Check GMAT Club Decision Tracker for the Latest School Decision Releases https://gmatclub.com/AppTrack

 It is currently 25 May 2017, 15:58

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# SC- Parallel construction- Solar Powered

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Posts: 169
Location: MONTREAL
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

SC- Parallel construction- Solar Powered [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2005, 13:53
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

To help preserve ancient Egyptian momuments threatened by high water tables, a Swedish engineering firm has proposed installing pumps, perhaps solar powered, to lower the underground water level and dig trenches around the bases of the stone walls.

(A) to lower the underground water level and dig trenches
(B) to lower the underground water level and to dig trenches
(C) to lower the underground water level and digging trenches
(D) that lower the underground water level and trenches be dug
(E) that lower the underground water level and trench diging

Last edited by mbassmbass04 on 27 Apr 2005, 17:32, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Joined: 25 Aug 2004
Posts: 169
Location: MONTREAL
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2005, 17:33
Please explain why it is not B

(i) to lower

(ii) to dig
Director
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 901
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 45 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2005, 18:46
I think the reason B is out is because the installed pumps will not/cannot dig trenches.
Note that it only makes sense that he proposed 2 things

1. installing pumps
2. Digging trenches

B makes it sound as if the pump installing will " lower the underground water level and dig trenches around the bases of the stone walls.

Now i stand corrected
VP
Joined: 26 Apr 2004
Posts: 1213
Location: Taiwan
Followers: 2

Kudos [?]: 687 [0], given: 0

Re: SC- Parallel construction- Solar Powered [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2005, 19:45
mbassmbass04 wrote:
To help preserve ancient Egyptian momuments threatened by high water tables, a Swedish engineering firm has proposed installing pumps, perhaps solar powered, to lower the underground water level and dig trenches around the bases of the stone walls.

(A) to lower the underground water level and dig trenches
(B) to lower the underground water level and to dig trenches
(C) to lower the underground water level and digging trenches
(D) that lower the underground water level and trenches be dug
(E) that lower the underground water level and trench diging

C it is.

we must discern what kind of parallelism

a Swedish engineering firm has proposed installing pumps .....and digging trenches......

or

a Swedish engineering firm has proposed installing pumps to lower the underground water leve.....and (to) dig trenches......

pumps cannot be renderred to dig trenches.

Hence, C is the OA
Director
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 698
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

Re: SC- Parallel construction- Solar Powered [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2005, 20:27
mbassmbass04 wrote:
To help preserve ancient Egyptian momuments threatened by high water tables, a Swedish engineering firm has proposed installing pumps, perhaps solar powered, to lower the underground water level and dig trenches around the bases of the stone walls.

(A) to lower the underground water level and dig trenches
(B) to lower the underground water level and to dig trenches
(C) to lower the underground water level and digging trenches
(D) that lower the underground water level and trenches be dug
(E) that lower the underground water level and trench diging

IC = A Swedish engineering firm has proposted installing pumps.

Phrase A = to lower the underground water level

Phrase B = digging trenches around the bases of the stone walls.

Correct Syntax: IC, Phrase A and Phrase B. The conjuction and joins equal parts, Phrase A and Phrase B.

B: Introduces false parallelism. If phrase B in AC B [to dig trenches] is a part of the parallelism it means installing pumps to dig trenches.......This is wrong.

D: Relative Clause & DC ---> Final Syntax: IC, RC & DC. This creates a run on sentence.

E: Relative Clause & Phrase ----> Final Syntax: IC, RC & Phrase. "and" should join equal parts. Here it joining RC & Phrase [A No No].

A: IC, Phrase & Clause [????]. Is the latter a Clause. It has a noun and a verb. But doesnt have a subject correct? Yes No?? Anyone care to shed some light on this? Why AC "A" is wrong?

Any of the SC gurus please chime in.
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 15 Dec 2003
Posts: 4289
Followers: 43

Kudos [?]: 469 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

27 Apr 2005, 20:46
Only C is right by having two gerund phrases being compared to each other to maintain parallellism.

A and B are out because they fail to maintain parallellism as folaa and chunjuwu mentioned. I'll dissect C for you:

To help preserve ancient Egyptian momuments threatened by high water tables(infinitive phrase used as an introductory modifier), a Swedish engineering firm has proposed (1)installing pumps, perhaps solar powered, to lower the underground water level and (2)digging trenches around the bases of the stone walls.

In bold is the IC structure. The two gerund phrases (acting as nouns in the same way that gerunds do) "installing pumps" and "digging trenches" are parallel. Note that "to lower the underground water level" is an infinitive phrase of the second order which modifies the gerund phrase (1)
_________________

Best Regards,

Paul

Director
Joined: 14 Jul 2004
Posts: 698
Followers: 1

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

01 May 2005, 14:23
Paul wrote:
Only C is right by having two gerund phrases being compared to each other to maintain parallellism.

A and B are out because they fail to maintain parallellism as folaa and chunjuwu mentioned. I'll dissect C for you:

To help preserve ancient Egyptian momuments threatened by high water tables(infinitive phrase used as an introductory modifier), a Swedish engineering firm has proposed (1)installing pumps, perhaps solar powered, to lower the underground water level and (2)digging trenches around the bases of the stone walls.

In bold is the IC structure. The two gerund phrases (acting as nouns in the same way that gerunds do) "installing pumps" and "digging trenches" are parallel. Note that "to lower the underground water level" is an infinitive phrase of the second order which modifies the gerund phrase (1)

Good explanation. I see why A is wrong. Although i picked "C" [without eliminating A], i wanted to know why A is wrong. It now makes perfect sense.
01 May 2005, 14:23
Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
SC: Parallelism & Idiom 6 15 May 2010, 15:32
SC: Construction 2 25 Dec 2008, 00:18
SC: Parallel comparison 4 19 Jun 2008, 12:28
SC Offical Power Prep 1 23 May 2008, 14:57
SC Parallelism 4 26 Aug 2007, 22:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by