SC - federal law : GMAT Sentence Correction (SC)
Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 28 Feb 2017, 04:37

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

SC - federal law

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 08 Jun 2008
Posts: 50
Followers: 0

Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0

Show Tags

15 Jun 2008, 18:03
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Hey guys

The doctrine applies in Canada, where there is a federal law and a provincial law that are each valid and consistent.

1) is a federal law and a provincial law that are each valid
2) are a federal law and a provincial law that are each valid
3) are a federal law and a provincial law both of which are each valid
4) is a federal law and a provincial law both of which are each valid
5) is a federal and provincial law that is each valid

If you have any questions
New!
Director
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 789
Followers: 5

Kudos [?]: 186 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - federal law [#permalink]

Show Tags

15 Jun 2008, 18:32
between b and c

choose b because shorter, but I have a feeling that it is c

start with "are", because "are" is required for "fed and prov" laws.
Manager
Joined: 16 Mar 2008
Posts: 70
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 7 [0], given: 0

Re: SC - federal law [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Jun 2008, 05:32
b for me...c doesn't looks correct " both of which are each ..." sounds wrong to me...are each ..plural and singular... ?
Manager
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 55
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [1] , given: 1

Re: SC - federal law [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Jun 2008, 10:19
1
KUDOS
A bit tricky but I'll try to break it down.

For starters, the sentence is telling us that there is a federal law and (there is) a provincial law that are each valid and consistent.

There is a federal law AND (There is) a provincial law. The ‘AND’ is combining two clauses and the expletive construction takes on a singular verb as the second expletive construction is implied since it comes after a conjunction. It is NOT of the form ‘There are (a federal law and a provincial law)’ but of the form mentioned at the start.

However, the relative pronoun ‘THAT’ stands for (the federal law and the provincial law). Hence it will be followed by a plural verb.

That's why we can eliminate B, C and E.

The use of 'both of which are each' in Answer choice D is awkward.

SVP
Joined: 30 Apr 2008
Posts: 1887
Location: Oklahoma City
Schools: Hard Knocks
Followers: 40

Kudos [?]: 580 [0], given: 32

Re: SC - federal law [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Jun 2008, 10:37
Great explanation Legend. +1

I came to A as the answer when I tried to think of another sentence using the same concepts that sounded more familiar to me. I came up with this sentence that helped me realize that A is correct. It's a funny sentence, but it helped me.

In New York there is a blue dot and a red dot that are each on a sign. That helped me see the sentence contains 2 items that are each singluar and therefore, the verb should be singular.

The reason "are" is correct in the second part of the sentence is because the sentence is referring to the 2 items collectively. When refer to 2 individual items collectively, it is plural and therefore "are" is correct.

Alternative sentence:

"A tree and a flower are what the teacher instructed us to paint."
_________________

------------------------------------
J Allen Morris
**I'm pretty sure I'm right, but then again, I'm just a guy with his head up his a$$. GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings Manager Joined: 08 Jun 2008 Posts: 50 Followers: 0 Kudos [?]: 9 [0], given: 0 Re: SC - federal law [#permalink] Show Tags 16 Jun 2008, 10:42 OA is B can someone pls throw some more light on the usage of "are" and "is" in the context of this sentence .. it will help .... SVP Joined: 30 Apr 2008 Posts: 1887 Location: Oklahoma City Schools: Hard Knocks Followers: 40 Kudos [?]: 580 [0], given: 32 Re: SC - federal law [#permalink] Show Tags 16 Jun 2008, 11:00 Nope, I can't shed any light on that. I think the answer is A for the reasons I posted above. Where did you get this question? Some sources are better than others due to mistakes in the answers. _________________ ------------------------------------ J Allen Morris **I'm pretty sure I'm right, but then again, I'm just a guy with his head up his a$$.

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Manager
Joined: 03 Apr 2007
Posts: 55
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 12 [0], given: 1

Re: SC - federal law [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Jun 2008, 11:04
I really find it hard to believe that the answer is B. I'm disappointed now .

I guess that's the reason why I normally only do questions from official GMAT questions. ie. OG, GMAT Prep, Sets, 1000 SCs. No other testmaker's questions come close to the quality of those developed by ACT or ETS.
Re: SC - federal law   [#permalink] 16 Jun 2008, 11:04
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
Federal laws promulgated by the FDA banning cancer-causing 2 26 Dec 2010, 07:13
1 The doctrine applies in Canada ,where there is a federal law 8 08 Feb 2009, 09:37
SC_Federal Rules 3 25 Feb 2008, 11:26
sc federal legislation 3 13 Aug 2007, 03:26
SC-Law 9 24 Apr 2007, 11:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by