It is currently 22 Nov 2017, 17:35

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Rock samples taken from the remains of an asteroid about

Author Message
VP
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 1481

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2006, 20:18
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:53) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 1 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Rock samples taken from the remains of an asteroid about twice the size of the 6-nuke-wide asteroid that eradicated the dinosaurs has been dated to be 3.47 billion years old and thus is evidence of the earliest known asteroid impact on Earth.

A. has been dated to be 3.47 billion years old and thus is
B. has been dated at 3.47 billion years old and thus
C. have been dated to be 3.47billion years old and thus are
D. have been dated as being 3.47 billion years old and thus
E. have been dated at 3.47billion years old and thus are

no OA.

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 11 Jul 2006
Posts: 37

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Location: Boston

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2006, 20:28
A and B can be ruled out becaue of 'has been', does not go wth samples.
C loses out because of 'dated to be'. Of the rest D looks like the more likely one to me.
I will go with D.

MA wrote:
Rock samples taken from the remains of an asteroid about twice the size of the 6-nuke-wide asteroid that eradicated the dinosaurs has been dated to be 3.47 billion years old and thus is evidence of the earliest known asteroid impact on Earth.

A. has been dated to be 3.47 billion years old and thus is
B. has been dated at 3.47 billion years old and thus
C. have been dated to be 3.47billion years old and thus are
D. have been dated as being 3.47 billion years old and thus
E. have been dated at 3.47billion years old and thus are

no OA.

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1115

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Location: India

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2006, 21:05
Picking C.
'rock samples' .................'have been'.
'thus are'...........'evidence of'
Also in D, 'thus' should be followed by 'are' to make sense.

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2892

Kudos [?]: 336 [1], given: 0

Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2006, 21:09
1
KUDOS
I go with E.

A and B are out because of "has" ("Rock samples" is plural).

IMO, "dated at" is the correct idiom.
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Kudos [?]: 336 [1], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2004
Posts: 467

Kudos [?]: 140 [0], given: 0

Location: united states

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2006, 21:11
Either C or E. Could someone explain the difference between "dated to be" and "dated at"?
_________________

for every person who doesn't try because he is
afraid of loosing , there is another person who
keeps making mistakes and succeeds..

Kudos [?]: 140 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1399

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2006, 22:09
I am going for E here

C says "samples dated to be..." you can't be dated TO BE x years old... IMO it is redundant, because DATED already implicates that you ARE x years old

D uses "being"... and misses "are" in the end

E

Last edited by u2lover on 18 Jul 2006, 22:20, edited 1 time in total.

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1728

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2006, 22:11
Will go with E.

Only C and E are the valid choices. But IMO dated at is idiomatic.

Kudos [?]: 102 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1115

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Location: India

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2006, 22:17
ps_dahiya wrote:
I go with E.

A and B are out because of "has" ("Rock samples" is plural).

IMO, "dated at" is the correct idiom.

I was not sure of idiom 'dated at' and went for C over E. .

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

VP
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1399

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2006, 22:20
there is no idiom "dated at", but "dated to be" is redundant... see my expln earlier

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 07 Nov 2005
Posts: 1115

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Location: India

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2006, 22:28
u2lover wrote:
I am going for E here

C says "samples dated to be..." you can't be dated TO BE x years old... IMO it is redundant, because DATED already implicates that you ARE x years old

D uses "being"... and misses "are" in the end

E

That does make sense. Thanks u2Lover.
So ,is it ok to say......fossils are dated to 4 millions years ago.
I foung this usage very common on googling.
I will try and find more about it if possible .

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Joined: 22 May 2006
Posts: 369

Kudos [?]: 154 [0], given: 0

Location: Rancho Palos Verdes

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2006, 22:29
IMO C.

correct idiom : dated to be + certain period of time, dated at + specific time.??
_________________

The only thing that matters is what you believe.

Kudos [?]: 154 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2892

Kudos [?]: 336 [0], given: 0

Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008

### Show Tags

18 Jul 2006, 22:33
buzzgaurav wrote:
u2lover wrote:
I am going for E here

C says "samples dated to be..." you can't be dated TO BE x years old... IMO it is redundant, because DATED already implicates that you ARE x years old

D uses "being"... and misses "are" in the end

E

That does make sense. Thanks u2Lover.
So ,is it ok to say......fossils are dated to 4 millions years ago.
I foung this usage very common on googling.
I will try and find more about it if possible .

As per my understanding both are correct:
dated to 4 millions years ago
dated at 4 millions years old
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Kudos [?]: 336 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 15 Nov 2005
Posts: 241

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

Location: Italy

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2006, 02:18
MA wrote:
Rock samples taken from the remains of an asteroid about twice the size of the 6-nuke-wide asteroid that eradicated the dinosaurs has been dated to be 3.47 billion years old and thus is evidence of the earliest known asteroid impact on Earth.

A. has been dated to be 3.47 billion years old and thus is
B. has been dated at 3.47 billion years old and thus
C. have been dated to be 3.47billion years old and thus are
D. have been dated as being 3.47 billion years old and thus
E. have been dated at 3.47billion years old and thus are

no OA.

plural subject then we need have at the beginning (samples plural) in C and D to be and as being seems awkward I will pick then E
_________________

â€œIf money is your hope for independence you will never have it. The only real security that a man will have in this world is a reserve of knowledge, experience, and ability.â€

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 25 Nov 2004
Posts: 1481

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2006, 12:17

Kudos [?]: 131 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1399

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2006, 13:02
the other discussion is no help I am still sticking to E as C seems redundant...

MA, no OA for this? that sucks

Kudos [?]: 227 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 748

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

19 Jul 2006, 13:14
MA wrote:
Rock samples taken from the remains of an asteroid about twice the size of the 6-nuke-wide asteroid that eradicated the dinosaurs has been dated to be 3.47 billion years old and thus is evidence of the earliest known asteroid impact on Earth.

A. has been dated to be 3.47 billion years old and thus is
B. has been dated at 3.47 billion years old and thus
C. have been dated to be 3.47billion years old and thus are
D. have been dated as being 3.47 billion years old and thus
E. have been dated at 3.47billion years old and thus are

no OA.

C.

"dated to be" is idiomatically correct, IMO. Its usage is similar to "estimated to be".

Anyway, lets get to the idiom last.
A, B out due to SVA
D....thus does not connect well without "are"
Betwen C and E, I think C is idiomatically correct. Consider the difference between 'estimated to be' and 'estimated at'. The former is correct. I believe that similarly 'dated to be' is more correct than 'dated at'.

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Re: SC: Rock   [#permalink] 19 Jul 2006, 13:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Rock samples taken from the remains of an asteroid about

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.