It is currently 17 Oct 2017, 19:20

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# SC: Custom inspectors

Author Message
Senior Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2007
Posts: 364

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2007, 11:12
bmwhype2 wrote:
bmwhype2 wrote:
b14kumar wrote:
cindyn wrote:
No matter how patiently they explain their reasons for confiscating certain items, travelers often treat customs inspectors like wanton poachers rather than government employees.

A
B travellers often treat customs inspectors as wanton poachers instead of government employees.
C travellers often treat customs inspectors as if they were not government employees but wanton poachers.
D customs inspectors are often treated by travelers as if they were wanton poachers rather than government employees.
E customs inspectors are often treated not like government employees but wanton poachers by travelers.

It's D.

D customs inspectors are often treated by travelers as if they were wanton poachers rather than government employees

'rather than' is preferred in GMAT.
moreover, 'they' should modify 'customs inspectors'.

Regards,
Brajesh

How can they modify inspectors if travelers is closer to they than inspectors?

This question is a really horrible one.

lol. learned a lot in 2 months.

Both pronouns in the dependent clause refer back to a single noun. it cannot be travelers. That leaves D and E. E is missing LIKE.

completely off topic but your avatar is hilarious! kristin kreuk's expression is ridiculous (in a good way)!

Kudos [?]: 104 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 17 Sep 2005
Posts: 901

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2007, 07:32
bmwhype2 wrote:
b14kumar wrote:
cindyn wrote:
No matter how patiently they explain their reasons for confiscating certain items, travelers often treat customs inspectors like wanton poachers rather than government employees.

A
B travellers often treat customs inspectors as wanton poachers instead of government employees.
C travellers often treat customs inspectors as if they were not government employees but wanton poachers.
D customs inspectors are often treated by travelers as if they were wanton poachers rather than government employees.
E customs inspectors are often treated not like government employees but wanton poachers by travelers.

It's D.

D customs inspectors are often treated by travelers as if they were wanton poachers rather than government employees

'rather than' is preferred in GMAT.
moreover, 'they' should modify 'customs inspectors'.

Regards,
Brajesh

How can they modify inspectors if travelers is closer to they than inspectors?

This question is a really horrible one.

Sorry, I am not very frequent on checking all messages. I missed this one.

Well, we need to think logically also....
If 'they' is used for "travelers" then the essence of sentence is gone.
Logically, "they" can only refer to "custom inspectors".

- Brajesh

Kudos [?]: 112 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 08 Dec 2006
Posts: 89

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2007, 22:55
Its D ...but the real reason why its D is because

A,B,C have incorrect modifiers

E - is tempted but it is not parallel 'not like ...but ..'.. and secondly the phrase 'wanton poachers by travelers' distorts the meaning
E has the bproblem of like; see example below

AS: When comparing use AS with noun verb combination
Example: He did not vote for congress as I did
LIKE: When comparing use LIKE with noun noun combination
Example: His condition is like mine

D. No matter how patiently they explain their reasons for confiscating certain items, customs inspectors are often treated by travelers as if they were wanton poachers rather than government employees.

To make sure they in the non-underlined part in the question refers to the custom officers (logically needed also), we need to make sure that it falls antecedent to custom officers. D introduces the needed subject in the following clause, joined by no matter.

customs inspectors are often treated by travelers as if they were wanton poachers rather than government employees, No matter how patiently they explain their reasons for confiscating certain items.

IMO D is correct.

Kudos [?]: 21 [0], given: 0

11 Aug 2007, 22:55

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 23 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by