 Jan 2009
Posts: 364

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 1

Location: India
Re: Robots X, Y, and Z each assemble components at their [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2009, 16:39
My take is C

X:Z=a; Y:Z=b
that means Z is bigger than Y.

1 says a<b so again Z is bigger than X.

Lets solve it by statements

Y= bZ Y is b times faster than Z if b is less than 1 then Z is faster on the similar note A can deduced.

@A Nitya .... Picture will not change as long as V is greater zero and V can not be negative as rate will always be positive.

Kudos [?]: 144 [0], given: 1

Manager
Joined: 19 Aug 2006
Posts: 239

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Re: Robots X, Y, and Z each assemble components at their [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2009, 18:03
hemantsood wrote:
My take is C

X:Z=a; Y:Z=b
that means Z is bigger than Y.

1 says a<b so again Z is bigger than X.

Lets solve it by statements

Y= bZ Y is b times faster than Z if b is less than 1 then Z is faster on the similar note A can deduced.

@A Nitya .... Picture will not change as long as V is greater zero and V can not be negative as rate will always be positive.

I think you reasoning is correct, the answer should be C, not E.

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2010
Posts: 281

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 1

Re: Robots X, Y, and Z each assemble components at their [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Jan 2011, 21:26
We need both the information if the constant rate for Z is greater or not.
1. says that constant rate of Y is greater than X. x/z < x/y
2. says that constant rate of Y is smaller than Z. y/z <1

so we need both the information.

Kudos [?]: 35 [0], given: 1

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 41892

Kudos [?]: 129035 [3], given: 12187

Re: Robots X, Y, and Z each assemble components at their [#permalink]

### Show Tags

04 Jan 2011, 03:33
3
KUDOS
Expert's post
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
ajit257 wrote:
see attachment

Can some explain the reasoning behind this ques.

Robots X, Y, and Z each assemble components at their respective constant rates. If rx is the ratio of robot X's constant rate to robot Z's constant rate and ry is the ratio of robot Y's constant rate to robot Z's constant rate, is robot Z's constant rate the greatest of the three?

Let the rates of robots X, Y, and Z be x, y, and z respectively. Given: $$r_x=\frac{x}{z}$$ and $$r_y=\frac{y}{z}$$. Question is $$z>x$$ and $$z>y$$?

(1) $$r_x<r_y$$ --> $$\frac{x}{z}<\frac{y}{z}$$ --> $$x<y$$. Not sufficient.

(2) $$r_y<1$$ --> $$\frac{y}{z}<1$$ --> $$y<z$$. Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) As $$x<y$$ and $$y<z$$ then $$x<y<z$$. Sufficient.

_________________

Kudos [?]: 129035 [3], given: 12187

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 16636

Kudos [?]: 273 [0], given: 0

Re: Robots X, Y, and Z each assemble components at their [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2015, 07:43
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 273 [0], given: 0

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 41892

Kudos [?]: 129035 [0], given: 12187

Re: Robots X, Y, and Z each assemble components at their [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Aug 2015, 07:47
mrsmarthi wrote:
This topic is locked. If you want to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum.

Robots X, Y, and Z each assemble components at their respective constant rates. If $$r_x$$ is the ratio of Robot X's constant rate to Robot Z's constant rate and $$r_y$$ is the ratio of Robot Y's constant rate to Robot Z's constant rate, is Robot Z's constant rate the greatest of the three?

(1) $$r_x < r_y$$
(2) $$r_y < 1$$

OPEN DISCUSSION OF THIS QUESTION IS HERE: robots-x-y-and-z-each-assemble-components-at-their-respect-139477.html
_________________

Kudos [?]: 129035 [0], given: 12187

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 16636

Kudos [?]: 273 [0], given: 0

Re: Robots X, Y, and Z each assemble components at their [#permalink]

### Show Tags

25 Feb 2017, 16:16
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

Kudos [?]: 273 [0], given: 0

Re: Robots X, Y, and Z each assemble components at their   [#permalink] 25 Feb 2017, 16:16
Display posts from previous: Sort by