Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

It appears that you are browsing the GMAT Club forum unregistered!

Signing up is free, quick, and confidential.
Join other 500,000 members and get the full benefits of GMAT Club

Registration gives you:

Tests

Take 11 tests and quizzes from GMAT Club and leading GMAT prep companies such as Manhattan GMAT,
Knewton, and others. All are free for GMAT Club members.

Applicant Stats

View detailed applicant stats such as GPA, GMAT score, work experience, location, application
status, and more

Books/Downloads

Download thousands of study notes,
question collections, GMAT Club’s
Grammar and Math books.
All are free!

Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:

Sam and Jessica are invited to a dance. If there are 7 men and 7 women [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Mar 2010, 23:56

1

This post received KUDOS

1

This post was BOOKMARKED

00:00

A

B

C

D

E

Difficulty:

35% (medium)

Question Stats:

63% (01:39) correct
37% (01:21) wrong based on 25 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Sam and Jessica are invited to a dance. If there are 7 men and 7 women in total at the dance, and one woman and one man are chosen to lead the dance, what is the probability that Sam and Jessica will NOT be the pair chosen to lead the dance?

I came up with the answer but I tried to solve it in a different way originally and failed miserably.

Why can't i come up with the right fraction if I say, there are 6/7 chance that Sam will NOT be picked and 6/7 chance that Jessican will NOT be picked. So the probably is 36/49 that Sam and Jessica will NOT be the pair choosen. Why wouldn't this method work?

Sam and Jessica are invited to a dance. If there are 7 men and 7 women in total at the dance, and one woman and one man are chosen to lead the dance, what is the probability that Sam and Jessica will NOT be the pair chosen to lead the dance?

A) 1/49 B) 1/7 C) 6/7 D) 47/49 E) 48/49

I came up with the answer but I tried to solve it in a different way originally and failed miserably.

Why can't i come up with the right fraction if I say, there are 6/7 chance that Sam will NOT be picked and 6/7 chance that Jessican will NOT be picked. So the probably is 36/49 that Sam and Jessica will NOT be the pair choosen. Why wouldn't this method work?

Welcome to the Gmat Club.

The easiest way to solve this problem is to calculate opposite probability and subtract this value from 1: The opposite probability is that Sam and Jessica WILL be chosen to lead \(=\frac{1}{7}*\frac{1}{7}=\frac{1}{49}\). So, the probability that they will NOT be chosen to lead \(= 1-\frac{1}{49}=\frac{48}{49}\).

Answer: E.

The way you are doing is wrong because \(\frac{36}{49}\) is the probability that in the leading pair won't be neither Sam nor Jessica. But in the leading pair can be Sam with any woman but Jessica and can be Jessica with any man but Sam.

So, if you are doing this way you should count \(\frac{7}{7}*\frac{6}{7}\) probability of pairing any man (\(\frac{7}{7}\)) with any woman but Jessica (\(\frac{6}{7}\)) PLUS \(\frac{1}{7}*\frac{6}{7}\) probability of pairing Jessica (\(\frac{1}{7}\)) with any man but Sam (\(\frac{6}{7}\)) \(=\frac{7}{7}*\frac{6}{7}+\frac{1}{7}*\frac{6}{7}=\frac{48}{49}\).

OR you can think about it this way: there are total \(7*7=49\) pairs possible, and only one pair is when Jessica and Sam are together, hence probability \(=\frac{49-1}{49}=\frac{48}{49}\)

OR: pairs without Jessica \(6*7=42\) and pairs with Jessica but without Sam \(1*6=6\), hence probability \(=\frac{42+6}{49}=\frac{48}{49}\).

Hi! Could one of the moderators please help me with it? "Sam and Jessica are invited to a dance. If there are 7 men and 7 women in total at the dance, and one woman and one man ar chosen to lead the dance, what is the probability that Sam and Jessica will NOT be chosen to lead the dance?"

I know, the thread was posted a looooooonnnnnnng time ago, but I am so confused with which method I should take and WHY?

My question is: why can't I solve the problem in this way? 1 - C 1 7/C2 14= 12/13 C1 7 : I would choose one group out of 7 (since there are 14 people) C2 14: altogether I would have chosen 2 people out of 14

The "funny" point is, I do also understand, how the original answer has been calculated. Can someone please help me out?

1. You use p = 1 - q formula in which q means "Sam and Jessica"

2. \(C^{14}_2\) as the total number of all possibilities are incorrect as it counts man-man and woman-woman pairs. So, you have to use \(C^7_1 * C^7_1\) = 49 or any man and any woman combinations.

3. \(C^7_1\). I don't get the reasoning behind the formula. There is only one way to choose "Sam and Jessica" and why do you think that there is 7 groups? There is no special assignment for each woman and man.

Let me know if you need further help.
_________________

Re: probabilty problem "Sam & Jessica" [#permalink]

Show Tags

31 Jul 2010, 10:10

walker wrote:

1. You use p = 1 - q formula in which q means "Sam and Jessica"

2. \(C^{14}_2\) as the total number of all possibilities are incorrect as it counts man-man and woman-woman pairs. So, you have to use \(C^7_1 * C^7_1\) = 49 or any man and any woman combinations.

3. \(C^7_1\). I don't get the reasoning behind the formula. There is only one way to choose "Sam and Jessica" and why do you think that there is 7 groups? There is no special assignment for each woman and man.

Let me know if you need further help.

Hi, "walker"!

Thank you for your explanation!

Could you be so kind and explain to me, when to use what kind of formula? My problem is, I often mix combinatorics-probability formula with simple probability formula. Is there a helpful strategy?

I think I understand why GMAC use "counting" rather than "prob/comb" term. It seems you are trying to remember where which formula to use rather than understand how to "count". So, my advice is to read this [http://gmatclub.com/forum/math-probability-87244.html][http://gmatclub.com/forum/math-combinatorics-87345.html] and each time you see prob/comb problem try to get idea how to count and then use an appropriate formula.
_________________

Re: probabilty problem "Sam & Jessica" [#permalink]

Show Tags

02 Aug 2010, 17:44

I personally think this problem is solved so much easier using simple probability rules

The trick here is to estimate the individual probabilities of selecting him and her and multiply them because the events are independent from each other. the probability of selecting 1 individual out of 7 is 1/7 and the probability of selecting him and her is 1/7*1/7=1/49.

P of not selecting them both is what is asked for.

1-1/49 = 48/49.

I hope u find this method much more clear and concise.
_________________

Re: Sam and Jessica are invited to a dance. If there are 7 men and 7 women [#permalink]

Show Tags

26 Nov 2016, 03:07

Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________

There’s something in Pacific North West that you cannot find anywhere else. The atmosphere and scenic nature are next to none, with mountains on one side and ocean on...

Joe Navarro is an ex FBI agent who was a founding member of the FBI’s Behavioural Analysis Program. He was a body language expert who he used his ability to successfully...