It is currently 20 Oct 2017, 16:57

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# SC:ECONOMY

Author Message
SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1603

Kudos [?]: 303 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2003, 02:15
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The expected rise in the price of oil could be a serious impact to industrialized nations and severely diminish the possibility to have an economy free of inflation.

(A) be a serious impact to industrialized nations and severely diminish the possibility to have
(B) seriously impact on industrialized nations and severely impede the possibility to have
(C) seriously impact on industrialized nations and severely impede the possibility of having
(D) have a serious impact on industrialized nations and severely impede the possibility to have
(E) have a serious impact on industrialized nations and severely diminish the possibility of having

Kudos [?]: 303 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 08 Apr 2003
Posts: 150

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2003, 04:46
Ok answer change , is it B?? this is a tricky one .

Kudos [?]: 50 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1603

Kudos [?]: 303 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2003, 06:28
it is E. A correct idiom is "to diminish the possibility of having an economy free of inflation"

Kudos [?]: 303 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 04 Jun 2003
Posts: 61

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2003, 07:14
I'd vote for C.

For the begining of the asked chunk: I think that it should be the active form.
At the end of that chunk: of having is correct.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 22 May 2003
Posts: 328

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

Location: Uruguay

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2003, 21:24
I chose "C" as well..

Thought that there was a parallelism:

C: "could seriously impact...and severly impede..." (seemed ok)

E: "could have a serious impact...and severly diminish..." (seems that the paralllism is not being respected)

Does anybody know why E is correct then? Is there a parallelism at all?

Kudos [?]: 173 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2003
Posts: 141

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Location: Hockeytown

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2003, 23:57
stolyar wrote:
The expected rise in the price of oil could be a serious impact to industrialized nations and severely diminish the possibility to have an economy free of inflation.

(A) be a serious impact to industrialized nations and severely diminish the possibility to have
(B) seriously impact on industrialized nations and severely impede the possibility to have
(C) seriously impact on industrialized nations and severely impede the possibility of having
(D) have a serious impact on industrialized nations and severely impede the possibility to have
(E) have a serious impact on industrialized nations and severely diminish the possibility of having

(A) is wrong because something is an impact on (or upon), not an impact to.
(B) "The possibility to" is wrong - needs to be "the possibility of" + -ing word. Also, "impact on" is not proper grammar.
(C) "Impact on" again.
(D) Same as (B).
(E) is quite beautifully written.

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 18 Jun 2003
Posts: 141

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

Location: Hockeytown

### Show Tags

01 Jul 2003, 23:58
MartinMag wrote:
I chose "C" as well..

Thought that there was a parallelism:

C: "could seriously impact...and severly impede..." (seemed ok)

E: "could have a serious impact...and severly diminish..." (seems that the paralllism is not being respected)

Does anybody know why E is correct then? Is there a parallelism at all?

Could have a serious impact and severely diminish

Parallelism is quite elegant...

Kudos [?]: 38 [0], given: 0

01 Jul 2003, 23:58
Display posts from previous: Sort by